Essay on students should be able to change a college curriculum due to their objectives
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Empowering Students: The Importance of Allowing Curriculum Changes to Align with Objectives
Education is a transformative journey that should empower students to pursue their passions, interests, and career goals. To ensure that students are fully engaged and motivated in their academic pursuits, it is crucial to provide them with the flexibility to modify the college curriculum in alignment with their objectives. Allowing students to change a college curriculum not only fosters a sense of ownership over their education but also enhances their overall college experience and future success.
Firstly, enabling students to tailor the curriculum to their objectives promotes a sense of autonomy and responsibility for their learning. Each student has unique aspirations and interests, and a rigid curriculum may not always cater to their specific needs. By granting students the ability to make curriculum changes, they can take control of their education, choosing courses that align with their passions, strengths, and future career goals. This sense of agency empowers students to be active participants in shaping their own academic journey.
Moreover, modifying the curriculum allows students to explore interdisciplinary fields and gain a broader perspective on their chosen area of study. In today’s interconnected world, many professions require a multidisciplinary approach. Allowing students to customize their curriculum enables them to combine courses from different disciplines, fostering creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. This flexibility encourages students to explore diverse areas of knowledge and develop a well-rounded skill set that can adapt to an ever-evolving job market.
Furthermore, the ability to change a college curriculum encourages students to pursue their passions and tap into their intrinsic motivation. When students are genuinely interested in what they are learning, they are more likely to be actively engaged in the classroom, participate in discussions, and go beyond the minimum requirements. By aligning the curriculum with their objectives, students can pursue subjects that truly inspire them, leading to a deeper understanding and retention of knowledge. This enthusiasm for learning sets the stage for lifelong learning and personal growth.
Critics may argue that allowing curriculum changes could disrupt the structure and coherence of an established program. However, it is essential to strike a balance between core requirements and elective options. Core courses provide a foundation of knowledge necessary for a well-rounded education, while elective courses offer the flexibility for students to delve deeper into their areas of interest. By incorporating appropriate guidelines and advising support, colleges can ensure that curriculum modifications are purposeful and aligned with students’ academic and career goals.
In conclusion, granting students the ability to change a college curriculum based on their objectives is crucial for empowering them in their educational journey. Allowing customization promotes autonomy, interdisciplinary learning, and intrinsic motivation. By embracing curriculum modifications, colleges can create an environment where students are actively engaged in their education and empowered to pursue their passions. Ultimately, this flexibility not only enhances the college experience but also equips students with the knowledge and skills necessary for success in their chosen careers.
