The nurses on your unit have been discussing and debating the best ways to provide care for patients when they are discharged from your unit. You are wondering how to achieve the best standard of practice for patient education in your specialty area, so you decide to formulate a PICO question and conduct a literature search on this topic.
Submit a paper of 2–3 pages in APA format that addresses the following items:
Develop a clinical question for study using the PICO format.
P: a population or a group of patients, for example patients with insulin dependent diabetes
I: an intervention, such as patient education programs
C: a comparison intervention or treatment, such as home visits by a nurse
O: patient outcomes
For example: Do educational programs for diabetics on insulin or home visits to a diabetic do more to support control of blood sugar?
For example: Do patient educational classes for asthmatic patients lead to improved functional status (decrease hospitalizations)? (Note: In this example, there is no comparison treatment.)
Using MEDLINE/PubMed (using MeSH) and CINAHL do the following:
Conduct a systematic search for relevant research findings on your topic or question.
List the words that you entered to perform each search.
List the number of findings that were returned.
Identify the steps that you took to narrow the search to more precise findings.
Describe at least 3 sources of relevant literature findings on your PICO question.
You should be able to locate the article in full text or an abstract of the study.
Select research findings that most closely fit the PICO question that you posed
Cite the references.
Now, research your PICO question using this scholarly search engine.
List the number of “hits” that were returned.
How does this search engine rate and rank the reference articles that it lists in a search?
How does this search engine ranking system aid researchers as they seek information?
Explain the following:
What steps can a researcher use to narrow the search for information on a clinical topic?
Why is it necessary to narrow a search?
Which search did you find to be the most effective and useful on this clinical topic, and what made it effective for you?
What is the difference between a search engine and a database for locating relevant practice information?
Select a preferred search tool, and identify the rationale for your preference.
instance, Sharon Begley, an surroundings professional is of the idea that Lomborg’s argument is based totally on terrible good judgment especially via Lomborg’s argument that people need to not to worry international warming due to the fact there's excessive range of deaths attributable to the ‘bloodless’ climate in place of demise due to the ‘heat’ climate. Begley is proper in his refutation of Lomborg’s argument due to the fact which means that no matter the fact that the dying toll from the nice and cozy weather is barely less in contrast with cold weather, and then this nevertheless remains a trouble that calls for a disagreement with a purpose to reduce deaths from the global warming (Anthony and Maynard, p.1802). As such Begley referred to that, “in line with a 2006 look at, 850,000 deaths from bloodless can be averted in a warmer international, no longer the 1.4 million, as Lomborg says.” This makes it an powerful method in raising a controversy specially towards severity of global warming and scientists must make an exploration of all feasible manner in preventing this international trouble. every other response to Lomborg’s discussion is that he deals with the difficulty of global warming from an economic point of view (Cho, Martens, Kim & Rodrigue, 2011). this is because lives of human beings have to be seen as being tons worthier in evaluation with some thing fee is wanted in particular to in combating international is warming. on this regard, the problem of global warming “is approached as an economist could method it, asking whether or not the blessings of intervention could exceed the costs.” that is illustrated from his try and persuade target market with a cost-benefit argument regarding worldwide warming. for instance, Lomborg cites William Nordhaus, a 9aaf3f374c58e8c9dcdd1ebf10256fa5 economist in his defense that “the fee of imposing Kyoto could exceed the whole projected value of global warming” therefore this isn't a sound argument in handling global warming specifically from an economic point of view due to the fact it's miles a matter of existence and dying troubles. Liss (2012) claims that one manner of refuting Lomborg’s argument is if international warming trouble had no longer been serious the manner Lomborg assumed, issues of many nations as well as environmental groups might no longer had been raised mainly via the assembly in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and in Kyoto in 1997 to assess person countries’ efforts in minimizing greenhouse fuel emissions. these assembly concerned research carried out by means of distinctly legit scientists as well as expert professionals that brought about a end that international warming is a an environmental hassle resulting from greenhouse fuel emissions. The findings of the meetings enumerated the ice melting as well as depletion of sea beaches as some of the critical results of worldwide warming. thus, McNeill offers a extra affordable account than that given through Lomborg due to the fact the former respects and trusts clinical information and predictions due to his complete self belief in the technological gear in addition to computer software program that are used in predicting sick effects of the global warming. therefore, international warming nevertheless stays an environmental trouble that needs disagreement appropriately.>GET ANSWER