You are a film producer about to make a film version of the play The boy in the tree house by Drew Hayden Taylor. There are many things to consider when adapting a play, which is written for the stage, to the big screen.
1. Create a bulletin board with images and notes to answer all of the following production questions. Each question below should be answered with a visual image and exact answer to each question and a brief written explanation why you choose that answer
Who is your targeted audience for the film?
On what theme in the play will you focus in the film?
What symbols, actions, or objects will you use to develop the theme?
What sets will you use (inside/outside)? Where will you locate the action?
What style or genre will suit this film?
Who will you cast in the lead roles? Why would they do well with those roles?
What significant songs or music will you use for the soundtrack? Why?
How has British personality and frame of mind changed since the 1950s? Presentation Numerous individuals think that its hard to adapt to changes in individuals' frames of mind and personality, especially since the 1950s. They battle with the course in which society seems, by all accounts, to be going. The extending idea of contemporary society implies that there are more open doors for individuals, this combined with an extension in aptitudes and a less dictator demeanor in the working environment gives individuals more noteworthy individual opportunity. Nonetheless, the proceeding with changes that have occurred in the public eye in the course of the most recent fifty years necessitates that individuals build up a more noteworthy flexibility concerning their own characters their frame of mind towards self and society. They should be prepared to move alongside the rate of progress and this requires a relating change by they way they comprehend themselves. Accordingly, for Giddens (1991), oneself is a continuous undertaking whereby character is made and changed to meet the states of present day life. This paper will take a gander at how British character and frame of mind have changed since the 1950s. There will be a concise take a gander at what life resembled in nineteen fifties and how personality was comprehended. This will at that point be contrasted with frames of mind and character today to feature the changes. 1950s Britain Post-war Britain was very unique to today. In the mid 1950s there was still a decent arrangement of war harm which drove the Government to acquaint gigantic building programs with guarantee sufficient lodging for the populace. Following the war the welfare state was set up. The financing of this depended on the thought that the (prevalently male) workforce would keep on having full business, which drove the Government to guarantee that it is ready to care for its residents from the support to the grave. They were excessively hopeful in their perspectives and over the most recent fifty years Britain has seen gigantic changes in both welfare and business work and welfare. Dispositions have changed towards family structures and this, alongside other social changes, has had comparing suggestions for people groups' characters. In the years following the Second World War individuals felt that they were secure in their work. In industry average workers men were molded to the view that on the off chance that they buckled down, they would have an occupation forever, despite the fact that they might not have earned a great deal of cash (Giddens, 2001). This is not true anymore in any case, and is one of the numerous reasons that there are presently such a large number of ladies in the workforce (Abbott and Wallace, 1997). In 1950s Britain society was obviously class ridden and individuals did not frequently move starting with one class then onto the next. The class into which an individual was brought into the world consequently was all the time the one in which they stayed and this had ramifications for their life risks in different territories. Individuals did not have the decisions that they have these days couple of ladies went out to work and it was the dad's obligation to go out and procure cash to help his family (Walby, 1986). In the years since the nineteen fifties the essence of Britain has adjusted. There have been enormous changes in work examples and this has, as a rule, prompted changing jobs in the public arena which has had further ramifications for individuals' feeling of personality. Post-War movement alongside fast social and mechanical change has carried with it n expanding center around contemporary racialised and ethnicised personalities. This blending of new characters alongside more seasoned ones, and the presentation of new social structures adds to the feeling of vulnerability that numerous individuals feel is a component of current life (Hall, 1992). English Identity The idea of personality is critical in sociological reasoning, besides, developments of character are likewise firmly connected to culture and individuals' personalities are reflected in the way of life and sub-societies to which they have a place (Willis, 1967).Smith (1991) claims that in Britain during the 1950s there was a genuinely homogenous social, refined feeling of Britishness, which dated back to the sixteenth century. The British country state, in this manner was, basically, seen as English with components taken from Wales and Scotland. Langlands (1999) keeps up that: As it is valid for every national character, the implications and saliency joined to Englishness are liquid and have fluctuated significantly; it has at a few times drawn upon Celtic sources; and at different occasions it has been conflated with Britishness (the fantasy of our island race for example) (Langlands, 1999:60). The Arts Council was built up in 1947. This was an endeavor to bring workmanship to however many individuals as could be expected under the circumstances. Expressive dance, Opera and the performance center were attention and held up as models of British social life. Amid the 1950s collectivist arrangements were sought after which brought about social solidness. Social legacy is of incredible significance. (the National Heritage site lets us know) it is likewise urgent to the development of characters and to social conduct (Turnpenny, 2004). These arrangements which advanced what were viewed as 'high' culture were steady until the late nineteen seventies. The developing number of foreigners was changing the manner in which Britain looked and the manner in which it needed to discover new understandings of itself By the 1970s things had changed and suppositions on the extreme left held every single social incentive as an impression of the interests of white working class guys (Abbott and Wallace, 1997).. In the nineteen eighties the market standards of Margaret Thatcher's Government implied that craftsmanship needed to legitimize its proceeded with presence based on its attractiveness. In 1986 the social approach guides to the Greater London Council composed: During a time when we realize longer hope to locate a solitary comprehensive truth, the best systems for survival regularly include making elective, select domains, which dismiss prevailing modes (Mulgan and Worpole, 1986:32) At the point when New Labor came to control during the 1990s it assumed control components of the left and the privilege trying to advance a progressively assorted and comprehensive perspective of culture and social legacy (Pearce, 2000). Pearce fights that: Social legacy is something that can be acquired, which empowers the inheritors to go into their legitimate states and be their actual selves (Pearce, 2000:59). This social legacy comprises of antiquities, practices, objects and social spaces which individuals perceive as a component of their social legacy. Turnpenny (2004) keeps up that this legacy identifies with all parts of a country's life. Current social arrangement focuses on structures or landmark, making legacy firmly characterized and denying more extensive social elucidation (Turnpenny, on the same page). Social practices which are a wellspring of gathering character have been discarded from Government enactment on social legacy yet they conventional, and social criticalness and ought to accordingly be considered as a component of our social legacy (Jones, 1996). Turnpenny (2004) contends this is harsh as it doesn't consider network esteems and the networks' impression of their social legacy and it therefore adds to social prohibition. Current social arrangement, in its disregard of the immaterial, isolates truth from esteem. In doing as such it forces a type of national character that does not really mirror the personality of local gatherings in Britain. Changes in the public arena influence social structures which thus influence individuals' personalities in horde ways. Since characters are never again settled, yet as Bradley (1996) has contended are cracked, they are a wellspring of proceeding with vulnerability. This vulnerability prompts further changes in the social structure. Contemporary individuals' personalities are disrupted in light of the fact that the progressions referenced above will in general cross ethnic limits. For instance the changing job of ladies and their more prominent consideration in the work advertise has influenced not exclusively ladies' and men's characters, it has likewise prompted changes in family structures. Changing Attitudes and the Family In the course of the most recent fifty years, Britain has seen changes in marriage, family, and family shapes that would not have been thought conceivable before the Second World War (Giddens, 2001). The ascent in the separation rate and the quantity of single parent families, has to a great extent been faulted for the 1960s ascent of the women's activist development. There has likewise been a development in the rate of ladies who have kids yet have not hitched (Social Trends, 2000). Demeanors have changed impressively in such manner and it is uncommon to know about the desolate old maid. Individuals don't feel that ladies who would prefer not to wed are somehow or another unusual. Parsons (1955) contended that (what has been called)the customary family fills two noteworthy needs that are regular to social orders, the essential socialization of kids into the standards and estimations of society, and the adjustment of grown-up identities. For Parsons the establishment of the family gave the common love and bolster required by people with the goal for them to be fit enough to take their places in the public eye (Giddens, 2001). In 1997 when Blair's Government came to control the above belief system of the family that had existed in Britain for right around a century was separating and joblessness was proceeding to rise. Passing, separate, and the ascent in the quantity of single parent families implied that the conventional perfect of the male provider and the female carer/homemaker were winding up less normal (Giddens, 2001). Single parents (in spite of the fact that not a solid top pick) were never again observed as disgraced ladies, as they may have been in the nineteen fifties. The worries of the Welfare State were with the customary, family unit where the man was the provider and the lady thought about the home and kids. It was not along these lines, set up to manage single parent family units. Along these lines changing family structures result in an expansion in other social issues, especially destitution (Giddens, 2001). Customary family structures are never again the nor>GET ANSWER