General Speech Standards Question for Video:
· Do you think the speaker considered his/her audience? Why or why not?
· Was the Speech Communication Process successful?
· How did the speaker focus and develop his her topic?
· Did the speech have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion?
· Did the speaker make eye contact with the audience? · Did the speaker use an extemporaneous speaking style?
· Did the speaker vary his/her tone of voice as appropriate, speak loudly enough and pace him/herself well?
· Did the speaker maintain an alert posture throughout the delivery and use natural gestures?
· Did the speaker avoid distracting mannerisms?
· Is the speaker audience-centered? Explain your response
. · Do you think the speaker completed a demographic audience analysis (age, gender, religion, sexual orientation, group membership, and racial, ethnic, or cultural background)? How do you know? If not, what should he have considered for this particular topic?
· Was there any evidence of stereotyping?
· Were there instances where the speaker had to adapt to audience the audience during the speech? If not, give a hypothetical example of how he might have had to.
The advancement of an ethical character is a scholarly subject that has been contended for a long time. Numerous rationalists have contended the purpose of their reality with the perplexity of this subject. This has enabled the thinkers to approach this theme in different ways. These thinkers are Aristotle (in the Nicomachean Ethics), Confucius (in Analects) and Plato (in Apology, Phaedo). To investigate these savants basically, it is critical to assess their point of view contentions and what they are endeavoring to state. In the wake of introducing look into of these savants, we will be in the situation of building up to what they concur or differ with respect to the improvement of an ethical character. An ethical character is characterized as a thought where one is one of a kind and can be recognized from others. Maybe it can gather characteristics and attributes that are unique in relation to different people. It infers to how people act, or how they communicate. In another words, it is "human perfection," or special musings of a character. At the point when the idea of temperance is spoken, this would stress the uniqueness or claim to fame, however everything includes the mix of characteristics that make an individual the manner in which the person is. In light of this definition, the understanding of an ethical character can be seen in an unexpected way. In spite of the fact that these thinkers veer with their contentions, they in some sense have similitudes. These likenesses will indicate how the matter of a character is significant and pivotal to the human instinct. Nicomachean Ethnics is an exceptional work written in 350 B.C by Aristotle. His work was centered around the significance of advancement and conduct among idealistic characters. Aristotle cleared up the significance of ethnical conduct, and how activities assume a job where an individual performs. "Eudaimonia," is in respect to the how an ethical character creates. It is an end in itself. Aristotle contended that it was known as an objective of a sound life. Aristotle is among the savants whom gave an extraordinary understanding of a highminded character. He states, "Greatness [of character], at that point, is a state worried about decision, lying in a mean with respect to us, this being dictated by reason and in the manner by which the man of handy knowledge would decide it. Presently it is a mean between two indecencies, which relies upon abundance and that which rely upon deformity." A character is a state, while, the activities decide the manner in which the individual demonstrations. A righteous character isn't an inclination or minor propensity to carry on with a specific goal in mind. Aristotle makes a contention about various ethics. Temperances identify with the sentiments and activities from every person. For instance, the ideals of a casual individual might be cleared up with terrible temper. Moreover, Aristotle contended that individuals get irate at specific things and repetitively venturing up to what the person in question believes is correct. Then again, as Aristotle expresses, the inadequate of this character is cruel and unsuitable. Despite any circumstance, it is improper to turned out to be furious when it isn't justified, despite any potential benefits. In the case of doing as such, the again demonstrates a lacking non-temperate good character. Aristotle additionally alludes to any non-temperate individual by inward uncertainty and difficulties. Despite the fact that the individual might be resolute or neglectful, the person must almost certainly pay special mind to mates to pardon their activities. Aristotle contends that these horrendous individuals are not ready to have faith in themselves. Then again, upright people, gain joy in their activities. "For in talking about a man's character we don't state that he is savvy>GET ANSWER