Write a narrative essay in which you address and discuss the question and statement; During the 20th Century a number of blue-ribbon commissions, committees, and task forces reviewed the activities of American law enforcement and made similar reform recommendations throughout the century. Despite the recommendations, some critics claim law enforcement has not changed very much. In other words, the same problems are still there. Do you agree or disagree? Why?

 

 

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

Stagnation in Reform: The Enduring Challenges of American Law Enforcement

As I sat down on a crisp autumn afternoon, the sunlight filtering through the window, I found myself reflecting on the evolution of American law enforcement throughout the 20th century. With a steaming cup of coffee in hand and a stack of reports from blue-ribbon commissions scattered across my desk, I pondered the question: Despite numerous recommendations for reform, has law enforcement truly changed? My thoughts drifted to the voices of critics who argue that many of the same issues persist in the fabric of policing today.

The Cycle of Recommendations

Throughout the 20th century, America witnessed a series of commissions and task forces dedicated to evaluating law enforcement practices. Notable among these were the Wickersham Commission in the 1930s and the Kerner Commission in the 1960s. Each group meticulously examined the state of policing and offered comprehensive recommendations aimed at reforming practices, enhancing accountability, and fostering community relations.

The Wickersham Commission, for example, highlighted the rampant corruption and brutality within law enforcement during Prohibition, calling for measures like better training and oversight. Similarly, the Kerner Commission addressed racial tensions and violence during the civil rights movement, urging police reform to build trust within communities of color. The recommendations were often well-intentioned, envisioning a future where law enforcement could operate as a partner rather than an adversary to the communities they served.

A Disheartening Pattern

However, as I leafed through these reports, a troubling pattern emerged. Each commission made recommendations that echoed sentiments from previous inquiries. There were calls for improved training, better community engagement, and more transparent oversight mechanisms. Yet, despite these recommendations being laid out with clarity and urgency, many of the same issues that prompted their creation remained entrenched in American policing.

Take, for example, the persistent issue of police brutality. Incidents of excessive force have plagued American law enforcement for decades. The deaths of unarmed individuals like Rodney King in 1991 and George Floyd in 2020 ignited widespread outrage and calls for reform. Yet, the outcry following these tragedies felt eerily similar to the protests and demands for change that arose during earlier decades. The cyclical nature of these events raises a critical question: Why have so many recommendations failed to enact meaningful change?

The Disconnect Between Recommendations and Implementation

In my musings, I began to consider the disconnect that often exists between recommendations and their implementation. While commissions may identify problems and propose solutions, actual change requires commitment at multiple levels—political will, funding for training programs, community involvement, and cultural shifts within police departments.

Many departments struggle with systemic issues such as inadequate funding or resistance to change from within. The culture of “us versus them” can create an environment where officers feel compelled to protect their own rather than seek accountability for misconduct. This can lead to a reluctance to embrace reforms that would improve relationships with the communities they serve.

The Role of Technology and Social Media

As I reflected further, I recognized that technology has also played a role in shaping public perception and accountability within law enforcement. The rise of social media has amplified voices advocating for justice while simultaneously exposing instances of police misconduct in real-time. Documented incidents often go viral, leading to public outcry and demands for accountability. However, this increased visibility has not always translated into lasting reform.

Many police departments have adopted body-worn cameras as a response to public pressure. While these cameras have the potential to enhance accountability, their effectiveness often hinges on proper usage and transparency regarding footage access. Reports indicate that some departments continue to resist comprehensive oversight on camera footage or fail to implement protocols ensuring accountability.

A Dual Perspective

Ultimately, my contemplation led me to adopt a dual perspective on this issue. I agree with critics who assert that many fundamental challenges persist within American law enforcement despite numerous reform recommendations. The cycle of recommendations often lacks sufficient follow-through and commitment from law enforcement agencies and policymakers alike.

However, it is essential to recognize that some progress has been made over the decades. Initiatives aimed at community policing have taken root in various departments across the country, focusing on building relationships with community members and fostering trust. Training programs emphasizing de-escalation techniques and cultural competency are becoming more prevalent.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

In closing, while I acknowledge that some enduring challenges remain in American law enforcement, I also see glimmers of hope for meaningful reform. As society continues to grapple with issues of racial justice and police accountability, it is crucial for law enforcement agencies to reflect on past recommendations while actively engaging with communities to foster trust.

The road ahead will require unwavering commitment from all stakeholders involved—law enforcement officials, policymakers, community leaders, and citizens alike—to break free from the cycle of stagnation. Only through genuine collaboration can we hope to transform law enforcement into an institution that serves as a force for good in our society rather than a source of division. As I sipped my coffee in quiet contemplation, I realized that change is not just possible; it is imperative for a more just future.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer