Stereovision in strabismus
Order Description
T?????????????????????his is instructions from my supervisior <<Hi I said you should in your method write your hypothesis – what you expect. If you find one that strab similar to controls, what does that mean. If strab have smaller or wider range than controls, what does that mean? Also, you should put in your methods, the record sheets you would use to record everything and how you measure magnitude of strabismus and fusional reserves etc. Then you say that there are no results yet as the programming stage became stuck about 1 month ago due to waiting for a response from the hardware manufacturer. You can say the limitation is that you are only checking on aspect of stereopsis. Cannot have a conclusion – can have next steps.>> I will attached all documents. please try to cover everythings if I found any useful articles I will enclosed it to you later . This research is consider a pilot study. what you have done before is quite good, but you should add more information as she mentioned in her instructions you need to try and understand their discovery, in these studies KANE, D., GUAN, P. & BANKS, M. S. 2014. The limits of human stereopsis in space and time. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 1397-1408. Read, J.C.A., 2015. Stereovision and strabismus. The Scientific Journal of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists, 29(2), pp. 214-224. Norman, J.F., Norman, H.F., Craft, A.E., Walton, C.L., Bartholomew, A.N., Burton, C.L., Wiesemann, E.Y. and Crabtree, C.E., 2008. Stereopsis and aging. Vision research, 48(23-24), pp.2456-2465. O’CONNOR, A. R. & TIDBURY, L. P. 2018. Stereopsi?????????????????????s: are we assessing it in enough depth? Clinical and Experimental Optometry. and how it relates to what we are trying to discover. Also, you can make predictions (hypothesis) about what you expect to find for people with strabismus. Because any experiment should have an hypothesis. Mei ————————— you just need to write your report. Because Dr Ryan cannot get the program to work at all, we only need to modify the aim to design a test of stereopsis under challenging conditions to compare controls and people with strabismus. Your results would then be the design. You need to cover more in the background – i.e. What do we already know about normal stereopsis and stereopsis in people with strabismus? What methods have been used to measure in the past? You can use tables to do this. Because in the discussion, you need to compare your values with what has been discovered in the past. you should in your method write your hypothesis – what you expect. -If you find one that strabismus similar to controls, what does that mean. If strabismus have smaller or wider range than controls, what does that mean? Also, you should put in your methods, the record sheets you would use to record everything and how you measure magnitude of strabismus and fusional reserves etc. Then you say that there are no results yet as the programming stage became stuck about 1 month ago due to waiting for a response from the hardware manufacturer. You can say the limitation is that you are only checking on aspect of stereopsis. Cannot have a conclusion – can have ?????????????????????next steps.
