Answer the following questions after you read the entire research article:
- Who is/are the author(s)? What credentials do they have listed if any?
- What is the title of the study?
- What journal is this article get published?
- When was it published? Is it current enough (it is current if it is published within past 5 years)?
- What research design is this study? i.e epidemiological, case study, animal study, clinical trial etc. Refer to
your text Figure 1-5 to read upon more on more if needed. Research type usually can be found under
“methodology” section within the research article.
- How many subjects involved in the study? Is the study large enough that we should pay a closer attention to
- Why do you think they conducted the study?
- Any conflict of interest statement released in the article or any potential conflict of interest that you see?
- Summarize what you learned from reading this article. Limit your answers to 50-100 words for this question.
- How the information you read might be helpful to you or someone else you know? Limit your answers to
50-100 words for this question.
PART 2 OF THE ASSIGNMENT
Go online to search an original peer-reviewed scientific journal article that is similar to the one you chose to
review (one of the four articles above listed) in Part 1 of this assignment.
For example: If you read “Long-Term Effects of 4 Popular Diets on Weight Loss and Cardiovascular Risk
Factors”. When you are ready to search a similar article, use key words such as diets, weight loss,
Write up a summary after you read the second article. Complete the following items in your summary:
Compare the two articles, discuss 2 things in common between the articles and 2 things that are different from
each other. ( 10 points)
Describe how you found/search the article for this assignment. (5 points)
Explain the experience and value of doing this assignment. How this experience might help you? (15 points)
work with goslings. Lorenz believed that A breakdown in the relationship with its mother led to a disruption in the development of a bird’s normal social behaviour, supporting his theory that the first relationship a bird experiences determines the bird’s future. Likewise, John Bowlby claimed that a disruption in the child’s attachment to its mother had grave consequences for his or her adult personality (Vicedo, 2009). It is my understanding that in Bowlby’s attachment theory, an anxious attachment style has a prolonged, more complicated effect upon grieving, a person with an anxious style of attachment may experience deeper levels of depression, contrary wise a secure attachment to the deceased, may indicate less depression and aid the transition through grieving and the recovery from it. This may be that in an anxious state of attachment the deceased may not have been emotionally available to the bereaved, and therefore the bereaved person may over-activate their grief response. There are several limitations to Bowlby’s attachment theory the first being that the model was based upon young children utilising momentary separations, which were stressful for the child, more understanding could come from an observation of how parents interact with the child and what they provide for each other during natural, non-stressful situations. How children interact with their parents in a non-stressful situation may provide more information on how the attachment model works than how the child acts when the mother leaves and then returns. Secondary to this the observations took place utilising only the primary caregiver, for example, the mother and other family attachments may not be characterised by similar reactions. Finally, the father or a sibling may have the same attachment with the child at the same time, relating directly to adults having more than one primary attachment, such as significant other and their children. This shows that attachment is not merely confined to infancy but experienced countless times throughout life including adolescence, early adulthood and beyond. There are several models of grieving that can be explored in relation to disenfranchised grief, firstly the five stages of grief Kubler-Ross (2005) states that the five stages of grief, have evolved since their introduction and have been very misunderstood over the past decades. She goes on the say that they were never meant to help tuck messy emotions into neat packages. We can apply some of the stages of grief to C in that she has experienced anger, mainly at herself for putting her children in a position where violence was occurring in her relationship and being in a place emotionally where she felt she needed drugs and alcohol to cope but mainly not being the parent that her children deserved. She has experienced an initial denial when the children were first placed with social services and again when they were put up for adoption and she has experienced depression. In relation to the baby that died the stages of grief can be seen although not in their entirety, some denial or disbelief may have been present when she received the diagnosis of Edwards syndrome, however, from her disclosures it seems quite matter of fact, the baby was ill and a deci>GET ANSWER