The Intelligence Gathering Debate
Prepare a persuasive paper (excluding the title and reference pages).
- Examine the role of intelligence in countering terrorism in America.
- Analyze the constitutional issues (in particular the Fourth Amendment) surrounding the concept of gathering information to develop intelligence domestically.
- Explain whether the United States government may collect phone, email, and other electronic and non-electronic data from Americans, on a mass basis, without a warrant and/or probable cause.
- Support position with scholarly or official government sources from readings and research.
- Explain the role of intelligence in countering terrorism.
- Explain the constitutional limitations on gathering intelligence.
- Explain why and how gathering intelligence from Americans without a warrant or probable cause is or is not permissible.
The Intelligence Gathering Debate paper
- Must be two double-spaced pages in length (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style.
- Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph with a succinct thesis statement. The thesis must be in both the introduction and the conclusion.
- Must use at least two scholarly sources or official government sources in addition to the course text.
- Must document any information used from sources in APA style.
- Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style.
- Use sources listed below in addition to other references:
determine irrationality of a suicide if there was no way possible of the individual knowing; it can only be judged if there was no attempt to get it from reliable sources (Battin 137-138). I think that Battin is inferring that not having the correct information could mean they are unable to participate in rational thought process. Another assumption of suicide not being rational due to this criterion is caused by internal factors, such as depression where they can unknowingly suppress certain information (Brandt, cited in Battin 1995, 138). She counters this by stating that you can still have adequate information because the future may be already negative, even with a smaller view (Battin 138-139). Therefore, from her counterargument, she is countering any claims of narrow views that the opposition would try to argue by stating that an individual’s health status does not matter. Battin states that some would claim that suicide would be irrational if one committed it because of an unlikely future, but states t>GET ANSWER