a. Discuss the ethical issues related to resource allocation and technology.
b. What impact does this knowledge have on the community health nurse caring for vulnerable populations?
c. Discuss two strategies to narrow the technology gap to provide current health information to the vulnerable populations
Humanity never had a general public that did not have a pioneer or a main gathering. Pioneers were offered capacity to choose the destiny of their nations or associations. From the beginning of time, researchers and students of history lauded extraordinary pioneers, and cruelly censured awkward ones. Incredible pioneers carried their country to thriving and request, while inept pioneers drove the country to ruins and caused their kin to endure and bite the dust. All pioneers, in the long run, achieved a purpose; "I will make my nation prosperous." There were numerous extraordinary masterminds who brought up what the characteristics of a decent pioneer who can acquire flourishing and request the general public, and some of them repudiated each other in the most radical manner. In any case, characteristics of an incredible/successful pioneer are moxy that can control individuals' brain at one's will, mental solidness that can control one's very own feelings, capacity to draw out the best from the apparently most unhelpful assets, keen expertise that can distinguish reality, and splendor of both personality and body with important brutality and insidiousness. At the end of the day, the best head ought to be almost impeccable or uncaring sooner or later. Control of the human personality is, I accept, the most significant nature of a powerful pioneer. The meaning of control is equivalent to control. In any case, who truly needs to be controlled when they have their very own unrestrained choice? That is the reason, a control of an incredible pioneer is control without limitation, yet control with unrestrained choice. As a pioneer, one should always check whether his gathering of individuals are under his impact. Obviously, more often than not, position gives an individual gigantic impact over the general population of the gathering, similar to the pope or a military head. The pope, the pioneer of the Roman Catholic Church, had an incredible impact over the solid backers of Catholicism until the finish of Renaissance Europe. Military pioneers, then again, are fit for beginning an uprising independent from anyone else. One general guideline that applies in the military is straightforward: pursue undeniably. This gives them the expert to control individuals with no troubles, however we don't call them viable pioneers in light of the fact that their impact can make considerable harm the general public. The control of a powerful pioneer isn't constrained, yet deliberate. The instance of the popes is constrained in light of the fact that the backers' religion expects them to help the pope when in the midst of hardship, and moreover, if a few supporters don't coordinate, this gathering of "non-religious" individuals will be separated from the network of pioneers and lose what impact they had. Consequently, it isn't altogether willful however for the most part constrained. A compelling pioneer can cause individuals to do what the person needs them to manage without instructing them to do as such on the grounds that the enthusiasm of the general population untruth parallel with that of the pioneer. A powerful pioneer's kin do what they feel fundamental for them to do, without realizing that the pioneer liked them to move in as such, much the same as how Lao tzu portrayed a decent pioneer. A reasonable precedent is Emperor Taizong of Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin. As indicated by the Record of the Great student of history, otherwise called Shiji(å²è¨˜), by Sima Qian, in spite of the fact that Li Shimin picked up his honored position through an unethical mean, he later made his country prosperous that notwithstanding when a profitable property fell on the ground, nobody tried to lift them up imagining that somebody may have lost it in unknowingly. Additionally, when there were disasters that overflowed an entire city, individuals, without taking requests from anybody, went out to help in the modifying procedure. This was in actuality the very thing that Li Shimin needed to witness and his prevalence has enabled him to control individuals without questioning that it will cause them ruin. Some may inquire as to why control is the key component for a powerful pioneer. Would it not resemble playing god? Is it not that equivalent to controlling individuals with cajoling, or baiting youngsters with confections? In reality, it may look like playing god, however intensity of god is path past the capacities of people. The god in this setting isn't really god from the book of scriptures, however an otherworldly being with huge forces to make, control, and devastate humanity. One of his forces can be depicted as imperceptible string that treats people like manikins, while controls done by a pioneer resembles an agreement that empowers each other to act, yet for an extremely significant lot of time. God's capacity makes men work like his manikin, a doll that can be controlled with his imperceptible hand, broken, and overlooked. On the off chance that an individual An is viewed as controllable, delicate, and forgettable by someone else B, at that point it implies that this individual An isn't an equivalent of individual B, however individual A turns into a second rate of individual B. There are no man that can do such thing for they neither have the ability to totally control someone else's psyche nor have the brutality to treat everybody, including their family, as lesser than themselves. That is the confinement of individuals contrasted with the capacity of a divine being. Presently, if this isn't authentic in any way, it appears drawing youngsters with desserts. To this announcement, I should ask; does it truly? Is it a give and take process? In the event that control was surely a give and take process, that would expect one to lose a thing and increase something different. In correlation with the given thought, the pioneer must offer something to the general population and acquire something, and the general population should pick up something and lose something. In this manipulative procedure, no side loses anything in light of the fact that the idea of agony of losing an ownership is non-existent for this situation. Normally, a reality that all human can concede to is the accompanying articulation, "on the off chance that one loses his or her ownership, the individual feels torment for the misfortune". In rationale, when one explanation, "In the event that P, at that point Q" is valid, at that point its reversal, "On the off chance that not P, at that point not Q", of its transformation, "On the off chance that not Q, at that point not P", turns out to be valid, which is likewise called a contraposition. Considering the past articulation genuine, rationale expresses that its contraposition, "in the event that one doesn't feel torment for misfortune, one didn't lose anything", turns out to be valid. Along these lines, neither one of the sides lost anything to one another. Think about how two darlings give each other endowments and supports. On the off chance that one side needs something, another will happily give it knowing very well that the provider won't profit a great deal. There is no torment of losing an ownership in this circumstance, and moreover, the supplier won't state he has lost anything. Keen ability is a follow up of control of individuals. Discerning aptitude alludes to a capacity to see reality and to comprehend an issue, article, and other individuals with extraordinary ability. Individuals with this ability are likely move nearer to the quintessence of the issue. A pioneer needs this on the grounds that the capacity to recognize the embodiment of the issue will in all probability give a pioneer an excellent position to begin the activity. In the event that the issue is obscure, there can be no arrangement by any stretch of the imagination. Moreover, if the issue is misconstrued, it is very likely that one will never achieve most suitable response to the issue. The instance of Edward 'Blackbeard' Teach can demonstrate that keen ability is one of the nature of a decent pioneer. He comprehended that telling an armada required a man with something beyond animal power. The issue was the means by which to get a solid hold on the intrigue and confidence of his teams and commanders. He, notwithstanding being a privateer, was understandable enough to get the consideration of his group by following their conclusions. On the off chance that their feelings appeared to be reasonable enough, he thought about them. Likewise, he had a scary body fabricate and face; and he didn't slaughter or exact damage on his prisoners, yet developed a feeling of dread in them, making the story to be misrepresented and abstain from battling however much as could reasonably be expected, and loot absent really any battling. Notwithstanding during his battle, he constantly connected moderate consuming exhaust to his hair and facial hair to give his foes and groups a devilish picture. This privateer head made progress for the most part from his capacity to see the issue with the ordering a gathering of individuals. His comprehension of the working of human personality made him an embodiment of privateers during his period. Another significant nature of a viable pioneer is mental soundness in any circumstance, which means regardless of whether somebody was fiercely killed before that person, the individual in question can keep up his unmistakable feeling of the real world and give balanced choices for the issue. There is a precept in Korea which says, "Regardless of whether one is in a tiger's jaw, get the mind right, one can endure". This implies in spite of any condition, on the off chance that one can stay rational, the individual in question can beat those conditions. Along these lines, control of feeling is critical. For example, if a pioneer happens to go over an occurrence where his kin have disturbed him, he will shape some sort of resentment upon those individuals despite the fact that he realizes that he ought not. The resentment will continue collecting over the long haul, and pioneer will in the end discharge it with his allowed power. This could be obliterating for the nation. A precedent wherein a pioneer bombed by no control of feeling is Yeonsangun of Joseon Dynasty. As indicated by the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty , this ruler had no persistence at all, and at whatever point he was furious, he would execute his subjects decisively. This prompted the dissatisfaction of the residents and different authorities, both degenerate and noble. The outcome was an uprising that had harmed the nation for a significant lot of time. Uncontrolled feeling drives everybody, including the pioneer himself, to destroy. Control of feeling, or keeping up the soundness of one's brain is significant. Another significant part of being a pioneer is his capacity to settle on choices that will bring the best result out of any conditions. Envision a stock specialist who is responsible for appropriating his customers' cash to purchase the stocks to carry them more cash to and thusly procure remuneration. This requires a great deal of investigating and basic leadership most importantly. With a similar given assets, a slight change c>GET ANSWER