The proposed AT&T merger with T-Mobile would have not violated antitrust laws even if it poses a high possibility of monopolizing mobile services. Around 2011, AT&T was the leading provider of mobile services with T-Mobile not far behind. Combining AT&T’s 100.7 million subscribers to T-Mobile’s 33.7 million customers would create high leverage in the mobile service world. (Moritz, 2011). This would affect customers who live in rural low reception receiving areas and those who don’t earn as much income. On a technicality, the merger would not be considered a monopoly due to the definition that illegal anti-competitive acts qualify as a one. (Seaquist, 2012). However, the merger could unfavorably manipulate customer and supplier contracts activities People enjoy options and more for their money. Many would see T-Mobile as a competitor and a driving force of innovation to better sell products and plans to customers It could branch out worldwide and create greater connectivity to persons globally as well as boost market shares.
ers an incredible variety of social life, as well as diversities of ethnic, linguistic, regional, economic, religious, class, and caste groups crosscut Indian society. Often there is also a difference in gender respect between urban and rural areas. The difference between the North and the South of the country are vast, especially when it comes to marriage and kinship. When it comes to themes in the Indian society there are three things we mainly need to focus on. One being hierarchy and the other being purity and pollution. In a social aspect India is still a hierarchical society, no matter if north or south, hindu or muslim, urban or village, virtually all things, people, and social groups are ranked according to various essential qualities. This leads to certain difficulties in the society and on a political level. Although india is a democratic country there rarely is a complete equality between people, simply because of their social level. (“Asiasociety”). In India it can happen that individuals are officially ranked according to their wealth and power. This means that successful or rich people are more important or have a higher say than people who are not successful. This does not happen all the time but it certainly can. (“Asiasociety”) Now even in countries such as Germany, USA, France, UK, etc. you can tell that individuals who are very successful often have a higher input simply through lobbying or contacts. The big difference is that it is not officially accepted by society, like it is in India. Some status differences in India are expressed by their laws of purity and pollution. This includes different castes, religions, and regions around the country. In general a high status is associated with purity and a low status as polluted. Some rankings of purity are inherited as for example in the caste system. An Individual is born into a caste and cannot change it or rank up into another caste. Individuals might be born into a caste with a higher title than others in the same caste. Usually it is not permitted to marry outside of their caste, but it has been happening increasingly. Although the standard of living in India is growing steadily as well as their middle class, in March of 2019 compared to the US the cost of living in India is 65.31% lower (aggregate date for all cities, except rent)(numbe>GET ANSWER