Instructions from teacher… Please only do only around 800 words im not sure how far this will get you in assignment.. I will pay for more just let me know
Use computer timeline software https://www.tiki-toki.com/account/
1. Visual interest score depends on whether you do the following:
a. Change from white font on black background: Go to Settings > Advanced Settings > Lightbox Customization and use the pull-down menu to change from “Standard black” to “White with colored borders.” My eyes thank you!
b. Add a background image, or at least add color to the black void!
c. Use colors to distinguish the categories you create (#4 below).
2. References–In your Tiki-Toki timeline, move the mouse over the upper right-hand corner. Some words will show up (barely). Click on “About This Timeline.” In addition to your name and a title, you must also put your References list there. My name IS Verlie Doing you can use title History of Psychology ?
a. APA style is required. The list of your textbooks, which will be your primary source of info, should be just like they appear in the Syllabus (except for “paperback:” of course). Note that in APA style, the list is called References, not Bibliography or Works Cited.
b. In each entry (called a “story” in Tiki-Toki) you should cite your source as you would in the text of a term paper, for example (Benjamin, 2014) or (Guthrie, 2004). Any citation should refer back to a source listed in your References.
c. If you quote directly, you must “use quotation marks” and cite the page number or subheading of a webpage, like this: (Karwoski, 2014, p. 949). A citation is what you put in your entry/story to tell me where you got the info, most of which will be from our textbooks.
a. The purpose of assigning Contributors to categories is to put some order in your collection of people that will aid in understanding the development of Psychology as a discipline.
b. In semesters past, this has been the most difficult part of the Timeline, so I will provide them. USE THESE CATEGORIES (If you are unsure of where someone fits best, post to the Timeline DB):
i. Philosophy (including “moral philosophy” before Psychology became a discipline)
ii. Physiology (incl. neuroscience)
iv. Non-scientific psychology (incl. mesmerism, phrenology, physiognomy, etc.)
v. Physical Anthropology (helpful for early chapters of Guthrie)
vi. Prejudice and social issues (incl. eugenics and minority pioneers)
vii. Cognitive (incl. early research in perception, learning, and memory)
viii. Pre-functionalism (for example, James and Hall)
xiii. Applied (incl. psychological professions: clinical, school, advertising, etc.)
xiv. Context (see below)
a. You also need a category highlighting the Context in which psychology developed. Entries in this category should span most of your Timeline, not just be all bunched up within a few years. They should not be about psychology, but deal with what was happening in other aspects of life at the same time. It can be fashion, attitudes toward women or minorities, popular music of the day, international conflicts, social movements, history of pop music or organized crime…you name it! Make it international when possible. These entries are not to be taken from the textbooks! Include a minimum of 6 entries in this category.
b. Please use a different color for each category and make sure the labels are readable in the Standard view type.
5. Key Contributors from BOTH textbooks, Benjamin and Guthrie. In Guthrie, bear in mind that not all “Contributions” were positive, but are still a part of psychology’s history. Later chapters feature lesser known Contributors (not mentioned in Benjamin) who deserve entries in your Timeline.
a. Excellent = more than 50 Contributors (Your entries for context, psychological events, etc., will be in addition to 50+ entries for individuals)
b. Who to include? People who made notable contributions (the Timeline is a means of taking notes on the main characters described in our textbooks).
6. Key Contributions
a. Usually 3 or more things the texts report as contributions he or she made
b. Birth and death dates (you may have to research them, but no reference need be cited)
c. Various facts about them and their careers
d. Do not consult outside sources, such as online enclyclopedias, but focus on what the textbooks tell you. You can consult other History of Psych textbooks or assigned articles, but refence and cite them.
e. Rather than sentences in paragraphs, use a list format, such as bullet points. The Tiki-Toki story section “Extra Information” will allow you to do that.
7. Photo Credits
a. Use Wikipedia as your source of portraits of Contributors; they are almost always copyright free. You do not need an image for EVERY entry.
b. Credit the page where you saw the photo (URL) either at the end of the text for each person or in the ‘Caption’ of the portrait (shortened if need be—do not obscure the photo). This will be different from what you enter in the Source line for Tiki-Toki.
c. Your photo credit should NOT be a URL that ends in .png, .jpg, .gif, etc. because I want the link to the page where you found the photo, not just the photo itself.
1. Benjamin, L. T., Jr. (2014). A brief history of modern psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
2. Guthrie, R. V. (2004). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn &
For other material mentioned in instructions to access course go to
then click on PSY 308 1001 – 2018 Sumr then “ Learning Modules” and you will find all material
What are the proposals for a firm that does not lead CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is routinely stirred up for a 21st century in vogue articulation when actually it has been a bit of the business vocabulary for an extensive time allotment. While some fight that the thought backpedals to the Industrial Revolution, the primary substantive work was formed by Peter Drucker in his 1954 book The Practice of Management. Disregarding the movement of time, there is still no across the board significance of CSR. Corporate Social Responsibility, what it is and how it is executed, is differing depending on the country a business works inside, the regulatory structure they are at risk to and even the business inside which they work. These entrapments aside, it is vital to settle on adjusted significance of CSR remembering the ultimate objective to fundamentally discuss the thought in this paper. The definition offered by the International Organization for Standardization will be used, as it is general in nature and appropriate to most associations, regardless their country of movement: "Social commitment is the obligation of a relationship for the impacts of its decisions and activities on society and nature, through direct and good lead that: adds to sensible headway, including the prosperity and the welfare of society thinks about the wants of accomplices is in consistence with appropriate law and unsurprising with widespread benchmarks of lead; and Is composed all through the affiliation and practiced in its associations." (International Organization for Standardization, 2010) They one inadequacy in this definition is the suggestion that CSR is about consistence with pertinent law. In Dahlsrud's (2008) examination of 37 CSR definitions, he recognized five fundamental estimations. The chief estimation is the earth and its idea in business assignments and the second is the social estimation which covers associations thinking about their impact on society. Both of these estimations are essential to our working definition. The third estimation recognized is the money related estimation which looks for a guarantee to joining CSR into business undertakings is also present like the fourth estimation which related to how associations should manage all accomplice clusters in a socially tried and true way (Dahlsrud, 2008). The last estimation, purposefulness, is what is truant from the ISO definition. Dahlsrud (2008) portrays deliberateness as associations settling on decisions and undertaking practices that are above what is legitimately required while the ISO definition (International Organization for Standardization, 2010) states that minor consistence is attractive. It is battled that simply complying with the law is better depicted as extraordinary corporate organization and not of itself an exhibit of corporate social obligation (Ashley and Crowther, 2012; Bênabou and Tirole, 2010). Indispensable to the CSR chitchat about is the prospect of how society portrays the piece of business, and the resulting obligations. The praiseworthy parts and obligations consigned to business are to equip capital and distinctive resources in progress, to give work and vital occupations, to lead research, headway and improvement, to give items and ventures to bargain, to make wealth for speculators, agents, customers and society free to move around at will. (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011) These inside, advancement and advantage enlivened commitments do address a couple of estimations of CSR, yet standing out these from the obligations provided by CSR shows the measure of advance vital to move towards a socially skilled arrangement of activity. One exceptional of the CSR go head to head with respect to, routinely suggested as the neo-set up or ordinary conflict approach (Redman, 2005), fights that the fundamental social commitment of business is to assemble benefits (Friedman, 1970). The contrary end of the range is the thing that Redman articulations the "certifiable enthusiasts" (2005, 78) approach to manage CSR. This is the place a firm has natural and social obligations set up that are not profit impelled. Regardless, bona fide corporate unselfishness is extraordinary with demonstrate recommending that affiliations will presumably get a 'lit up self-interest' approach to manage CSR (Porter and Kramer, 2006). This is an approach that ties socially careful activities to profit making works out (Redman, 2005). Lit up self-interest has been one of the primary driving forces behind corporate obligation in association with nature and utilization of frenzy resources. Commitments to creation, from rough things to oil subsidiaries, are getting the opportunity to be caution and associations have anticipated that would change in accordance with these movements or peril destruction (Ashley and Crowther, 2012). So while natural impacts are right now of more vital stress to business, it could be fought this is more the survival of the business than an intentionally socially tried and true endeavor (Ashley and Crowther, 2012). Meanwhile, society now holds more conspicuous wants of the business gathering (Scherer and Palazzo, 2011). With more raised measures of preparing (for the most part) and as needs be learning, there is to a lesser degree a slant to confide in the discussion of business. Ashley and Crowther battle that customers are not hunting down perfection of business practices, but instead "the do expect reliability and straightforwardness" (2012, pg.3). The rising and rising of internet organizing has moreover made a brisk and general means for people to reprimand associations for (saw) socially untrustworthy acts (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011). The media in like manner can give base and expansive extension on associations who have possessed with flawed practices (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011). Associations who use third world (frequently slave) work are being named and disrespected, and constrained to reassess their creation arrange practices (Ashley and Crowther, 2012). Notwithstanding these advances, the latest decade has seen representations where self-heading and careful corporate direct have shelled fabulously (Lynch-Wood et al, 2009), causing such events as the Global Financial Crisis. Hardly any, parts of society remain unaffected by these events. The response by approach makers and overseers has been snappy and restorative. The net result being more conspicuous consistence and uncovering necessities transversely finished most affiliations and ventures. By and by there exists little capability between what may have been seen as a CSR affiliation and one that practices extraordinary corporate organization (Money and Scheper, 2007; Mason and Simmonds, 2014). It is contemptible to deny that the CSR advancement has not decidedly influenced the business gathering. Regardless, the stunning measure of progress in socially careful action has been begun by the utilization of ordinary resources and the necessity for associations to upgrade undertakings, changes in people in general field and societal wants of business and government definitive response to corporate failings. Being socially careful is right now essentially extraordinary business, a fundamental fragment of operational and crucial fundamental authority (Porter and Kramer, 2006). Whichever way it is has been expert, there are comes about that still exist for affiliation that don't immediate CSR. Both the acknowledgment and reality of association execution can be overhauled by getting CSR. A couple of educated people fight the outcome is whole deal, others battle that there is no outcome by any methods (McWilliams et al, 2006). Above efficiency, there are different risks affiliations stand up to in case they don't participate in CSR lead. It should be seen that the going with isn't an exhaustive rundown, simply the ones with the best potential impact. >GET ANSWER