Using an article from a mainstream media outlet, identify an issue that could be a concern for public health. Do not use articles or information from blogs, tabloids or un-edited sources. Use mainstream media sources such as Reuters, the Associated Press, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, Time Magazine, Newsweek, The Economist, National Public Radio (NPR), CNN, or BBC.
Why the topic is an issue for public health and what is the impact
Which institutions, groups, and/or individuals are affected by this issue
Which sociological perspective(s) could be used to understand why the health issue exists and/or persists
What type of social change would be needed in order to address the issue? Which social institutions should be involved
Dynamic from the inquiry given, on the reason to guidance on Arnold, it is imperative and critical to see if or not an agreement hosts been framed between the gatherings included so the locus standi of Arnold can be followed. Subsequently, with the foundation of locus standi, Arnold may then can make a move on issues he hosts experienced to the gatherings. It is essentially showing that, there must be a shared understanding which is lawfully enforceable between gatherings included. In another word, there must be a presence of agreement promotion idem. Whereby Lord Wilberforce a state on this issue in The Eurymedon as underneath:-  "… English law, having subscribed to a somewhat specialized and schematic teaching of agreement, in application adopts a down to earth strategy, regularly at the expense of constraining the realities to fit uneasily into the stamped openings of offer, acknowledgment, and thought… " In rundown, In request to guarantee cures, a substantial contract will comprise of offer, acknowledgment, and thought whereby this guarantees and that gives locus standi to the inquirer to do legally binding activity towards the respondent. The issue in this inquiry would look for an assessment on whether the announcement made is a term or portrayal. On the off chance that it is a term, it might prompt break of agreement ; while, on the off chance that it is portrayal, it is basic to look for cures accessible for the petitioner. Set up the Contractual Relationship with the petitioner Along these lines, it very well may be meant that the inquirer, Arnold must have demonstrate his legally binding association with the primary litigant, William to maintain his case on his disaster occurrence since he considers the arrangement given by William an awful one. It is then presented that, William can be classified as an offeree whereby his enquiries is simply only a challenge to treat since he is simply evidently making a solicitation because of his needs. A challenge to treat, according to Treitel : – "… When parties consult with the end goal of making an agreement, numerous primer correspondence may go between them before a positive offer is made… " Based on the reality given, Arnold is for sure vigilant for a house in the recently assembled Kenwood Park and looked for William's counsel who is a house agent. Thus, it is presented that Arnold is making an Invitation to treat in lieu of an offer like what has been shown on account of Gibson . While, on another hand, in the light of Storer v Manchester, in understanding to offer as characterized by Professor Treitel, William has explicitly demonstrate his ability by giving Arnold specifics of that house.  superficially, authoritative relationship accordingly settled.>GET ANSWER