Not-for-profit organizations use many fundraising strategies to accomplish their missions. Some of these strategies include planned giving, grants, corporate gifts, sponsorships, and individual contributions.
Answer the following questions in your initial discussion post:
• If you were the CEO of a not-for-profit organization, which two fundraising methods would you choose, and why?
• Provide a link to the website of the not-for-profit organization you chose for your final project.
• How is this organization using its website to solicit funds and donors? Do you believe that the organization’s approach is effective? Why, or why not?
In your responses to your peers, suggest a way to overcome the disadvantages of the fundraising methods that they identified.

 

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

If I were the CEO of a not-for-profit organization, the two fundraising methods I would choose are grants and individual contributions. Grants are a popular fundraising strategy for not-for-profit organizations because they provide a significant amount of funding that can be used to support various programs and initiatives. Grants are typically awarded by foundations, corporations, or government agencies and are often based on specific criteria or requirements. By actively pursuing grants, an organization can secure substantial financial support and expand its impact.

Individual contributions, on the other hand, are an essential fundraising method for not-for-profit organizations. Individual donors provide financial support through one-time or recurring donations, membership fees, and crowdfunding campaigns. This strategy allows organizations to engage directly with their supporters and build a community of individuals who are passionate about their cause. Individual contributions also provide a steady stream of funding that can be used to support ongoing operations and drive long-term sustainability.

One not-for-profit organization that I have chosen for my final project is the American Cancer Society (ACS). Their website, which can be found at www.cancer.org, serves as a crucial platform for soliciting funds and donors. The ACS utilizes various approaches to encourage donations, such as prominently displaying a “Donate” button on their homepage and throughout the site. They also provide information on different ways to give, such as making a one-time donation, setting up a monthly gift, or leaving a legacy through planned giving.

Additionally, the ACS uses their website to highlight success stories and share the impact of donations. They provide information about how funds are used to support cancer research, patient services, and prevention efforts. They also offer resources for individuals who want to get involved in fundraising events like Relay For Life or Making Strides Against Breast Cancer.

Overall, I believe that the American Cancer Society’s approach to using their website for fundraising is effective. The website is user-friendly and provides clear and accessible information about how individuals can contribute and make a difference in the fight against cancer. By showcasing the impact of donations and offering various ways to give, the ACS effectively engages potential donors and encourages them to support their mission.

In response to my peers’ discussion posts, if they identified any disadvantages of the fundraising methods they chose, one way to overcome them could be through diversifying their approach. For example, if someone mentioned that grants have strict criteria and limited availability, they could consider exploring additional grant opportunities from different sources or diversifying their fundraising efforts by incorporating other methods like corporate sponsorships or planned giving. By expanding their strategies, organizations can mitigate potential drawbacks and increase their chances of success in fundraising endeavors.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer