As an emerging health care leader, the senior management has requested that you independently research and explore one of the economic opportunities that may be available in your care setting. This may be offering a new service line, working to improve a service line already offered, retiring an outdated or unprofitable service line, or any other economic initiative that you believe will be of benefit to your care setting in the short and long term. One example of this is a recently launched partnership with a local bicycle sharing company. Your care setting partners with them to host healthy community events that offer free screenings for early detection of various health issues. This helps fulfill some of your care setting’s preventive and healthy lifestyle initiatives, while also potentially driving referrals to other services provided by your care setting. You have been asked to submit your proposal in the form of a 2-4 page executive summary that includes your proposed economic initiative, supporting economic data, and an analysis of the proposal’s benefits for your department and for the care setting overall.
You have been asked to ensure that your report addresses the following. Note: The bullet points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure your work is, at minimum, addressing each of the bullets below. You may also want to read the scoring guide and the Guiding Questions: Executive Brief: Proposal of New Economic Opportunity document to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion:
Propose an economic initiative that presents an opportunity for your care setting at both the micro (departmental, neighborhood) and macro (organizational, community) levels, and that you believe will provide ethical and culturally equitable improvements to the quality of care. Analyze the supply and demand for your proposed economic initiative within contexts relevant to your care setting. Explain relevant economic and environmental data that support your proposal and analysis. Communicate your economic proposal in a logically structured and concise manner, writing content clearly with correct
Stratification is the geographical idea of strata - shake layers in regular procedures. While in human science, the idea of stratification swings to allude to the distinctive strata of social gatherings and their game plans. Social stratification is a specific type of social imbalance which includes influence, distinction and riches. We can discover in our lives that one gathering may possess and appreciate more financial assets than another, or it might be held in high regard, or it might be in a situation to boss different gatherings around. The investigation of social stratification is to investigate how is the progressive system shaped inside the general public, how are social assets unequally disseminated and how these diverse gatherings identify with each other. Clearly, the course of action of various social gatherings inside a general public isn't generally similar to the game plans of shake in the world's hull as there are visit and different collaborations between the higher and lower social gatherings. Also, in opposition to strong shake layers, "rises" and "falls" occur both by gathering and by people in social framework. One gathering may ascend in power and status while another gathering may fall. People additionally climb and down to change their gathering possessions. So when we examine social stratification, we should focus on its normal for collaboration and portability. Any disregard would prompt a false conclusion. Speculations of Social Stratification Social stratification is certainly not another conceived idea. Long back in old China, "Li" was viewed as an extraordinary subject on organizations and conduct which gave a strict division and tenets of social classes. In "Han Shu-Monograph on Food and Currency ", individuals were stratified in a diving request of researchers, laborers, specialists and representatives. In the west, the most punctual exchange on social stratification can be gone back to old Greece. Plato showed a perfect state in "Republic" with three stable classes of freemen - Rulers or Philosopher Kings, Warriors or Guardians, and Workers, while Aristotle contended with a thought of the rich, poor people and the center. When discussing social stratification, we can simply locate these two names: Karl Marx and Max Weber. The exemplary proclamations on both social class and stratification give the establishment from which we can completely acknowledge current social flow and new bearings in the investigation of social disparity. The Marxist Perspective Karl Marx was conceived in the outcome of the European Revolution. By seeing the finish of the old time and the rise of another age, he found a similitude in all social orders - the ever presence of two social classes. He acquired Hegel's record of the contention amongst ace and slave, at that point took the possibility of two contradicted powers to dissect the type of the contention. Marx was the first to build up an orderly hypothesis on social class. A class is a social gathering whose individuals share a similar relationship to the methods for creation. People in a class demonstration similarly as well as tend to think similarly. There are two noteworthy social gatherings in all social orders, a decision one and a subject one. The connection between the two noteworthy classes is strife - exploiter and abused, oppressor and persecuted. Marx considered the general public as an arrangement of generation in view of the presence of these two inverse social classes. The decision class (the bourgeoisie) claim the methods for generation (arrive, capital, work power, structures and hardware) while subject class (the low class) must choose the option to work for the business people. Wage workers create products and enterprises yet get just subsisted rewards. Bosses take the items away to offer them at an esteem more prominent than their cost of generation. By collecting this surplus esteem, entrepreneurs get more riches and methods for creation to manage the framework. Capital is a social power. Political power originates from monetary power, from the control of methods for creation. The decision class develop the superstructure of society - the significant establishments, qualities and conviction frameworks, as indicated by the regular interests of the gathering. They look for insurance for their responsibility for of generation through laws and components which are positive to them. What's more, a misshaped picture of the real world (belief system) was developed to legitimize and honest to goodness the control of the decision class and to teach the mass abused average workers a bogus awareness of the idea of connection between social classes. Marx called attention to that there is a polarization of the classes through which the general public would increasingly part into the two awesome unfriendly camps. In spite of the fact that he didn't deny the individual portability between the social gatherings, the likelihood is little on the grounds that each gathering is generally shut. Singular development here and there does nothing to change the framework. Just by careful insurgencies would social be able to orders be recreated, can methods for creation be utilized by everybody and would social be able to equity be accomplished. Regardless of the considerable commitment to the investigation of social stratification, individuals brought issues up in Marxist approach as recorded underneath: Not all social orders are class social orders Class may not be the most fundamental social division The ascent of the white collar class and the fragmentary class structure Regular workers awareness and scholarly starry-eyed reasoning To take care of these issues, Neo Marxist researchers have tried numerous endeavors. Succeeding Marx's essential perspective of social stratification, the essential worry of current Marxian scholars has been to apply this Marxian perspective of society to modern social orders that have encountered change since Marx's chance, while likewise utilizing new strategies for sociology research to approve a portion of the chief Marxian ideas. For example, Gramsci blamed dehumanizing viewpoints for current private enterprise and pushed more training on common laborers to create scholarly people among them. Poulantzas thought the fracture of class structure was a characterizing normal for late private enterprise, so any examination must handle the new group of stars of interests and power. Basic Marxist, Wright, did some exact research on social stratification. Motivated by other's works, he acquired the idea of abilities and characterized class in connection to the gainful framework: Capitalists, chiefs, laborers and the frivolous bourgeoisie. The Weberian Alternative Max Weber contributed the most to improvement of stratification hypothesis since Marx. He was said to have had a discourse with Marx yet got distinctive conclusions. Marx saw classes in financial terms, while man does not take a stab at influence just keeping in mind the end goal to advance himself monetarily. He extended Marx's standard of class division to a multidimensional view.>GET ANSWER