Review again the DHS Strategic Plan for fiscal years 2020-2024. Based on what you have learned over the term, provide an analysis of the plan by listing and commenting on three “ups” (positive features) and three “downs” (things that should be improved upon) of the plan. Please make a note of changes to your positives and improvements and why you changed your responses from Week 1.
https://www.fema.gov/about/strategic-plan
Sample Solution
1. Comprehensive Approach: The plan outlines a comprehensive approach to addressing the issues faced by communities across the United States, looking at multiple facets of these problems such as economic security and justice system reform in order to create effective solutions.
2. Focus on Vulnerable Populations: A central focus of this strategy is on providing support for vulnerable populations such as veterans, seniors, and those affected by disasters or public health emergencies – allowing them better access to services they may not otherwise have available.
3. Strong Partnerships: The plan highlights strong partnerships between local agencies and other stakeholders like non-profits, faith-based organizations, universities, businesses etc., making it easier for initiatives to be effectively implemented with greater participation from all involved parties.
Downs:
1. Lack of Budget Security: Despite mentioning plans for longterm financial sustainability within the discussion document there is no guarantee that funding will remain consistent over time; meaning programs must find alternative means of support or risk being cut due to budget constraints or political changes beyond their control.
2. Limited Community Participation Opportunities: Although some external community involvement is mentioned throughout the strategy document there are limited actual details provided regarding how citizens can get involved in practical ways beyond spreading awareness about DHS initiatives – leaving little room for meaningful engagement with disadvantaged individuals who could benefit most from their work.
3. Inadequate Oversight Measures :Finally while monitoring & evaluation processes are briefly discussed in terms of progress tracking more specific steps should be taken concerning evaluation criteria used when assessing effectiveness so as ensure implementation standards are being met during every phase of operations!
Sample Solution
1. Comprehensive Approach: The plan outlines a comprehensive approach to addressing the issues faced by communities across the United States, looking at multiple facets of these problems such as economic security and justice system reform in order to create effective solutions.
2. Focus on Vulnerable Populations: A central focus of this strategy is on providing support for vulnerable populations such as veterans, seniors, and those affected by disasters or public health emergencies – allowing them better access to services they may not otherwise have available.
3. Strong Partnerships: The plan highlights strong partnerships between local agencies and other stakeholders like non-profits, faith-based organizations, universities, businesses etc., making it easier for initiatives to be effectively implemented with greater participation from all involved parties.
Downs:
1. Lack of Budget Security: Despite mentioning plans for longterm financial sustainability within the discussion document there is no guarantee that funding will remain consistent over time; meaning programs must find alternative means of support or risk being cut due to budget constraints or political changes beyond their control.
2. Limited Community Participation Opportunities: Although some external community involvement is mentioned throughout the strategy document there are limited actual details provided regarding how citizens can get involved in practical ways beyond spreading awareness about DHS initiatives – leaving little room for meaningful engagement with disadvantaged individuals who could benefit most from their work.
3. Inadequate Oversight Measures :Finally while monitoring & evaluation processes are briefly discussed in terms of progress tracking more specific steps should be taken concerning evaluation criteria used when assessing effectiveness so as ensure implementation standards are being met during every phase of operations!