Since 2013 there has been on-and-off talk of Sprint purchasing T-Mobile. (They are the third- and fourth-largest mobile phone carriers in the United States.) This move is led by Masayoshi Son, the chair of Japanese conglomerate SoftBank, which owns Sprint. Mr. Son is a bold entrepreneur who is known for his penchant for risk taking and desire to be a global leader in the telecommunications industry. If the merger ever goes through it would result in a merger of the third and fourth largest mobile phone carriers in the United States.
Most recently, it appears that the merger will not go through. But the fact that talk of this merger has been rumored for quite a long time suggests it must have been a very difficult decision for Masayoshi Son. Such a large-scale merger brings great benefits in allowing a combined Sprint/T-Mobile to compete with industry leaders AT&T and Verizon. But mergers are always very risky and require a huge amount of debt to finance, not to mention overcoming numerous regulatory hurdles.
For this assignment, thoroughly review the background materials on the Vroom-Yetton decision-making style model. This involves answering seven questions relating to a decision and using the results from the model to determine your decision-making style. Make sure you understand the model, including the seven questions and the path diagram that you follow in order to find the preferred leadership style. The Vroom-Yetton model allows you to choose between different levels of autocratic, consulting, or group decision-making styles.
After you have reviewed the required background materials including Vroom (1976) and Rigolosi (2005), do some research on Sprint’s decision whether or not to purchase T-Mobile and think about what kind of answers you would give to the seven questions involved in the Vroom-Yetton model. Here are some articles on the rumored Sprint/T-Mobile merger to get you started:
Gelles, D., & De La Merced, M. J. (2014, Jun 05). T-Mobile and Sprint zeroing in on merger. New York Times [ProQuest]
Yao, D. (2014). Moody’s: Sprint/T-Mobile merger faces negative free cash flow until at least 2018. SNL Kagan Media & Communications Report [ProQuest]
De La Merced, M. (2014, Aug 07). Sprint ends its attempt to purchase T-Mobile. International New York Times [ProQuest]
Once you have finished your research on the Vroom-Yetton model and on the merger, write a 4- to 5-page paper addressing the following issues:
Imagine you are Masayoshi Son and have to decide on which decision-making style to use. Go through the seven questions from the Vroom-Yetton model and give your answers based on what you think the main issues are in the decision of whether or not to purchase T-Mobile. Explain your reasoning behind each answer
Go through the diagram in the Vroom-Yetton model and, based on your answers to the seven questions from Question 1, see what kind of decision-making style is recommended for Masayoshi Son. Use the diagram (Figure 6.2) on page 118 of Rigolosi (2005). Are you surprised by this answer? Is it the kind of decision-making style you would personally recommend based on your own research?
Conclude your paper with a discussion of your own opinion as to the usefulness of the Vroom-Yetton model for choosing your decision-making style. Would you recommend that corporate executives receive training in this model? Is there any ways in which you think the model could be improved? Explain your reasoning
gains (Doug Plucknett, 2014), managers mostly pay interest inside the daily results produced, and if the 66b34c3da3a0593bd135e66036f9aef3 strolling undertaking effects have a right away effect on the targets that want every day be finished, which makes the manger has to be concerned about. Leaders basically are involved approximately the destiny statistics rather than thinking about what changed into in the beyond, they use âmain indicatorsâ on the way dayeveryday gain daily technologies, skilled labour and gaining new equipments that could lead them to advantage accurate marketplace share as well as increase the commercial enterprise. these main indicators are an intrinsic part of the commercial enterprise shape, these signs cause a economic wreck of a margin of or much less than that. -Leaders are suitable motivaevery dayrs, leaders know by means of what approach are you able to encourage humans, day-to-day inspire employees leaders cause them to part of any decision making system, which cause them to feel part of the agency. they're day-to-day communicaevery dayrs in addition to accurate listeners. personnel in an organization are engaged in doing one precise mission in an organization however leaders use job rotation or other strategies which includes task enrichment & expansion daily make them feel greater challenged and gaining a few new abilties which even facilitates in motivating. however it does now not suggest managers do now not motivate people, they do, but in terms of finance together with an worker gaining 30% extra over his income if he/she works additional time or gaining fringe benefits, âthese are repayment similarly day-to-day direct wages or salariesâ(IRS, 2014) along with motors. in the main managers are concerned about the consequences, how the business enterprise completed and evaluating with other beyond effects in phrases of output produced, additional time carried out by means of employees and mainly specializes in the profits won from the output. day-to-day get appropriate effects managers make use of those fringe advantages and inspire personnel day-to-day be more centered every day the obligations. but managers aren't top motivaeverydayrs as leaders however can be beforehand of the leader in motivating people via economic means as a leader can not provide such motivation techniques. -Managers tend every day observe predetermined policies and be really extra at ease with forms even as leaders are more creative and spontaneous. That also can suggest that managers are greater reactive and live inside the organizational obstacles. Leaders push the ones boundaries and are probably everyday be more proactive. The balancing of these two is essential in organizations because there may be a need everyday task the popularity quo to move forward but there may be additionally a need day-to-day keep a few structure every day hold a diploma of stability. The supervisor/leader combination facilitates everyday gain this stability. – The most important element of leaders is that, leaders tend everyday construct sturdy relationship between their followers/ crew individuals. The group members every day believe in management. Leaders involve their group members in choices and make each member agree with as if they remember, as though they make a disparity. This makes the fans trust that the leader has belief in them. that is what makes a pacesetter completely special from a manager (Kumle, 2006). Managers ensure certain essential dreams are met. In a number of approaches, a managerâs work could be very daily and daily because the managers are the ones who've daily make certain that every one obligations that are had to achieve a positive aim, are completed at a selected date and time, they cope with recurring things and set things day-to-day be so as (Romero, 2010). about Essay Sauce>GET ANSWER