How do you keep personal bias out of decisions when you feel really strongly about something? I think that sometimes the bias are there and the individuals don’t even realize it. I think that it is very important for the teams that work on these types of decisions in an organization hold each other accountable for making a sound decision for the organization. If someone sees that one of their counterparts are making a decision fueled by personal bias that they should be able to say something in a professional manner to get them back on track. What does everyone else think?

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

That’s an excellent point. It’s crucial to be aware of our biases and to work diligently to mitigate their influence on decision-making. Here are some strategies to keep personal bias out of decisions:

Self-Awareness:

  • Recognize Your Biases: Identify your own biases and prejudices. This can be done through self-reflection, feedback from others, or personality assessments.
  • Challenge Your Assumptions: Question your assumptions and beliefs, especially when they differ from the evidence.

That’s an excellent point. It’s crucial to be aware of our biases and to work diligently to mitigate their influence on decision-making. Here are some strategies to keep personal bias out of decisions:

Self-Awareness:

  • Recognize Your Biases: Identify your own biases and prejudices. This can be done through self-reflection, feedback from others, or personality assessments.
  • Challenge Your Assumptions: Question your assumptions and beliefs, especially when they differ from the evidence.
  • Seek Diverse Perspectives: Surround yourself with people who have different backgrounds, experiences, and viewpoints.

Objective Decision-Making:

  • Focus on Facts: Base decisions on facts and evidence, rather than emotions or personal opinions.
  • Consider Multiple Perspectives: Evaluate the situation from different angles to gain a more comprehensive understanding.
  • Use Structured Decision-Making Tools: Employ tools like decision matrices or cost-benefit analyses to make rational choices.

Accountability and Transparency:

  • Establish Clear Decision-Making Processes: Implement processes that require multiple people to review and approve decisions.
  • Encourage Open Dialogue: Create a culture where people feel comfortable challenging each other’s assumptions and biases.
  • Use Data-Driven Decision Making: Rely on data and analytics to inform decisions.

By following these strategies, we can reduce the impact of personal bias and make more informed and objective decisions.

I agree with you that holding each other accountable is crucial. A culture of open and honest feedback, where team members feel empowered to challenge each other respectfully, is essential. By creating a safe and supportive environment, we can encourage critical thinking and minimize the influence of bias.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer