In your own words, explain what CSR is. Name two examples of socially responsible companies you know and explain why you consider them so.
It is important for companies to incorporate social responsibility into their strategic plans. Give a brief summary of the company you chose (ExxonMobil) in Week 1. What aspects of corporate social responsibility would you recommend they incorporate into its strategic plan? Support your rationale from your research.
Prior to beginning this discussion, review Chapter 11 in the Abraham’s textbook on Diversified, Global, and Other Types of Organizations and listen to this audio snippet covering International Strategies. When companies expand into the international arena, they do so either because their home market has matured or because they see real opportunities in the foreign market.
Increasing the number of strategic business units requires a more complex business strategy. Sometimes the road to success in a foreign market can be a bumpy one. For insights into some of the more extreme cultural challenges posed when entering foreign markets as experienced by one of the United States’ largest fast food chains, read How McDonald’s conquered IndiaLinks to an external site. (Kannan, 2014) and McDonald’s Settles Beef Over FriesLinks to an external site. (Grace, 2002).
For this discussion, determine whether or not the company operates in the international marketplace. If so, research the company’s international strategy and evaluate it in terms of effectiveness in regards to one of the issues below. If your company is not involved internationally, then choose one that is and evaluate that company’s international strategy in terms of effectiveness in regards to one of the following issues:
· Cultural Barriers
· Monetary Exchange Rates
· Political Instability
Then,
· Assess how your chosen issue potentially affects the strategic considerations of your organization involved in a global economic environment.
· Propose language to add to the organization’s strategic plan that addresses the potential impacts to the organization’s global strategy.
Constitutional law seminal cases of Marbury v. Madison and Ex parte McCardle were the original Court considerations of the limits and scope of judicial interpretation. Following a reading of these cases and the completion of a review of this week’s reading and video assignment, take an advocacy position on one side of the constitutional review debate and defend it with reference to at least two (2) outside resources.
You should discuss the merits of either “strict constructionism” or “interpretivism” as it relates to both the general process of judicial review and the specific application of that system of review of a specific fundamental right. For example, you should consider the impact of your kind of judicial review upon our contemporary society in the practice of religion or our freedom of speech.
Constitutional law seminal cases of Marbury v. Madison and Ex parte McCardle were the original Court considerations of the limits and scope of judicial interpretation. Following a reading of these cases and the completion of a review of this week’s reading and video assignment, take an advocacy position on one side of the constitutional review debate and defend it with reference to at least two (2) outside resources.
You should discuss the merits of either “strict constructionism” or “interpretivism” as it relates to both the general process of judicial review and the specific application of that system of review of a specific fundamental right. For example, you should consider the impact of your kind of judicial review upon our contemporary society in the practice of religion or our freedom of speech.