Research paper on Proper Usage of Drugs and Chemicals in Food Animals
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Ensuring Proper Usage of Drugs and Chemicals in Food Animals: A Comprehensive Analysis
Abstract
The use of drugs and chemicals in food animals is a critical issue that impacts food safety, public health, and animal welfare. This research paper provides an in-depth examination of the proper usage of drugs and chemicals in food animals, focusing on the regulations, guidelines, risks, and benefits associated with their administration. By exploring the complexities of drug and chemical usage in food animal production, this paper aims to raise awareness about the importance of responsible practices to safeguard consumer health, mitigate antimicrobial resistance, and promote sustainable agriculture.
Keywords: drugs, chemicals, food animals, antimicrobial resistance, food safety, animal welfare
Introduction
The administration of drugs and chemicals in food animal production plays a crucial role in maintaining animal health, preventing diseases, and ensuring optimal productivity. However, improper usage of these substances can have detrimental effects on human health, the environment, and animal welfare. This research paper delves into the proper usage of drugs and chemicals in food animals, examining the regulatory frameworks, potential risks, benefits, and best practices associated with their application in livestock and poultry production.
Regulatory Framework
1. FDA Regulations
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the use of drugs in food animals to ensure that they are safe for consumption and do not pose risks to human health. The FDA approves veterinary drugs based on safety and efficacy evaluations, sets withdrawal periods to prevent harmful residues in food products, and monitors compliance with regulations through inspections and surveillance programs.
2. Antimicrobial Resistance
The overuse and misuse of antimicrobial drugs in food animals contribute to the development of antimicrobial resistance, a global public health threat. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria can spread from animals to humans through the food chain or environmental contamination, reducing the effectiveness of antibiotics for treating infections. Responsible antibiotic stewardship practices are essential to combat antimicrobial resistance and preserve the efficacy of these critical drugs.
Risks and Benefits
1. Risks of Improper Usage
Improper administration of drugs and chemicals in food animals can lead to residues in meat, milk, and eggs that exceed safe levels for human consumption. Residues of veterinary drugs can pose health risks to consumers, including allergic reactions, antibiotic resistance, and other adverse effects. Additionally, environmental contamination from runoff or improper disposal of chemicals can harm ecosystems and water sources.
2. Benefits of Proper Usage
When used responsibly and according to regulations, drugs and chemicals in food animals can contribute to maintaining animal health, preventing diseases, and ensuring food safety. Properly administered medications can alleviate suffering in sick animals, improve production efficiency, and support sustainable livestock farming practices. By following best management practices and adhering to regulatory guidelines, producers can minimize risks and maximize the benefits of drug and chemical usage in food animal production.
Conclusion
In conclusion, ensuring the proper usage of drugs and chemicals in food animals is essential for protecting consumer health, promoting animal welfare, and safeguarding the environment. By adhering to regulatory frameworks, practicing responsible drug stewardship, and implementing best management practices, producers can mitigate risks associated with drug and chemical usage while maximizing the benefits for both animals and consumers. It is imperative for stakeholders across the food supply chain to collaborate, educate, and advocate for sustainable and ethical practices in food animal production to ensure a safe, healthy, and resilient food system for present and future generations.
