Ethical perspectives work in real-world scenarios

by | Jan 23, 2023 | ethics

 

Imagine that individuals within the community action group are meeting to share the social issue they have chosen and the ethical perspective they might use as they consider solutions. Some tensions have popped up in the action group. Your community action small group consists of five people. Two members of the group are highly engaged and seem to work well together. One member of the group, however, is controlling and wants to push their ideas and perspectives on other members of the group. Another member of the group is going through some difficult personal challenges and is not able to participate as much as he would like. Finally, one male team member keeps interrupting a female team member when she shares ideas with the rest of the group.
Complete Parts 1 and 2 below.
Part 1
Identify how someone with each ethical perspective listed in the first column would approach the group and individual members in this scenario by answering the questions in the remaining columns.
Ethical Perspective- Deontology (Ethics of Duty):
1. Based on this ethical perspective, what are the needs of the group in the scenario?
2. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the controlling group member?
3. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the group member dealing with personal challenges?
4. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the male group member that keeps interrupting the female team member?
Ethical Perspective- Rights Ethics:
1. Based on this ethical perspective, what are the needs of the group in the scenario?
2. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the controlling group member?
3. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the group member dealing with personal challenges?
4. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the male group member that keeps interrupting the female team member?
Ethical Perspective -Ethical Egoism:
1. Based on this ethical perspective, what are the needs of the group in the scenario?
2. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the controlling group member?
3. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the group member dealing with personal challenges?
4. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the male group member that keeps interrupting the female team member?
Ethical Perspective – Utilitarianism:
1. Based on this ethical perspective, what are the needs of the group in the scenario?
2. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the controlling group member?
3. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the group member dealing with personal challenges?
4. How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the male group member that keeps interrupting the female team member?
Part 2
Write a 350- to 700-word analysis of the ways the ethical perspectives presented can impact real-world scenarios, particularly in the workplace:
• Explain how the different ethical perspectives work in real-world scenarios.
• Briefly describe a situation that has happened in your life or that you are familiar with where you experienced or were told about these ethical perspectives.
o In this situation, explain how the needs of the individual can be balanced with the needs of the larger group.
• Explain the benefits, as well as any downfalls, of these ethical perspectives.

 

 

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer