Sustainable development can be defined as the challenge of meeting human needs for natural resources, industrial products, energy, food, transportation, shelter and effective waste management while conserving and protecting environmental quality and the natural resource base essential for future development.
Based on this definition, write an essay that answers the following questions:
1/ Do engineers have a moral duty to design sustainable technologies, as opposed to non-sustainable technologies? Explain.
2/ How might this duty extend to global engineering practice? Explain.
3/Which ethical theory (i.e. respect for persons, utilitarianism, virtue ethics, or elements of principlism) that we discussed in class would tend to support this duty? Explain by making an argument for your answer. Use only one theory, the best fit for this case in your judgment.
the molecule besieging, however it could have been dangers from Soviet Russia or the disconnection and incalculable bombings of Japan. The choice to drop the bombs may appear to be unfeeling. Americans and the united powers considered Japanese to be as second rate and subhuman. President Truman even called them "monsters". So how was it alright to drop the bombs on Japan out of scorn for their race? The view of what prejudice implies has radically changed since the 1940's, yet America certainly had a couple of huge motivations to detest the Japanese individuals. Japan began the contention with America themselves by shelling Pearl Harbor and murdering 3000 Americans. Furthermore, the cases of the bombings being coldhearted and coldblooded don't bode well when one takes a gander at Japan's dull past. Those cases suggest that Japan is the essential injured individual. This isn't correct on the grounds that the Japanese were additionally exceptionally barbarous to Americans. They lead demise walks and executed numerous American detainees. Japan had likewise murdered a large number of regular citizens during the war. They are despised by China, Korea, and other Asian Countries for the bombings and slaughters they submitted in the war. They accepted that they were over all other Asian Countries, which legitimized their fierce conduct. They had a comparative mentality to Nazi Germany, and accepted that Japanese individuals were the ace Nationality . Generally speaking, America was unquestionably legitimized in their choice to drop two nuclear bombs on Japan to end World War II. The grisly impacts of the bombs indicated the remainder of the world what the bombs were able to do, which helped a few countries rule against utilizing atomic weapons. On the off chance that one can look past the devastation the bombs caused in Japan, one can unmistakably observe that it was essentially the most sane decision to end the war. The bombs spared American lives, finished the exorbitant and bleeding war, and prevented the majority of the world from going to atomic fighting. In the event that it were not for the dropping of the bombs, the Soviet Union and>GET ANSWER