WRITTEN CASE BRIEF POM Wonderful, LLC V. Federal Trade Commission
The brief should include
1. Facts
2. Procedural History
3. Issues
4. Reasoning/Analysis
Decisions/Holding
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Solution
Pom Wonderful LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, 793 F.3d 1016 (D.C Cir 2015) was a case in which Pom Wonderful LLC (“Pom”), a company that makes and markets pomegranate-based products, appealed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) which found that Pom’s advertising claims regarding its antioxidant health benefits were false and unsubstantiated.
Sample Solution
Pom Wonderful LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, 793 F.3d 1016 (D.C Cir 2015) was a case in which Pom Wonderful LLC (“Pom”), a company that makes and markets pomegranate-based products, appealed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) which found that Pom’s advertising claims regarding its antioxidant health benefits were false and unsubstantiated.
The facts of the case revolved around whether Pom could make specific health claims about its pomegranate juice including that it can treat or reduce the risk of diseases such as prostate cancer without prior approval from FTC for each such claim made . The FTC argued that even though some scientific studies showed them to be true ,they did not meet the level scrutiny required by law so as deemed reliable enough warrant being used marketing purposes and thus should not have been used at all in light thereof.
The issue before the court was whether or not Pom had violated Section 5 of the FTC Act which requires companies to possess scientific evidence to support their product health claims when making them publicly available; if they lack said evidence then those further proceedings might taken place accordingly thereto.
During reasoning analysis Court determined that there existed sufficient evidence showing efficacy certain health related treatments associated with use POM products yet this alone did not necessarily mean they needed approved by FTC first order market same since other factors such as degree trustworthiness associated data collected during research processes needed taken into account when assessing overall effectiveness any given statement/claim made .Therefore Court ultimately held favor FEC ruling against POM stating that although some evidence existed supporting same fact remained still need substantiated more thoroughly order deemed reliable whatsoever based on current standards law.< br >In conclusion The D.C Circuit upheld the decision made by the Federal Trade Commission finding it reasonable under existing laws governing such matters meaningfully concluding case herewith simultaneously providing guidance applicable field moving forward likewise