Imagine you are considering the possibility of operating a small business or practice related to health care, either as a provider of some sort of care or as a service intended to support various provider organizations in their care-delivery activities.
Describe the kind of entity you plan to establish by stating the service or services you propose to deliver and the kinds of clients or customers you would be serving. Write a few sentences offering compelling reasons for your proposed venture, explaining why you believe it is needed and by whom it is needed. Also discuss any competition you foresee. Develop an estimate of how much money you will require to become established in business, and state how you would finance your venture. Also discuss your plans for maintaining your budget. Create a mission or vision statement for your organization.
The World is Flat," by Thomas Friedman Distributed: 23rd March, 2015 Last Edited: second January, 2018 Disclaimer: This article has been put together by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert article scholars. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any suppositions, discoveries, conclusions or suggestions communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. "The World is Flat," by Thomas Friedman, accounts the deluge of countless players on the worldwide financial stage that has made a solid power that is as of now influencing Americans. Friedman trusts that these approaching changes can possibly create both positive and negative outcomes. A case that delineates the scope of Friedman's examination is his contention about the effect of the website air pocket and its possible bust. He proposes that in spite of the fact that the bust was awful for a few financial specialists, it ended up being great in opening up worldwide markets. The overcapacity which created the bust additionally delivered low costs for broadcast communications, consequently empowering players from littler financial districts to take an interest in an amusement typically held for greater players. Friedman portrays a few cases of various firms in these districts that have developed to give innovation administrations to American business. One illustration, including an Indian firm that does fundamental expense form work for an American bookkeeping organization, mirrors his view that in spite of the fact that cost preferences are essential, the genuine essentialness are the focused extents and advancements made conceivable by this new innovation. A standout amongst the most critical acumens of his book is that Americans ought to become acclimated to the way that the United States won't long remain the most grounded player on the field. From my perspective, the United States have seriously required a decent dosage of modesty, and these worldwide movements Friedman recognizes guarantee to move us that way. While at the same time numerous sections point toward the coming of an arrangement of worldwide collaboration where nobody player claims predominance, numerous others accept a win-lose situation, in which Americans will be commanded by the Indians and Chinese on the off chance that they don't start acting responsibly. Friedman begins one of his parts with a short relating of the end result for America's past world predominance in b-ball, portraying it as an incredible allegory for what is going on in the worldwide economy. Rather than getting a handle on the new levelness of the worldwide financial framework, he wishes for the greatness days when the United States was still big cheese. He composes time after time as though the main decision Americans have is to play and win, or to be failures. This inclination is especially plainly obvious in his successive references to the assurance of high-stakes rivalry. "There is no opportunity to rest; we need to work harder; the Europeans are reprobate since they esteem having more occasions." Friedman composes as if this isn't a choice, however there are decisions, or there should be. On the off chance that the present framework lessens a large number of those decisions, maybe we should change the framework. Globalization is about effectiveness. In any case, as Friedman concedes, there's something else entirely to it than that. He considers the anxieties and drawbacks in globalization in the part titled "The Great Sorting Out," yet despite everything he appears to be hesitant to genuinely investigate the results. Friedman appears to be unwilling to recognize that the framework is altogether influenced by worldwide political structures or the nonappearance thereof. For instance, he specifies the requirement for the United States to build up a vitality freedom arrangement, particularly to adapt to the normal tremendous increments in the interest for vitality by China and India. However, the greater part of this discourse happens in a section on the most proficient method to kick off American science and innovation training so we can remain aggressive. Friedman completes a truly great job of recognizing globalization's effect on laborers. He perceives that the world isn't yet extremely level yet on the grounds that there are as yet a great many individuals who are not ready to contend in the worldwide market. In any case, he is as yet hesitant to point at auxiliary issues. Friedman offers an assessment of how the non-vote based political structures of the Middle East do exclude a great part of the populace who live there from the advantages of development and change. I should imagine that we require more than trust; The United States needs to create open approaches that have worldwide achieve, that verify that in any event the key players are at the worldwide eating table can helpfully address a portion of the notable issues. In the event that the cost of these arrangements creates lost productivity, we ought to have a genuine discussion about this exchange off, as opposed to expecting that effectiveness dependably wins.>GET ANSWER