Read the following article and respond to all questions below in your initial post: “Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: Quasi‐experimental evidence from Italy”Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader (Carrieri et al., 2019). Be sure to include a full APA reference for the article in your post.
Download and complete the CRAAP Test Download CRAAP TestOpen this document with ReadSpeaker docReaderworksheet by filling in a score for each of the 5 categories. Based on the CRAAP Test, Is this a credible article? Why or why not?
Why is it important to be able to determine whether information is credible in your role as a nurse?
In the introduction section of the article, the authors point to something specific that lends credibility to the argument they’re trying to make. What is it?
What are strategies that you can use in the workplace to ensure that you are using credible sources?
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Article Response: “Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: Quasi‐experimental evidence from Italy”
APA Reference: Carrieri, V., Madio, L., & Principe, F. (2019). Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: Quasi‐experimental evidence from Italy. Health Economics, 28(11), 1377-1382. [Link to the article](insert link here)
CRAAP Test Evaluation:
1. Currency: The article was published in 2019, which is relatively recent – Score: 4/5
2. Relevance: The topic of vaccine hesitancy and fake news is highly relevant in the healthcare field – Score: 5/5
3. Authority: The authors are identified as V. Carrieri, L. Madio, & F. Principe, and the article is published in a reputable journal – Score: 4/5
4. Accuracy: The article presents empirical evidence from a quasi-experimental study – Score: 5/5
5. Purpose: The purpose is to examine the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and fake news in Italy – Score: 5/5
Credibility Assessment: Based on the CRAAP Test evaluation, this article is deemed credible due to its recent publication, relevance to healthcare, author authority, accurate empirical evidence, and clear research purpose.
Importance of Determining Credibility as a Nurse: It is crucial for nurses to assess the credibility of information to provide evidence-based care, make informed clinical decisions, and educate patients effectively. Using credible sources ensures that nurses are up-to-date with accurate information to promote patient safety and well-being.
Specific Credibility Point in the Introduction: The authors establish credibility by highlighting the increasing prevalence of vaccine hesitancy globally and its potential impact on public health outcomes. This sets the stage for their study on the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and fake news in Italy, emphasizing the significance of addressing misinformation.
Strategies for Using Credible Sources in the Workplace:
1. Peer-Reviewed Journals: Rely on peer-reviewed journals for research articles and studies.
2. Author Expertise: Verify the expertise and credentials of authors contributing to healthcare literature.
3. Institutional Sources: Refer to reputable healthcare institutions, organizations, and government agencies for reliable information.
4. Critical Appraisal: Evaluate sources using tools like the CRAAP Test to assess credibility based on key criteria.
5. Continuing Education: Stay updated on current research and guidelines through professional development activities and reputable sources in nursing literature.
