1. What is the perceived violation of First-Amendment rights? Consider the legal definition [“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”] instead of the often erroneous understanding of the First Amendment cited in informal banter or across the web.
  2. Using research and critical reasoning, determine whether or not this issue is valid. Has there indeed been a violation of First-Amendment rights? If so, then what aspect of the law has been violated?
  3. Propose a logical course of action that would adhere to the freedoms permitted by the First Amendment: is there a solution or compromise that would benefit both sides of the argument? What angles might others have failed to consider in deliberating on this specific controversy? Does this solution uphold everyone’s First-Amendment rights?

Sample Solution

This question has been answered.

Get Answer