• Summarize your selected article by stating the following:
o Introduction and reason for selecting the article.
o Ideas or thoughts presented by the article.
o Your analysis of the article and a critique.
o Conclusion that may be derived from the article.
• Describe a situation or scenario with the identified issue(s) that would apply in a hospital imaging/radiology department
• Explain how you can apply the lessons learned from that quality improvement project in your selected article to solve the identified issue(s).
o Examples of the lessons learned could be the entire QI project, QI tools, QI strategies, QI methodologies, QI team composite, which you can use to streamline workflow, redesign jobs, and more.
as be certain about their decision in buying private firms, which are tough to value(Capron and Shen, 2007). Nevertheless, Capron and Shen (2007) also record the factors that have negative repercussions on the returns. Age of the company, targets size when not in contrast with the acquirer size and also whether the company has intangibles in particular. These factors seem reasonable. The hostility of target management can also be spotted negative in Schwert (2002), while not noteworthy in Moeller, Schlingemann, and Stulz (2005). The Arcelor-Mittal merger was completely political (The International Herald Tribune, February 21st, 2006. p. 3), with target management for which the European politicians bravely opposed the death at the start. The political factors are important here as they were in the Citicorp-Travellers merger (Otchere and Mostopo, 2007), and they should certainly be taken into consideration. The positive factors stated by Capron and Shen (2007) dealt with whether the target was profitable prior to the merger and whether it was based on the United States. According to their research both the location or market choice and profitability are the primary factor for the acquirer and target returns. With the merger of Mittal Steel with Arcelor, Laxmi Mittal formed the largest steel maker in the world. This merger was sleek. The procedure displayed how the acquisition price could be immensely increased in favour of the shareholders of the target,also how some defense mechanisms can rebound. It also had a fair share of suspense arising from the counter bid and some international intrigue.>GET ANSWER