The culminating assessment for the Synthesis of Educational Theory domain is a research paper that identifies a problem in education, clarifies relevant ways to address the problem, and explores different perspectives regarding the future of education.
A. Provide an introduction in which you do the following:
1. Identify an open-ended problem in education.
a. Explain your current thinking about the future of education posed by the open-ended problem you have identified, supporting your explanation with research-based evidence.
B. Choose five aspects that influence your open-ended problem, which can include but are not limited to the following:
• teachers and standards
• high-stakes assessments
• special education
• public policy
• diversity and inclusion
1. Identify two possible approaches and discuss how they address the open-ended problem, using each of the 5 aspects chosen in part B.
a. Provide evidence to support your discussion from part B1.
i. Discuss the quality of evidence, including the credibility and bias of the provided information or evidence relevant to the possible approaches presented in part B1.
b. Discuss the underlying assumptions of the possible approaches presented in part B1.
2. Discuss how two of the influencing aspects chosen in part B and the possible approaches from part B1 impact each other.
3. Analyze the pros and cons of implementing each of the possible approaches from part B1.
4. Propose your solution to the open-ended problem identified in part A1.
a. Discuss potential criticisms of the solution you proposed in part B4 and ways of addressing those criticisms.
5. Reflect on what education would look like in the future if the solution from part B4 were implemented.
Aristotle Education and Plato Through the duration of Aristotle, one would think about how a simple idea of rationality could affect the way instruction is rehearsed today as we probably am aware it. Aristotle's lifestyle mirrored the way he thought and what he composed for individuals to see and instruct upon today. He has numerous methods of insight that are carried directly into the classroom today without anybody knowing they are. His methods of insight are genuinely noteworthy. At the point when a man makes something or shows something, the methods of insight acquired the classroom turn out to be innate to the point that individuals who utilize it don't know it exists. Authenticity is an instructive reasoning, which stresses learning that creates from one's own particular detects. Under this reasoning the thought exists that there is a genuine not developed by human personalities, that can be known by one's own psyche. It is through encountering the world around everybody in which one takes in the directing standards and social lead of life. The truth is the thing that one encounters in the physical world. Along these lines, all that one can take in and know originates from encountering our general surroundings. Aristotle is considered by most to be one of the best agnostic thinkers. He was conceived in a Grecian province at Stagira, 384 B.C.E. During childbirth he was naturally introduced to a set life. His dad, Nicomachus, had a situation under the King Amyntas of Macedonia as court doctor. Subsequently, this could identify with how his instruction began off. It was felt that his predecessors held a similar position under the King since along these lines the zone of court doctor could end up genetic. As doctor, Aristotle was educated in the territory of medications and was likewise prepared for the situation of court doctor. It was here that he was plainly taught with a creating brain to engage the numerous inquiries that emerged in his mind and the course he would take to answer them. It is additionally evident that with each time Aristotle set out starting with one place then onto the next, it had a type of effect on him: his reasoning, his works, and how rationality is seen today. With each place he ventured out to, he could pick up, offer, educate, and encounter the learning of reasoning. It was from when he was eighteen till he was around thirty-seven that he considered under the direction of Plato as his student in Athens. He was held as a recognized understudy among the gathering that concentrated with him in the Grove of Academus. The main issue that appeared to emerge in his times of study was his connection with his instructor. Presently these occasions are not clear but rather it is realized that both Aristotle and Plato had each their own particular thoughts regarding certain perspectives and rationalities. Along these lines, it is nature for them to knock heads a little in contentions about whether either side was reasonable with their thoughts, convictions, and additionally sees. There was still no motivation to trust that the two did not have any shape a fellowship, since they both had such high perspectives toward life. Legend reflected ineffectively and horribly upon Aristotle yet legend has not been seen that route as it is today. However, it was demonstrated even after Plato's passing in 347 B.C.E. that Aristotle still held Plato in high regards. He never gave any absence of friendly gratefulness to him, when all individuals anticipated that him would do once he kicked the bucket. The demise of somebody critical in his life most likely additionally influenced the way he considered certain thoughts. After his instructor's demise, Aristotle went to Atarneus in Asia Minor where he met with the ruler, Hermias. There he would be hitched to Hermias' received little girl Pythias. This may not appear to be important to how it affected authenticity in instruction, yet in the event that one were to consider it, in what capacity would marriage be able to not change the way somebody supposes in a type of way? A couple of years passed, Hermias was killed because of insubordination and King Philip II of Macedon called upon Aristotle to come back to Stagira. It was here that he would turn into the coach of Alexander the Great, who was just thirteen years of age. This greatly affected history, as individuals know it. Aristotle showed him the learning of morals and governmental issues, and in addition numerous insider facts of reasoning in which numerous individuals presumably would experience difficulty fathoming. Alexander the Great benefitted from the learning passed on from Aristotle alongside Aristotle impacting the brain of the youthful ruler to his profit, and that is the manner by which history was influenced by this contact between these two individuals. When Alexander took the position of royalty, Aristotle came back to Athens and there opened a school of reasoning. Later he followed in the strides of his instructor, Plato. He framed a school, Lyceum, in a recreation center, where he gave normal direction in reasoning. It was here that for a long time (335-322B.C.E.) as an instructor at the Lyceum, he thought of the more noteworthy number of his compositions. He concocted "exchanges", which were works that Aristotle as often as possible composed that are still perused today and were then by his understudies. When educating at the Lyceum, Aristotle had a propensity for strolling about as he instructed. It was regarding this that his devotees wound up referred to in later years as the peripatetics, signifying, "to stroll about." Besides, he made the few treatises on material science, mysticism, et cetera, in which the piece is a dialect more specialized than in the "discoursed". These compositions indicate the amount of an awesome impact they have, for example, the way they affected Alexander whom later wound up known as Alexander the Great. They appear specifically how he prevailing with regards to uniting crafted by his antecedents in Greek theory, and how he saved neither agonies nor cost in seeking after, either by and by or through others, his examinations in the domain of regular Phenomena. At the point when Alexander's passing wound up known at Athens, and the episode happened which prompted the Lamian war; Aristotle was obliged to partake in the general disagreeability of the Macedonians. The charge of offensiveness, which had been brought against Anaxagoras and Socrates, was currently, with even less reason, brought against him. He exited the city, saying (as indicated by numerous antiquated specialists) that he would not allow the Athenians to sin a third time against Philosophy. He took up his habitation at his nation house, at Chalcis, in Euboea, and there he kicked the bucket the next year, 322B.C.E. His passing was because of an illness from which he had since quite a while ago endured. The story that his demise was because of hemlock harming, and also the legend, saying they he dedicated himself completely to the ocean are totally without verifiable establishment. There are various ways that the hypotheses, methods of insight, morals, compositions, and styles of instructing of Aristotle have affected training today and probably will keep on later on. Aristotle accepted emphatically in the significance of a training that reviews this present reality and afterward makes determinations and additions information through systematic activities. With for all intents and purposes everything that is done today and showed today, there is some pertinent connection to that of Aristotle and his convictions. Through some of Aristotle's books of Politics, one can perceive how instruction could be impacted and influenced by what Aristotle says in his works. Aristotle's moral hypothesis is communicated through numerous viewpoints. Aristotle tends to express his inclination towards goodness in a way where it can go two ways. He discusses how ideals is isolated into good and scholarly temperance. Magnificence of character manages the "great life" and joy. Individuals are worried about their character and getting the brilliant mean, which is genuine satisfaction, throughout everyday life. One whom teaches would be influenced by this brilliant mean since they should figure out how to stray far from this perspective. They need to figure out how to instruct for the sole motivation behind the individuals who are being educated to flourish concerning what they are being instructed. As it were, all these are interrelated with each other. Aristotle likewise clarifies the connection amongst morals and legislative issues, which prompts the suggestion for nature of profound quality and well living. Goodness, to Aristotle, is deciphered as the greatness of a question and that the protest will play out it's capacity viably. This goes for individuals also. For instance an "idealistic" instructor will effectively educate their understudies data they have to grasp keeping in mind the end goal to go ahead with their training. Aristotle isolates human righteousness into two sorts. One is moral goodness and the other is scholarly ideals. In spite of the fact that, it is difficult to give a correct meaning of each kind, one would trust that a teacher of today would lean toward the more good righteous side. Excellence is likewise a condition of character that is worried about decision with the brilliant mean. This prompts talking about the mean as per Aristotle. Individuals who are ethically upright are continually settling on their choices as indicated by the brilliant mean. Obviously not every person is the same, distinctive individuals have diverse means. This realizes the point that the great life is an existence of bliss. Aristotle says such an existence can be accomplished by perfection in the two territories of ideals, however individuals are altogether going for some kind of good throughout everyday life. Some equitable may have higher desires in their objective. Individuals with virtual perfection need to have the great life that, as per them, is the greatness of character. The great life is alluded to as being content with life. Satisfaction must have two ideas included to fit Aristotle's definition. Somebody must exercise his or her idea of reason. He calls this "movement of soul." Happiness likewise should have quality in the execution of the uprightness, and it is the central objective that everybody wishes to achieve. Aristotle contended that the objective of individuals is bliss, and that we accomplish joy when we satisfy our capacity, or motivation behind life. In this way, it is important to figure out what our capacity is. The capacity of a thing is the thing that it can alone do, or what it can do best. This here is a key point in which a teacher must get it. This key purpose of comprehension is a standout amongst the most influen>GET ANSWER