Below are four recordings of the song “Hound Dog.” One is the original version by Big Mama Thornton in 1953,
and the second is the cover version by Elvis Presley in 1956. Also included below are live performances of
each artist. Start by watching the live version by Big Mama Thornton to get an idea of what a wonderful
performer she was. Next, listen to the studio version – that’s the version Elvis heard. Then, listen to the studio
version that Elvis recorded. Finally, watch his live performance on the Ed Sullivan Show to get an idea of how
popular he was. Screaming teenaged fans didn’t start with the Beatles!
This is Big Mama Thornton’s “Hound Dog” – Live Version. The song ends at 2:35, but keep watching for an
extra bonus of a great jam with four blues harp players, including blues and R&B legend John Lee Hooker and
guitarist Buddy Guy.
Next we have Big Mama Thornton’s studio version:
Here’s Elvis Presley’s “Hound Dog” – Studio Version
Elvis’s version of “Hound Dog” performed live.
Let’s take a quick look at the lyrics
Big Mama Thornton’s version is very typical of rhythm and blues of the 1950s. The lyrics use sexual double
entendre to explain how the singer is tired of her lover’s one-track mind.
Here are the opening lyrics of Big Mama Thornton’s version:
You ain’t nothing but a hound dog,
Been snooping’ round my door,
You can wag your tail,
But I ain’t gonna feed you no more,
In Elvis’s version, the music is the same, but the lyrics have been cleaned up for his teenage audience. In his
version, the song really is about a dog:
You ain’t nothing but a hound dog,
Cryin’ all the time,
You ain’t never caught a rabbit,
And you ain’t no friend of mine.
Begin this activity by re-reading pages 92-95 in your textbook about the issue surrounding cover versions.
Then, consider the following questions:
Do you feel that cover versions were fundamentally racist, or do you feel covers were good business?
Were black artists ripped off, or were these cover versions understandable within the context of music business
practices of the day?
Lefebvre in his book on Production of Space contended that space is made by human in which they make their lives. These are molded by interests of classes, specialists, the grassroots, and other fighting powers, for example, interlinkage of geographic, condition, representative implications and schedules of life. Space is neither just acquired from nature nor dictated by laws. Space is a conceptual which speaks to the utilization of significant worth, rose out of the felt needs and inclinations of every day life.It is created and imitated through human expectations paying little respect to the results. Space itself is a generation or the other way around for example economies produce spaces, other than delivering products and enterprises relying upon the earth, modifications of nature and land of areas. Lefebvre's bring space into marxism premise of private enterprise which shapes space not simply to accomplish ideological outcomes or to continue proper conditions for generation on different circles however makes a market space whose continuous defiant development mirrored the supplement for advancement, responsive plan and ascent of homogenization among the industrialist that spared them from termination. Lefebvre sees that inside this space the quest for use versus trades esteems push the industrialist all around and into space that it compromises nature itself. He contended that specific merchandise that were once rare have gotten copious and the other way around. In any case, the very establishment, to be specific land, space, town and nation were forgotten about or ignore by the monetary circle as well as was even make most exceedingly awful by political circle. Lefebvre's called to make new spaces that necessary an arrangement between reproduced large scale structures of legislative issues and economy from one viewpoint and regular day to day existence on the other. This is to be done by pressurizing from the neighborhood levels or grassroots (resistance) where it will go up against the state in its job as coordinator of room to counter against the procedures, plans, and projects forced from above. The subject of the investigation Lefebvre is extensively seen as a Marxist mastermind who made a basic commitment to the request of time and history. Every single through hello there composed work, Lefebvre got a handle on the considerations of Heidegger to fathom our occasions anyway not something which could stay on. Space is conveyed in two different ways as a social course of action (method of generation) and mental advancement (origination) He fought that Heidegger's hypothesis on how the world is ambushed by innovation, is basic to examine of how space is made and experienced. For Lefebvre, Heidegger exhibits the best and the most exceedingly terrible of life progressed from the prior period and foreknowledge about the future . His work on the pith of development and its association with the cutting edge world is a significance. Both comprehended that it may not be possible to handle the issues of rationale from inside hypothesis, anyway that something different might be required. Lefebvre, along these lines, delineates countless his best-alluded to contemplations, for instance, the assessment of the age of room, and the assessment of consistently as a metaphilosophy. Lefebvre was political in the wide sense as exhibited in his composed neutralize Stalinism and supposition on political themes of room, plan, and spatial organizing. He discusses thories of state and assessments of state in the present day world where the Marxist considerations ought to be related to contemporary issues, for instance, the express, the relations among budgetary and political factors, the issues posed by advancement and improvement, towns and country, etc and basic takes a shot at patriotism, the administrative issues of differences and citizenship which are, as it were, dark. Heidegger thought on Christian Theology Religious philosophy is considered as the understanding and elaboration of feelings which are recognized as given, and scholar as a general rule feel obliged to decipher decidedly of their religous traditon. The philospher of religion is will without a doubt recognize as real the feelings of their strict traditon, yet he can't work in isolation from these traditons, beacuse there lies the object of his examination is to be found. It would be incredibly problematic if not unbelievable for the philospher to convey an out and out another religion, he ought to rather oversee what starting at now exists, notwithstanding the way that he is permitted to change this religion to a great degree. The scholar is been the gatekeeper of strict show, he has a lot to pick up from the mastermind as for the understanding of reality including God and the ideal and human relationship, anyway he moreover has something to teach to the philospher to be explicit how and why religion has showed itself the manner in which it has in his very own religion custom. As to heidegger's, reasoning explicitly, various christian researchers have found his thought accommodating for their explaination of christian feelings with outstanding refernce to the method for instinct (nature of reasoning) and language. Heidegger is hesitant to investiagte the significance of his contemplations for reasoning yet he causes an exclusion to this standard in his to assess of power. The association of 'Being' towards man, which Heidegger depicts the extent that relevation resembles the christian appreciation of God's association with man. Regardless of the way that it would apppear that Heidegger has appropraited some of these contemplations from christain strict reasoning, his non-mystical reinterpretation of these musings can be recognized by the researcher as a novel promise to the headway of christian strict theory The huge section of Heideggerian philosphical strict way of thinking , likewise with any way of thinking, would be the possibility of god. As we have seen, Heidegger has nothing positve to state with respect to God. Nevertheless, his criticsms of the extraordinary thought of God as the incomparable being, the essential the most astonishing quality, etc have vivified researchers to develope non metapysical thoughts of god. Heidegger's philosphy is noteworthy for the reinterpretation of various parts of christian strict way of thinking, for instance, Jesus christ, the assemblage, moral quality, organizations, etc ought to be left to the researchers themselves to pick. His treatment of strict subjects is critical for theory and for philosphy of religion and to the extent that his delineations of traditonal reasoning, man and god are exact , they ought to be consumed by the researcher. In this way, the full essentialness of heidegger's philosphy and theory as they participate to encourage the improvement of the strict conciousness of man. Heidegger's on Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Science Martin Heidegger has evaluated Kant's viewpoint in association with introspective philosophy exceptionally as opposed to his own specific philosophical perspective. Heidegger fought the issue of experience develops essentially bacause man's goes past himself and in him there is subjectivity on the other hand. He battled that man's going past or amazing quality is a result of confinement or restriction. Human knowldge is made out of two segments knowns as snappy intuiton and universalizing of decisions. The previous is open as it contains in a fundamental acknowledgment and the last as that human perception as not the producer of those article yet rather it just ties together the particular thought. He used Kant thought of man's impediments in the supernatural hover of figuring out how to express the pith of his guideline (points of confinement of person). Heidegger didn't surrender the cenrtal part of science in the space of philosphy. He battled that its basic part is to reveal the epitome (embodiment) of man. The job of man can't be recognized without an itemized examination of the embodiment of man in this present reality. Thusly, we have not way out yet rather to anlyse the area of the power of man. For Heidegger rationale is not any more a matter of theoritical reflection or exploratory examination yet a unique request. He asserted that science doesn't think, limits thought and sense guided reflection to the sensible, calculative assignment of western creative space and advancing of science. We should allow ourselves to end up required being alluded to that search for what no advancement can find. Hencethforth, Heidegger essential way of thinking of science is to keep the request open and that is to make the request problematical. Heidegger's analysis of philosophical way to deal with Science and innovation Inoder to know how things are, rather than how one needs them to be, science appears to depict the manner in which the world is, rather than giving perspectival and orchestrated assessment. In like manner, innovation , on the other is appreciated as essentially associated science, that is, the requesting by instrumental explanation of nature uncovered fair-mindedly by theoritical reason, undermines to compromises man into mentioning as expected the single technique for revealing and as such squares various strategies for cognizance. Current science may go before innovation by a few many years, yet it readies the way for advancement since it starting at now has the encapsulation of innovation, as it sets up data on the conviction of emotional portrayal (i.e., objectivity). Logical objectivity thusly readies the course for the exemplification of development to hold impact. That is, science and development start with a priori projection of a thought of nature, much as old (antiquated) techne began with an idea of the thing to be made. Current science considers material science(physics) as things, that is spatiotemporally (identifying with reality) loosened up bodies subject to an understandability of forces quantifiable early. In both science and innovation, man is tossed against the huge excesss>GET ANSWER