Examine the social class system in the U.S. and how all aspects of our lives are impacted by our social class position.
Using Dennis Gilbert and Joseph Kahl’s model of social class, identify your family’s social class position on the social class ladder, while explaining what general factors you are using to place your family in that position, as well as noting any examples of status inconsistency. Please remember that the income levels that Gilbert and Kahl use are not accurate for California. To have a more accurate idea of the income levels of each social class group in the Bay Area we would have to just about double the numbers that provided in the textbook.
Predict (or imagine) the social class to which you see yourself belonging twenty years from now, while noting whether it is the same as or different than your family’s current social class position.
Consider several different advantages and/or disadvantages your family’s current social class position provides or poses in helping to determine the social class to which you see yourself belonging twenty years from now. Choose three of the advantages and/or disadvantages to explain in more detail for the discussion board. (You do not have to tell us all the advantages/disadvantages, only three.)
versus private annuity subsidize that relative firm esteem is emphatically identified with private annuity finance possession and contrarily identified with (lobbyist) open benefits support proprietorship. These outcomes bolstered the view that the activities of open annuity support chiefs may be spurred more by political or social impacts than by firm execution. Ashraf and Jayaman (2007)19 inspected common finances' exchanging conduct after the arrival of casting a ballot records. The examination found that subsidizes that help investor recommendations decrease possessions after the arrival of casting a ballot records. Since the season of discharging casting a ballot records could be extremely distant from the investor meeting date, shared subsidizes' exchanging conduct after the arrival of casting a ballot records might be random to the votes thrown in the gathering. Dahlquist et al. (2003)20 dissected remote proprietorship and firm attributes for the Swedish market. The examination found that outsiders have more prominent nearness in vast firms, firms paying low profits and in firms with huge money property and clarified that firm size is driven by liquidity. It repeated that outsiders keep an eye on underweight the organizations with a prevailing proprietor. Leuz, Nanda and Wysocki (2003)21 attested that the data issues cause outsiders to hold less resources in firms. Firm dimension attributes can be required to add to the data asymmetry issues. Focused family control makes it more probable that data is conveyed by means of private channels. Educational insiders have motivations to conceal the advantages from outside speculators by giving murky fiscal summaries and overseeing profit. Haw, Hu, Hwang and Wu (2004)22 found that firm dimension factors cause data asymmetry issues to FII. It discovered proof that US speculation is lower in firms where chiefs don't have successful control. Outside interest in firms that seem to lock in in more income the board is lower in nations with poor data structure. Choe, Kho, Stulz (2005)23 found that US financial specialists do undoubtedly hold less offers in firms with proprietorship structures that are progressively helpful for confiscation by controlling insiders. In organizations where insiders are ruling data access and accessibility to the investors will be restricted. With less data, outside speculators face an antagonistic choice issue. So they under put resources into such stocks. Covirg et al. (2008)24 inferred that outside reserve directors have less data about the local stocks than the residential store supervisors. They found that proprietorship by remote assets is identified with size of outside deals, list enrollments and stocks with remote posting. Leuz, Lins, and Warnock (2009)25 found that remote institutional financial specialists like to put resources into firms with "better" administration rehearses. This writing expect that firm dimension corporate administration systems substitute for feeble nation level lawful securities of minority investors. Aggarwal, Klapper and Wysocki (2005)26 found that U.S. common subsidizes will in general put more noteworthy sums in nations with more grounded investor rights and legitimate structures (controlling for the nation's financial improvement). What's more, inside the nations, the shared assets additionally separate based on administration in that they designate a greater amount of their resources for firms with better corporate administration structures. Resume In the wake of assessing the writing on the above sub-segment, it is presumed that the outcomes are uncertain with respect to the relationship between institutional possessions and corporate administration as certain investigations perpetually bolster the theory that institutional property and corporate administration are altogether related while the others dismiss it. Be that as it may, the outcomes are uniform on one issue that there is sure connection between the remote>GET ANSWER