Discuss each perspective (or) paradigm; and provide an original example of each.
NOTE: You must know perspectives/paradigms thoroughly. The basis of sociology is understanding, and applying sociological paradigms. Our mission is to apply sociological perspectives to situations (crime, strikes, boycotts, education, dating, marriage, economy, etc) within society.
The Ferguson Police Department (FPD) is a law authorization office dwelling in Ferguson, Missouri. At present the association incorporates 45 charged officials and 17 non military personnel bolster staff for a sum of 62 workers (City of Ferguson, 2018). The FPD prides itself on their activities of ensuring Ferguson residents lives and property through the authorization of laws and laws, just as help with crisis medicinal administrations. Notwithstanding these administrations, the office additionally gives an assortment of network activities planned for averting wrongdoing. A portion of the projects incorporate the D.A.R.E. program, Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), and giving school Resource Officers (City of Ferguson, 2018). The FPD has had numerous issues in ongoing history, two of them being the absence of responsibility held by officials and absence of enhancement in the office prompting network doubt. History: The FPD was built up in 1894, that year Ferguson was joined into a city. In 2010, the city had a populace of 21,203 individuals with 67% being of African-American drop. The police office was not administered with portrayal of its nearby racial cosmetics with 94% of its area of expertise being white, alongside the Chief of Police (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). Until the 1960s, Ferguson was a "dusk town", which implies African Americans were prohibited from the City after dull. The City would close off the fundamental street from Kinloch, a poor, all-dark suburb, "with chain and development materials yet kept a subsequent street open during the day so servants and caretakers could land from Kinloch to positions in Ferguson."(The Making of Ferguson, 2016) About 10 years prior, the FPD had its originally separated occurrence prompting a string of numerous embarrassments. On September 20, 2009, Henry Davis, an African American male, was wrongly captured when Ferguson cops mistook him for another Henry Davis. At the point when Davis opposed entering the prison cell, an official speedily pushed him, to which Davis fought back by striking the official in the face. The other 3 officials cuffed Davis because of his savagery and the official he struck ran and kicked him in the head. At the point when lawful specialists got included the police gave them an inappropriate video recording of the occurrence and afterward asserted they had recorded over the real tape. Davis was then accused of decimation of property for seeping on the cops' outfits (Shapiro, 2014). This occurrence affected strain between the police and the residents of Ferguson, all the more explicitly, white officials and the African-American populace. The occurrence that put Ferguson on the middle phase of global news was the passing of Michael Brown on account of the FPD. On August ninth, 2014, a short encounter between official Darren Wilson and African-American resident, Michael Brown, occured in which Wilson apparently told Brown "to get the f*** off the road" while Brown and a companion were strolling out and about (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). The police demonstrated that Brown attempted to take the officials weapon and beat him with it while Wilson was still in his watch vehicle. Dark colored at that point fled from the official and a couple of seconds after the fact, a few shots were discharged by the official while Brown was supposedly confronting him with his hands brought up in an indication of accommodation. This brought about Brown kicking the bucket from shot injuries, around 20-30 feet from the site of the underlying battle. It was later uncovered that Brown was unarmed (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). This disaster spread everywhere throughout the world and was the first energy for the Black Lives Matter development. This started fights everywhere throughout the United States which concentrated on uncalled for treatment by law implementation to ethnic minorities (Hafner, 2016). Culture and Strategy While the official statement of purpose of the FPD is that "The Ferguson Police Department gives security of life and property in Ferguson through the implementation of laws and statutes and help with crisis restorative administrations." (City of Ferguson, 2018), it keeps on repudiating itself by showing a culture of misuse and bigotry. In a report managed by the Department of Justice, it was discovered that law authorization exercises were driven by strain to raise income, instead of by genuine causes. This incorporates adulterating reports, baseless traffic stops, and illicit inquiries. A few cases demonstrated that the risk of prison time was frequently used to constrain installment for minor infractions, for example, illicit stopping, yet when prison time was served it wasn't recorded by the court. This is a case of the unmistakable absence of responsibility that cops are dependent upon, enabling them to act in unlawful ways without any results, utilizing their uniform and identification as security (Berman, M., and Lowery, W. 2015). The way of life inside the FPD likewise cultivates and empowers bigotry, with generalizations against African-American residents being transparently passed around and followed up on. This racial inclination starts from the upper degrees of the board, appeared by Ferguson authorities, including police leaders and administrators, trading messages containing clear racial predisposition. For instance, one email conjectured that Barack Obama wouldn't stay as President for a really long time since "what dark man holds a stable employment for a long time." This bigot movement inside the FPD shows itself in its outside activities, in which there is clear oppression ethnic minorities. African-Americans represent 85% of traffic stops, 90% of references, and 93% of captures, notwithstanding just making up 67% of the populace (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). These charges are regularly unlawful in nature too, with the officials much of the time confining individuals without sensible doubt and capturing individuals without reasonable justification. These unlawful practices are just energized by administrators, as they are increasingly worried about the quantity of references and captures that officials produce, instead of the authenticity of the references and captures. One cop even conceded that he was prepared to capture when residents would decline to give ID, notwithstanding it being the residents' entitlement to do as such. Once more, these practices are energized inside the police office, and there is no framework to guarantee responsibility. Remarks made by an administrator propose that there are foundational measures incorporated with place that consider reports to go unwritten and unapproved, with 600 reports that had not been affirmed over a multi month time span in 2014 (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). By and large, the way of life at the FPD is one that energizes income age and bigotry, without any measures set up to consider officials responsible for their unlawful practices. Issue 1: Lack of Accountability for unlawful and exploitative activities The FPD's Chief of Police, who admitted to that preceding the Michael Brown occurrence, he believed that the connection between the office and the network was on favorable terms. The Chief of Police's absence of comprehension for the genuine condition of relations between the residents and the division says a lot to the absence of correspondence between floor-level representatives and upper-administration. This absence of correspondence effectively prompts an absence of responsibility because of a wide number of unlawful and unscrupulous FPD official activities not being accounted for (Department of Justice, 2015). FPD officials who misuse their capacity are once in a while considered responsible and infrequently answer for their own behavior. Before the shooting of Michael Brown, there were at that point various reports of FPD officials abusing African-American occupants of Ferguson by calling them racial slurs, physical animosity, and weapon viciousness. The African-American inhabitants documented various protests against the FPD officials, anyway these grievances were met with quiet. This reaction further caused office network relations to crumble to the point wherein larger part of Ferguson's occupants portrayed making a report to the police division as "purposeless" (Department of Justice, 2015). In the official FPD arrangement, it plainly expresses that officials must "never deter any resident from logging a grumbling." (City of Ferguson, 2018). This arrangement was accounted for to be legitimately negated by an anonymous FPD chief who more than once would not address grievances from Ferguson occupants, venturing to such an extreme as punishing FPD officials who took grumblings (1). In one occurrence, a City representative relates being "addressed by means of email" by a FPD commander for taking an objection . In another occasion, a man needing to report inordinate power being utilized by FPD officials was undermined with prison time if a protest was made. This refusal to acknowledge grievances could be taken as the FPD chief's refusal to take on obligations to play out their employments morally and to acknowledge responsibility for the FPD's unlawful and unscrupulous activities. Besides, the FPD commander presently can't seem to get any subsequent activities, and the underlying protests against the FPD were never logged or researched (Department of Justice, 2015). It ought to be noticed that the FPD's treatment of its residents impersonate Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment. In Zimbardo's jail reproduction, 24 understudies were part similarly and arbitrarily doled out the job of jail gatekeepers or detainee. Before all else phases of the trial, the 12 understudies chose to be detainees were mortified and castrated. This mortification emphatically emulates the manner in which the FPD officials obnoxiously misuse the African-American occupants of Ferguson. Moreover, while the watchmen weren't given any proper guidelines to be protects, they were given a sort of opportunity that enabled them to work inside free points of confinement. This opportunity converted into an absence of responsibility for the gatekeepers which thus brought about the watchmen being basically "liberated" from the repercussions of their activities too. The identification, uniform and shades went about as a sort of cover for the jail monitors. >GET ANSWER