Supply Chain Performance Measurement and Financial Analysis Questions 1. “Performance measurement for logistics managers is relatively recent. Their focus was previously directed toward other managerial activities.” Do you agree or disagree with these statements? Explain your position. 2. It is generally recognized that organizations go through several phases on the path to developing appropriate supply chain metrics. Discuss the stages of supply development for supply chain metrics. Choose which of the stages of evolution you think would be most challenging for an organization. Explain your choice. 3. Using a spreadsheet computer software program, construct a supply chain finance model and calculate the profit margin; ROA; inventory turns; and transportation, warehousing, and inventory costs as a percentage of revenue for the following: Sales = $200,000,000 Transportation cost = $12,000,000 Warehousing cost = $3,000,000 Inventory carrying cost = 30% Cost of goods sold = $90,000,000 Other operating costs = $50,000,000 Average inventory = $10,000,000 Accounts receivable = $30,000,000 Cash = $15,000,000 Net fixed assets = $90,000,000 Interest = $10,000,000 Taxes = 40% of (EBIT-Interest) Current liabilities = $65,000,000 Long-term liabilities = $35,000,000 Stockholders’ equity = $45,000,000 4. Using the supply chain finance model developed for Study Question 3, calculate the impact on profit margin; ROA; inventory turns; and transportation, warehousing, and inventory costs as a percentage of revenue for the following scenarios: Scenario A Transportation costs increase = 20% Warehousing costs decrease = 5% Average inventory decrease = 10% Scenario B Warehousing is outsourced with the following: Net fixed assets reduced = 20% Inventory reduced = 15% Warehousing costs = $0 Transportation costs reduced = 5% Outsourcing provider costs = $2,500,000 5. Develop a strategic model to depict the scenarios given in Questions 3 and 4.
The objective personality's significant and unique hypotheses since time immemorial has been the idea of truth, a profoundly established philosophical conundrum, whose idea itself has changed the reasonable esteem controlled by the territories of learning. Truth itself engrosses a considerable job in our day by day discussions, however its multi-dimensional nature has bewildered even the most significant scholars like Plato and Aristotle and in addition ongoing thinkers who have flopped in revealing this puzzle lying at the core of human culture. In spite of the fact that the word 'truth' is labeled with the reason for an utilitarian job, we people shape it into a frame perceived by the theoretical system of our human personality, also called an outline. Subsequently the topic of the estimation of truth engaged with any announcement is accepted to be an outcome of the social constructivism dependent on convictions and our raising. Over the previous years, truth has been managed separately regarding its methodology towards a variety of information territories. The 'degree' is a supporting of the different viewpoints that fact holds in an assortment of zones of information. Accordingly, it demonstrates not just a distinction as truth yet additionally a likeness engaged with interpreting the presence of truth. My article dares to disclose the degree to which truth has been given changed centrality in three particular zones of information; arithmetic, expressions and morals as far as the attributes which characterize them. Since the unique idea of truth has presented to be a general problem, different hypotheses have been defined to check reality estimation of any announcement. Arithmetic is frequently viewed as the dialect of certaintyand surely understood for its dependability and dynamic idea. What influences mathematicians and savants to trust that science is nearest to the outright truth is its legitimate structure of philosophy and judgments, and its effect on feasibility to accomplish a totally right or off base answer. The scientific truth is bound by specific standards and hindrances which envelop this territory of information, consequently a more compelled methodology based on unadulterated rationale, and deductive-thinking impacts reality engaged with a numerical angle. "In arithmetic an announcement must be valid or false" is an old hat saying and mirrors the general understanding which characterizes the result. Most mathematicians concur the way that the set hypothesis shapes the firm establishment whereupon the unpredictable structure of math has been raised. In any case, what interests these mathematicians is that can such a dynamic zone have any genuine applications? A look into the historical backdrop of arithmetic would most likely attest the above inquiry. For instance, various hypotheses in the past were believed to be a simple hypothetical wonder however today see a firm position in reality. The Non-Euclidian Geometry was first considered as a hopeful part of arithmetic, however today has cut its way into the hypotheses of relativity. In the present worldwide circumstance, the number of inhabitants on the planet has crossed the six billion check and compromises to exponentially advance up through the populace graphs. For instance in China, with the end goal to control the populace surge in the nation, the administration has squeezed after having one infant for every family. From the numerical view-point, the target truth lies in the way that with the end goal to reestablish the living space around us it is fundamental to make such a stride in light of a legitimate concern for the who and what is to come. From the moral position, their form of truth is totally antipodal on the grounds that the premise of a reality esteem in this announcement is an impression of ones passionate self instead of a projection of a coherent personality. In morals, henceforth, a contention is a talk undertaking where individuals should be influenced what I accept as opposed to demonstrating the certainty associated with my recommendation. I feel that my perception into this precedent is a projection of the degree to which one occasion holds an alternate position from the exhibition of reality esteem supporting the case. What characterizes an obvious line of distinction among math and morals as deciphered from the above model is the clashing idea of good suppositions and that there are no discernible actualities to construct reality esteem in light of in a moral perspective. The distinction in good suppositions among individuals might be lead by the intellectual mechanical assembly of the person. Since morals is viewed as a matter of individual concern, affected by past learning and encounters of the individual, the ethical contrasts would clarify that in morals, there is no hidden truth to be found. In any case, what characterizes profound quality in morals is the situation of moral relativism, the conviction that moral view-indicates are relative some culture. A standout amongst the most angry good issues within reach is premature birth. Each individual concurs the restorative systems which come full circle into a fetus removal. In any case, there is by all accounts a similarly loathsome reaction with regards to concurring the ethical quality of premature birth. So, the matter of fetus removal has its concurrence on therapeutic science however doesn't contact upon the zone of restorative morals. Along these lines, at all purposes of time, the whole situation is a general portrayal of an announcement and it is an appearance yet not the truth. I have constantly watched myself making empty and additionally sincerely determined guarantees and dependably have the announcement "Guarantees should be kept" at the back of my brain. This is by all accounts an ethical standard, however it can't be arranged as an accurate case. Be that as it may, on close perception, reality factor inside the announcement demonstrates close relations between such an announcement and a scientific suggestion. In the event that the marvel of guarantee is known and the genuine substance of its commitment is comprehended, there exists a connection between thoughts. In spite of the fact that relativism and subjectivism are parallel in specific terms, workmanship as a region of information has been considered as a portrayal of the real world. Friedrich Nietzsche apothegm "We have craftsmanship all together not to kick the bucket of reality", reluctantly affirms the way that this world has workmanship with the end goal to experience reality. Despite the fact that the methods for knowing have cleared the way for the course to achieving truth in these three regions of information, where thinking, feeling and recognition have commanded the way to deal with a definitive reality in math, morals and expressions individually, reality esteem in every one of its announcements has a specific similitude. The type of presumptions which are used in ended up being genuine is a repetitive perception in each of the three zones of information. The sort of truth that workmanship is endeavoring to pass on to us might be totally not the same as the ay an individual may see it. Subsequently how would we judge a bit of craftsmanship in the event that it holds totally unique conclusions in the psyches of 2 individuals? When seeing a gem, it might summon a feeling, and the acknowledgment of this feeling might be a sign of reality. In any case, there is a typical view-point among individuals that photography has upset the manner in which truth is seen since it depicts a significantly more exact image of the whole situation. Since the photograph is a negligible perception and appearances are really tricky. It is set up that reality engaged with a depiction isn't partial however a projection of the people individual translation, henceforth talks about the watcher. Truth as far as workmanship is an impression of excellence and is totally without any type of rationale. Truth has been molded from numerous points of view relating as per the general inclination of the individual challenging reality in his brain. There is one single truth in connection to an announcement and through the investigation into three unmistakable regions of learning, I have comprehended that the technique for moving toward the subject is the thing that characterizes reality associated with it. Plato himself contended, as it were, that there is a clear response for anything to be viewed as great or awful, in the event that one activities his deductive thinking abilities rather than what the Sophists trusted that such articulations involve abstract truth and is completely founded on human translation and his craving.>GET ANSWER