Explore the relationship between the logical and physical system integration.

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

The relationship between the logical and physical system integration is one of mutual dependency and complementary function. They are two sides of the same coin, representing different aspects of a system’s design and implementation:

Logical System Integration:

  • Focus: Defines the system’s functionalities, data flow, and processes without considering the specific hardware or software used.

  • Abstraction Level: High-level, conceptual view of how different components interact and achieve the desired outcomes.

  • Examples: System architecture diagrams, data models, business process flows, and functional specifications.

The relationship between the logical and physical system integration is one of mutual dependency and complementary function. They are two sides of the same coin, representing different aspects of a system’s design and implementation:

Logical System Integration:

  • Focus: Defines the system’s functionalities, data flow, and processes without considering the specific hardware or software used.

  • Abstraction Level: High-level, conceptual view of how different components interact and achieve the desired outcomes.

  • Examples: System architecture diagrams, data models, business process flows, and functional specifications.

Physical System Integration:

  • Focus: Deals with the concrete implementation of the system, including the hardware, software, network infrastructure, and physical connections.

  • Abstraction Level: Low-level, detailed view of how the system is physically built and deployed.

  • Examples: Server configurations, network topologies, physical cabling diagrams, and software deployment plans.

Relationship and Dependency:

  • Logical dictates Physical: The logical system integration defines the requirements that the physical system must meet. For instance, a logical design that specifies a high-volume transaction processing system dictates the need for powerful servers and robust network infrastructure.

  • Physical enables Logical: The physical system integration provides the foundation for the logical system to function. Without the appropriate hardware, software, and connections, the logical processes and functionalities cannot be implemented.

  • Iteration and Refinement: The logical and physical systems are not static entities. They evolve together as the system is developed and deployed. Modifications to one often necessitate adjustments to the other.

Example: Imagine designing a system for an online e-commerce store.

  • Logical: The logical design would define the steps for ordering, payment processing, inventory management, and customer support.

  • Physical: The physical design would specify the servers, databases, web applications, and network connections needed to support these functionalities.

Challenges in Integration:

  • Misalignment: A mismatch between the logical and physical designs can lead to performance issues, inefficiencies, or even system failures.

  • Complexity: As systems become more complex, integrating them effectively becomes more challenging, requiring careful planning and communication between different teams.

Overall:

The relationship between the logical and physical system integration is a complex and dynamic process. Effective integration requires:

  • Clear Communication: Open communication and collaboration between design, development, and operations teams.

  • Careful Planning: Thorough planning and consideration of both logical and physical aspects.

  • Continuous Monitoring: Regular monitoring and evaluation to ensure the system meets both logical and physical requirements.

A well-integrated system, both logically and physically, ensures the efficient and reliable functioning of the system, achieving the desired outcomes while optimizing resource utilization and reducing the risk of failure.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer