Cross-Cultural Differences in Children’s Choices, Categorizations, and Evaluations of Truths and Lies

by | Jun 22, 2024 | Nursing

Carefully read the paper provided:Fu, G., Xu, F., Cameron, C.A., Heyman, G., Lee, K. (2011). Cross-cultural differences inchildrens choices, categorizations and evaluations of truths and lies. DevelopmentalPsychology, 43(2), pp. 278-293.Then write an essay to include the following:Drawing upon appropriate sources of information, and using theories from thismodule, critically evaluate differences in psychological perspectives between thecase study cultures, provide explanations of behaviour and experience acrosscultures and evaluate the significance of this. Evaluate the methods used forcarrying out the research by Fu et al. (2011), including ethical considerations.Please note the following instructions for the assignment:You will need to structure your assignment to include all aspects of the assignmentquestion. Headings are not to be used.Higher marks are awarded to those students that display an ability to evaluate and providea critical analysis of the case study material using theories from the module and informationfrom wider reading, including other research studies.Learning Outcomes:After completing the module, you should be able to:
1) Demonstrate knowledge and critical understanding of the contrasts in severalpsychological perspectives between cultures.
2) Demonstrate knowledge and critical understanding of conducting research withincross-cultural psychology (including ethical considerations.
3) Apply evidence based reasoning in evaluating differing explanations of behaviour.
4) Detect meaningful patterns in behaviour and experience across cultures and evaluatetheir significance.

 

 

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

Cross-Cultural Differences in Children’s Choices, Categorizations, and Evaluations of Truths and Lies

The study conducted by Fu, Xu, Cameron, Heyman, and Lee (2011) delves into the intriguing realm of cross-cultural differences in children’s perceptions of truths and lies. This essay will critically evaluate the psychological perspectives portrayed in the case study cultures, provide explanations for behaviors and experiences across cultures, and assess the significance of these differences. Furthermore, it will analyze the research methods employed by Fu et al. (2011), including ethical considerations.

Psychological Perspectives in Case Study Cultures

The case study by Fu et al. (2011) compared children from two distinct cultures – Chinese and Canadian. The findings indicated that Chinese children were more likely to categorize lies as truths compared to Canadian children. This disparity can be attributed to various psychological perspectives prevalent in each culture.

In Chinese culture, emphasis is placed on collectivism, harmony, and maintaining social relationships. Therefore, children might perceive lying as a means to protect relationships or uphold social harmony. On the other hand, Canadian culture tends to prioritize individualism and honesty as fundamental values. Canadian children may view lying negatively due to the emphasis on personal integrity and truthfulness.

Explanations for Behavior and Experience Across Cultures

The differences in children’s perceptions of truths and lies across cultures can also be understood through cultural schemas and socialization processes. Cultural schemas are cognitive frameworks that shape how individuals perceive and interpret the world around them. In the context of truth and lies, these schemas are influenced by societal norms, values, and expectations.

Moreover, socialization practices play a crucial role in shaping children’s moral development and understanding of honesty. In Chinese culture, children may be socialized to prioritize group harmony over individual honesty, leading to a different perspective on lying. In contrast, Canadian children may be taught the importance of personal integrity and truth-telling from a young age, influencing their categorizations and evaluations of truths and lies.

Significance of Cross-Cultural Differences

The significance of these cross-cultural differences lies in the broader implications for moral development, social interactions, and communication patterns. Understanding how cultural contexts shape children’s perceptions of honesty can help educators, parents, and policymakers design more culturally sensitive interventions and educational strategies. By recognizing and respecting these differences, individuals can foster intercultural understanding and promote effective communication across diverse cultural contexts.

Evaluation of Research Methods

Fu et al. (2011) utilized a mixed-method approach combining experimental tasks and interviews to gather data from Chinese and Canadian children. While this method allowed for a comprehensive understanding of children’s choices and evaluations of truths and lies, some limitations should be acknowledged.

Ethical considerations are paramount when conducting research with children, especially in cross-cultural settings. Fu et al. (2011) ensured informed consent from participants and maintained confidentiality throughout the study. However, cultural nuances and ethical standards may vary across different societies, necessitating a nuanced approach to ethical considerations in cross-cultural research.

In conclusion, the study by Fu et al. (2011) provides valuable insights into the cross-cultural differences in children’s perceptions of truths and lies. By critically evaluating psychological perspectives, explaining behaviors across cultures, and assessing the significance of these differences, we can deepen our understanding of how cultural contexts shape moral development. Additionally, by evaluating research methods and ethical considerations, we can enhance the rigor and ethical integrity of cross-cultural studies in psychology.

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer