Read carefully and complete it properly as requested. Please pay attention to the examples I attached and respond to the questions. Be on time or before please!

Your task throughout the duration of this course is to plan an ethics training program for an organization with which you are familiar, or in a hypothetical organization in a desired career field. Each week, you will be assigned chapters to read in the Program Planning textbook and will respond assigned “questions to consider” from the chapters. As we move forward in this course, your responses should not only include what you learned from reading the chapter, but how you are applying what you learned in the development of your educational program. You will also post the various program planning documents in the discussion forum for peer review and feedback.

The intent of these weekly discussions is for you to articulate what you learned from the chapter and to engage with each other to help each other better understand the content and how to apply it. This is graduate-level coursework, so your goal is not to simply memorize information, but to explain how you understand the information, how it applies in your given context/field, and how you can apply it now and into the future. Additionally, simple statements of agreement with your classmates are not welcome in the discussion. You should help each other learn, help each other see the differences in how course content might be applied in your given fields, and help each other better understand the complexities of developing training programs related to ethics.

Although there are required standards to meet in these discussions, I strongly recommend you approach this work in a more conversational, collaborative, informal manner. Each post, particularly your responses to classmates, does not have to be an essay.

Your questions to consider for Chapter 1 are:

What is your role as a program planner? If you are studying to be a planner (you are), what kind of planner would you like to be?
Using the scenario at the beginning of Chapter 1, how would you change the program the following year?

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

Discussion Post: Ethics Training Program Planning

Role as a Program Planner

As a program planner, my role is to design, implement, and evaluate educational programs that effectively address specific needs within an organization. This involves understanding the target audience, identifying gaps in knowledge or skills, and developing relevant training materials and activities that promote ethical behavior. In the context of my desired career field in corporate training, I aspire to be a planner who emphasizes the importance of ethical decision-making in the workplace. This means not only developing content that aligns with ethical standards but also fostering an environment where employees feel empowered to discuss ethical dilemmas openly.

In approaching my ethics training program, I recognize the importance of collaboration with stakeholders. Engaging with management, employees, and possibly external experts will help ensure the program is comprehensive and tailored to the organization’s culture. I envision myself as a facilitator who promotes dialogue about ethics rather than just disseminating information. By creating interactive sessions that involve real-life scenarios and role-playing exercises, participants can better internalize ethical principles and apply them in their daily work.

Changes to the Program for the Following Year

Reflecting on the scenario presented at the beginning of Chapter 1, I would make several changes to enhance the effectiveness of the ethics training program for the following year.

1. Feedback Incorporation: One of the primary changes would be to incorporate participant feedback more systematically. In the previous year, feedback collection may have been informal or insufficiently analyzed. This time, I would implement structured surveys and focus groups at the conclusion of each session to gather insights on what worked well and what could be improved.

2. Tailored Content: Based on the feedback collected, I would tailor the content to address specific ethical concerns identified by participants. For example, if employees express uncertainty about handling conflicts of interest, incorporating case studies relevant to their roles would be beneficial.

3. Ongoing Support: Instead of viewing the training as a one-time event, I would propose creating ongoing support mechanisms such as an ethics hotline or regular discussion forums where employees can bring up ethical dilemmas they encounter in their roles. This would foster a culture of continuous learning and make ethics a daily consideration rather than a box-ticking exercise.

4. Diverse Learning Methods: To cater to various learning styles and preferences, I would diversify the training methods used. This could include online modules, in-person workshops, and even gamified learning experiences that engage employees in a fun yet educational manner.

5. Assessment and Evaluation: Lastly, I would establish clear metrics for evaluating the program’s success. This could include pre- and post-training assessments to measure changes in knowledge and attitudes toward ethics, as well as tracking any reported ethical incidents within the organization before and after training sessions.

In summary, my aim as a program planner is to create an engaging and relevant ethics training program that not only informs but also transforms organizational culture around ethical practices. By incorporating feedback, tailoring content, providing ongoing support, diversifying learning methods, and establishing evaluation metrics, I believe we can create a robust program that resonates with employees and fosters an environment of integrity.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts on these ideas and how you might approach similar challenges in your own contexts!

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer