AMENDED, A Podcast from Humanities New York
Term Paper Essay Writing Assignment, based on podcast (see link below) you may ***choose*** ONE of the six episodes to write about please focus on that single specific episode and use writing rubric to guide your writing. Discuss all nuances.
All responses must be typed and (1500 words minimum) APA Format, must be uploaded to Blackboard.
Answer the basic questions to aid your writing:
Who
What
Where
Why
How
Significance (so what is important)
Audience (who cares, who benefits)
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Title: Unmasking the Power of Myths and Sentiments: A Critical Analysis of the “Amended” Podcast Episode
Introduction
The “Amended” podcast series, produced by Humanities New York, explores the fascinating history and impact of the United States Constitution’s amendments. In Episode 1, “Myths and Sentiments,” the host delves into the myths that surround the creation of the Constitution and how these myths have shaped public sentiment. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of Episode 1, focusing on the key points discussed, the significance of these points, and the audience that can benefit from this thought-provoking episode.
Who
The podcast episode features various experts in American history and constitutional studies, including scholars, historians, and legal professionals. Their insights shed light on the myths surrounding the Constitution’s creation and the collective sentiments attached to it.
What
The episode critically examines the myths associated with the drafting of the United States Constitution. It challenges widely held beliefs, such as the idea that the Founding Fathers were a unified group with a single vision for the nation. The episode explores how these myths have shaped public sentiment, perpetuating an idealized view of the Constitution’s creation and hindering a deeper understanding of its complexities.
Where
The discussion takes place within the context of the United States, focusing on the historical period leading up to the drafting and ratification of the Constitution. The episode references key events and figures from this time, such as the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia and prominent Founding Fathers like George Washington and James Madison.
Why
The episode aims to debunk myths surrounding the Constitution’s creation to promote a more nuanced understanding among listeners. By challenging prevailing narratives, it encourages critical thinking and encourages individuals to question commonly held beliefs. The ultimate goal is to foster a more informed and engaged citizenry that can actively participate in shaping the nation’s future.
How
The episode employs a combination of storytelling, interviews, and expert analysis to explore the myths and sentiments surrounding the Constitution. Through engaging narratives, listeners are drawn into key moments in history, while expert insights provide a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in crafting this foundational document.
Significance
The significance of Episode 1 lies in its ability to challenge long-standing assumptions about the Constitution’s creation. By unmasking these myths, the episode invites listeners to critically evaluate their own understanding of American history and constitutional principles. It highlights that historical narratives are often shaped by sentiment rather than objective truth, emphasizing the importance of approaching history with a critical lens.
Additionally, by debunking myths and exposing their influence on public sentiment, the episode encourages listeners to question popular narratives that may hinder progress or perpetuate inequalities. It underscores the importance of grappling with uncomfortable truths to foster a more inclusive and just society.
Audience
The audience that can benefit from this episode includes both individuals with a general interest in American history and constitutional studies as well as those seeking a deeper understanding of how historical narratives shape public sentiment. Students studying American history, political science, law, or related disciplines can gain valuable insights from this episode to inform their studies.
Moreover, citizens interested in participating in civic discourse or advocating for change can greatly benefit from Episode 1. By critically examining the myths surrounding the Constitution’s creation, they can contribute to informed discussions on constitutional issues and challenge prevailing narratives that may impede progress.
Conclusion
Episode 1 of “Amended,” titled “Myths and Sentiments,” offers a thought-provoking analysis of the myths surrounding the creation of the United States Constitution. Through engaging storytelling and expert analysis, it challenges widely held beliefs, unmasking the power of these myths in shaping public sentiment. The significance of this episode lies in its ability to foster critical thinking, encourage a nuanced understanding of history, and promote more inclusive civic discourse. By engaging a diverse audience interested in American history and constitutional matters, Episode 1 serves as a catalyst for deeper reflection on our nation’s past and its implications for our present and future.
