What is the existing fashion industry like in this city? Is there a history of fashion manufacturing/fashion industry in this city? Is there a history of fashion weeks?
Show examples of the latest collections from these designers. Describe their individual design aesthetics.
How are their brands doing? How large is the impact of their products on the marketplace? Do they supply the local market or are they recognized internationally? Are they focused on smaller collections or have they expanded into other areas (accessories/cosmetics/fragrances/home goods?)
Who is their target market? What is their average price point for their products?
Where were these designers trained? Did they study their craft in their home country, in Europe, the UK or the US? Did they apprentice for a local designer or a Parisian couture designer? Are they self-taught or did they learn from professionals?
Do they use traditional cultural references when designing their collections? If so, how is this incorporated into their designs?
What is the role of social media in expanding their brands internationally? How do these designers get the attention of the international press?
Does this city already have a large international fashion presence? If so, how do the local independent designers make their mark in a crowded fashion industry?
In the future, will this city continue to be a dominant player in the international fashion scene? Will these designers continue to build their brands with their own distinctive aesthetics?
Are these designers looking to the future in innovative ways? Do they experiment with new fibers and textiles? With technological advances? Are they engaged with issues of sustainability or eco-fashion?
On the counterbalance, the issue of open ethics and universal exchange turns out to be a hazardous. Open ethics contrast between states, the relativity will undoubtedly strife with standards and guidelines set out in universal practice. Article XX(a) as an exclusion is intended to enable a country to partake in the universal exchange while safeguarding certain parts of its power over it's household, political and legitimate order.It is an arrangement that keeps up self-protection. The issue of open ethics welcomes a feeling of equivocalness, widening its extent of utilization, it winds up vital to underline a reason for an understanding of it's importance inside the setting of worldwide exchange. The issue is there have been couple of choices and insightful articles addressing this exception. In US-Gambling (2005) the expressed that the term open ethics indicates models of good and bad direct kept up by or for the benefit of a network or country, the substance of the idea of open ethics can fluctuate from part to part, contingent on a scope of components, including winning social, social ,moral and religious qualities and individuals ought to be given some degree to characterize and apply for themselves the idea of open ethics in their particular domains, as per their own frameworks and sizes of qualities. This definition was embraced by the board in China-Publications and Audio-visual items (2010). The board at that point set the foundation for a GATT conflicting measure to be legitimized under Article XX(a) it expressed the measure must be intended to ensure open ethics and important to satisfy the that arrangement objective. The absence of law with this article will undoubtedly make issues later on. Unmistakably it is difficult to set a pattern for what is ethically right or off-base. This special case is exclusively gone for keeping up the sovereign respectability of a part. Article XX (b) The extent of section XX (b) isn't conclusive anyway unmistakably clean and phytosanitary measures were the key measures that possessed the brains of the draftersThis is clear in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (the Sps Agreement) where the introduction states; Preamble to the Sps Agreement that alludes to Article xx (b): "Wanting thusly to expand rules for the use of the arrangements of GATT 1994 which identify with the utilization of sterile or phytosanitary measures, specifically the arrangements of Article xx(b)" This article concerns measures that are 'important to ensure human, creature or vegetation or wellbeing'. Law on the use of Article XX (b) depends on three prerequisites: (I) Whether the strategy reflected in the measure falls inside the scope of strategies intended to accomplish the goal of "securing human â€¦ life or wellbeing". At the end of the day, regardless of whether the measure is one intended to accomplish that wellbeing strategy objective; (ii) whether the measure is "vital" to accomplish said target; and (iii) whether the measure is connected in a way reliable with the chapeau of Article XX. The prerequisite is generally direct and hasn't made issues with understanding. The adjudicators must decide whether a hazard exists and dissect the level of hazard caused by the product. This hazard needs to have an immediate connection to the measures taken, to do this, the Appellate Bodies have analyzed, the outline and structure of the measure and it has turned out to be clear that the measures attempted to accomplish this goal are wide. In Japan-Alcoholic Beverages II the Appellate Body expressed: "the point of a measure may not be effortlessly determined, by and by, its defensive application can frequently be recognized from the outline, the engineering and the noteworthy structure of a measure" In Brazil-Retreaded Tires (2007), Brazil presented a claim that the collection of waste tires makes an ideal rearing ground for illness conveying mosquitoes which represented a generous hazard through the transmitting of infections, for example, dengue and yellow fever. The gathering of waste tires likewise made the danger of tire fires and dangerous draining. Brazil contended additionally contended that the hazard postured to creatures was high because of mosquito-borne illnesses and various poisonous synthetic concoctions and substantial metals contained in the pyrolytic oil discharged from tire flames. The board acknowledged Brazil's contention and presumed that, Brazil's Policy of decreasing presentation to the dangers to human, creature or vegetation or wellbeing emerging from the collection of waste tires falls inside the scope of arrangements secured by Article XX (b). The relationship between's a measure and an approach can be showed from the investigation of the goal. Measures that have no subjective relations are regularly required to satisfy the arrangement objective on wellbeing approaches. The degree is expansive and can without much of a stretch welcome defensive measures under the pretense or Article XX (b). Besides For a measure to fall under the ambit of Article XX (b), needs to meet the need prerequisite and meet the prerequisites of the chapeau. likewise the depiction of the 'need prerequisite regarding the chapeau.However all together comprehend the need necessity inside the significance of Article XX(b) the Appellate body in Brazil-Retreaded tires expressed that, a board must think about the significance of the interests or qualities in question, the degree of the commitment to the accomplishment of the measure's target and it's exchange limitation. In this adjusting approach, an adjust of probabilities considering every single pertinent factor helps the adjudicator achieve a proper choice. Anyway different writings contend this isn't an adjusting or proportionality test, rather it is a sensible test, regardless of whether a sensible controller could have embraced the measure it did. This approach is restricted and adopts on a cautious strategy, I don't concur with this view as it confines the privileges of a part to accomplish an arrangement objective. In this circumstance assurance of national interests particularly identifying with wellbeing arrangements. The more essential or critical the basic interests or qualities sought after, the less demanding it is acknowledge as a vital measure .For a situation where the goal is sought after by the measure is the safeguarding of human-life and wellbeing through the end, or lessening, of surely understood, and dangerous, wellbeing dangers postured, it is regarded to be of crucial significance and of the most noteworthy degree. These components convey weight to be decided of probabilities and their weight is straightforwardly relative to the seriousness being referred to. Then again, if an issue is thought to be extremely prohibitive on a global exchange, the more troublesome it will be to think about the issue as important. The Adjudicators will then turn and look if there is an elective measure that would accomplish a similar end yet is less prohibitive of trade. In Brazil-Retreaded tires (2007) as for an elective that is less prohibitive in exchange, the Appellate body found for this situation that it would be nonsensical for a part to apply an elective measure if that measure does not enable it to accomplish its coveted level of security as for the approach target sought after. This demonstrates the level of significance put on the authentic strategy objective, the board with regards to the assurance of human creature or vegetation and wellbeing. In spite of the fact that a measure may be prohibitive, as long as it meets the prerequisites under the chapeau it will legitimize its application. The measure of assurance for this situation is inside the watchfulness of the part actualizing the arrangement, individuals can anyway challenge that the measure isn't important to accomplish the coveted level of protection. The principle target Article XX (b) is the insurance of human and creature life, this anyway isn't straight forward as it appears, the shields set up are intended to keep individuals from utilizing this special case as a way to present prohibitive exchange rehearses. Article XX (d) The article legitimizes measures which are important to anchor consistence with household laws or directions which are not conflicting with GATT 1994.The area thinks about the national interests of individuals, the article perceives the power and enables measures to actualize laws that are not conflicting with GATT 1994. In Korea-Various Measures on Beef (2001)- For a situation that included the double retail framework intended to anchor consistence with the Unfair Competition Act the investigative body expressed that two components must be appeared for a measure to be legitimized. The measure must be intended to anchor consistence with laws that are not conflicting with GATT 1994 and the measure must be important to anchor such consistence. Dissimilar to measures that are utilized to actualize wellbeing approaches, Article XX(d) is utilized to anchor consistence of laws and not their destinations. The meaning of intended to anchor consistence was based on by the Appellate Body in Mexico-Taxes on soda pops (2006) . Where the board expressed a measure can be intended to anchor consistence regardless of whether the measure can't be ensured to accomplish its outcome with supreme assurance. From the above investigation, obviously Article XX(d) assumes a strong part. It puts accentuation on the anchoring of consistence as opposed to meeting the targets of the particular laws. The need necessity inside the importance of Article XX(d) may be met if there are no other elective means accessible to anchor compliance.>GET ANSWER