Lucy Lightfingers steals a package of filet mignon priced at $19.99 from the meat counter in a supermarket. As she leaves the store, she is approached by a private security guard who works for the supermarket. Lightfingers kicks and injures the security guard in her attempt to leave with the meat she has stolen.

• What is the most serious crime (this means find only one crime from all those listed in this prompt) that Ms. Lightfingers could be charged with from the following: petit larceny, grand theft larceny, or robbery? Be specific as to the degree / statute number. This will require that you examine multiple degrees of each category (petit, grand, and robbery).
• Explain how the facts fit the crime you chose as opposed to the others. Meaning, why does it most appropriately meet one crime and why does it not meet the others, generally, to show me you understand why it would be excluded under the others.
• I have provided the links to the general area of the penal law where you can find these crimes:
• Petit larceny and grand larceny statutes https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/P3TJA155
• Robbery statutes https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/P3TJA160

 

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Based on the scenario provided, the most serious crime that Lucy Lightfingers could be charged with is Robbery in the Second Degree under New York Penal Law Section 160.10.

Explanation:

1. Robbery in the Second Degree (NY Penal Law Section 160.10):

– Robbery in the Second Degree involves forcibly stealing property accompanied by causing physical injury to another person.
– In this case, Lucy Lightfingers not only stole the package of filet mignon but also kicked and injured the security guard while attempting to leave with the stolen meat.
– The use of force resulting in physical injury to the security guard elevates the crime to Robbery in the Second Degree, which is a more serious offense than petit larceny or grand larceny.

2. Why Robbery in the Second Degree Fits:

– The act of injuring the security guard during the theft clearly falls under the definition of Robbery in the Second Degree, as it involves both the element of theft and causing physical harm to another person.
– The specific intent to inflict harm during the course of the theft aligns with the requirements of Robbery in the Second Degree.

3. Why It Does Not Fit Other Crimes:

– Petit Larceny: Petit larceny in New York involves theft of property valued at less than $1,000 without causing any physical injury. Since Lightfingers stole filet mignon valued at $19.99 and injured the security guard, petit larceny is not appropriate.
– Grand Larceny: Grand larceny in New York pertains to theft of property valued above a certain threshold depending on the circumstances. While the value of the stolen meat might meet grand larceny criteria, the element of physically injuring another person is not present in grand larceny cases.

By considering the specific circumstances of the case, including the theft of property coupled with causing physical injury to the security guard, Robbery in the Second Degree best aligns with Lucy Lightfingers’ actions and is the most appropriate charge in this scenario.

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer