You have fallen down a strange rabbit hole and found yourself in a bizarre alternate universe called Freetopia, where a nascent government is forming and a great debate is raging about methods of judicial selection. Federalist 78 and the Brutus essays have been recently published and people are talking!
You are a person of great prominence and eminent intellect and the people are looking to YOU to propose the best form of selecting judges. Being gainfully employed at the esteemed local newspaper, your editor, Ms. Smiles, asks you to write an article (1) responding to the above papers AND (2) coming up with the best way to select judges.
The piece should be 4 — 5 pages in length, double spaced, standard font/margin.
First, respond to the main points brought up by the Federalist and Anti-Federalist essays
Discuss WHY you agree with them (or not). Ms. Smiles takes nothing at face value so you will have to explain your positions and support your arguments.
Use at least 2 direct quotes from each side (Federalist and Anti-Federalist) – no citation needed.
Next, counter the essays with a basic judicial selection plan of your own.
Besides incorporating (or rejecting) some of the aspects discussed in the essays, you will need to add some new ideas to the mix to get the people fired up by discussing ideas such as Merit Based Selection Plans and/or direct election of judges.

Sample Solution

This question has been answered.

Get Answer