Imagine you are assigned the task of presenting to a local community center recommendations to alleviate the following social problem:
– Criminal behavior among teens in the neighborhood.
Prepare a PowerPoint presentation, citing two to four sources in addition to the textbook, that addresses the following:
Explain how the selected social problem affects an individual on a micro level.
Next, explain how society, policies, and practices influence and affect this population.
provide recommendations to alleviate the selected social problem that involve community stakeholders:
– Local police – How can local police help alleviate this community problem?
– Local businesses – What can local businesses do to help alleviate this problem?
– Local schools – How can local schools get involved?
– Local churches/clergy – What can local churches or clergy do to help alleviate the problem?
Images may be included in the presentation, but be sure to keep all image sizes small file sizes for this presentation.
Table 1 demonstrates the 4, 5, 6 and 7 grams of ammonium chloride was tried three times to get the most exact outcome. These three outcomes were then partitioned to give a normal. The normal of the 6 and 7 grams of ammonium chloride in contrast with diagram 2 is solid on the grounds that the dissolvability of ammonium chloride increments with the temperature. The normal of the 4 and 5 grams of ammonium chloride in contrast with diagram 2 could be dependable however the level of blunder is too high for this to be worthy implying that there was a mistake in the consistency of the test. Diagram 1: 'Solvency of Ammonium Chloride' demonstrates the four midpoints of each trial of ammonium chloride, with a pattern line that predicts the dissolvability of ammonium chloride somewhere in the range of 0°C and 100°C. Likewise the diagram demonstrates that when you continue including increasingly ammonium chloride the temperature for it to disintegrate will increment, however just by a couple of degrees each time. Diagram 2: 'Acknowledged Values - Solubility of Ammonium Chloride' are the acknowledged estimations of the dissolvability of ammonium chloride. In contrast with diagram 1, the two charts have a bend, however diagram 1 has more bend than diagram 2, where the bend is extremely slight. Diagram 1 and 2 don't coordinate by any means, implying that there are blunders as well as inconsistences in this test. Table 1, 2 and Graph 'Solvency of Ammonium Chloride' all fit the hypothesis that ammonium chloride breaks up in water. When we coordinate every one of the outcomes in this analysis, they unmistakably don't coordinate the acknowledged qualities. The acknowledged qualities are tremendously unique as chart 1 demonstrates that 39.99 grams of ammonium chloride breaks up at 73.43°C and diagram 2 demonstrates that 39.99 grams of ammonium chloride disintegrates at approximately 28.12°C. The outcomes fit the hypothesis since each of the four trial of ammonium chloride broke up in water. The main factors that could have changed this result could have been the measure of substance in a dissolvable which is warmed to a particular temperature. At last diagram 1 clarifies as the temperature expands, so will the measure of ammonium chloride that breaks up. Blunders Conceivable blunders that could have happened amid the analysis are: the strong didn't break up appropriately, temperature could have been off-base amid the chilling off process, the recrystallization of the ammonium chloride in water was hard to judge and breakdown of gear could have caused mistakes. The motivation behind why the strong probably won't have broken down is on the grounds that the temperature probably won't have been sufficiently high or I didn't mix it enough. On account of an arbitrary mistake the strong probably won't have broken down yet the eye probably won't have possessed the capacity to see a little molecule even with a little amplifying glass. The reason the temperature could have been off-base is on the grounds that when I mixed the blend, the warmth from the base of the test tube would have blended with the cool temperature at the highest point of the test tube, implying that when you saw the primary precious stones showing up the temperature could have still been evolving. Amid the test the ammonium chloride arrangement from the primary preliminaries was reused to be utilized for promote preliminaries. This could have changed the virtue of the ammonium chloride since it appeared to be extremely unique to the ordinary ammonium chloride. This could imply that while the weight did not present an issue, it might have not been totally dry which could influence the outcomes. The glitch of hardware could have happened without my insight, for example, the adjust scale being wrong (e.g. the little void cupcake containers on the scale did not adjust at 0). Another glitch could have happened with the thermometer not working appropriately. The loss of ammonium chloride not dissolving could have brought down the solvency of the substance. The probability of the scale not working is low and could be considered an irregular mistake, yet in the event that it wasn't working the dissolvability of the substance would be lower than anticipated if there was less ammonium chloride and higher if there was more ammonium chloride. The recrystallization could have been precisely the same typical strong ammonium chloride or it could have weighted pretty much. This would make the appropriate response higher if the ammonium chloride measured more than it should. Generally I trust the outcomes and answers I recorded may have been a bit too high or even low, yet I unquestionably realize that they aren't correct. One approach to conceivably enhance the investigation is to utilize the correct measure of water and ammonium chloride to get an estimation of solvency (g/100mL). This would turn out to be more precise and would be more qualified in a recepticle, over the electric hot plate as the warmth would be scattered around the whole measuring glass. Encourage examinations that could be incorporated into this test could be discovering the immersed arrangement of ammonium chloride at a particular temperature. This would be great since it is likely that each gathering would get distinctive outcomes and need to clarify more in their dialog about blunders and on the off chance that they feel that their answer is legitimate or not. Upgrades One approach to potentially enhance the trial is to utilize the correct measure of water to get an estimation of dissolvability (100mL). This would turn out to be more precise and would be more qualified in a measuring utencil put on an electric hot plate as the warmth would be scattered around the whole recepticle. Promote examinations that could be incorporated could be discovering the immersed arrangement of ammonium chloride at a particular temperature. This would be great since it is likely that each gathering would get distinctive outcomes and need to clarify more in their exchange about blunders and on the off chance that they feel that their answer is precise or not. Conclusion In conclusion I found that 4, 5, 6 and 7 grams of strong ammonium chloride was solvent in water at various temperatures. The speculation that distinctive measures of ammonium chloride will break up in water at different temperatures was replied. The outcomes that I recorded weren't legitimate in light of the fact that they didn't coordinate the acknowledged qualities, however the outcomes were solid at times as they had an example and this example coordinated the acknowledged qualities.>GET ANSWER