Business & Finance CSR – Corporate Social Responsibility

by | Feb 9, 2025 | essay

Corporate Social Performance is the configuration of a company’s Principles of Social Responsibility, Processes of Corporate Social Responsiveness and Outcomes of Social Action. In order to evaluate the social performance of an organization we need to understand the organization’s principles and values (what it believes in, and what guides its actions), and “how they do things”, or the processes used to produce its products/services.

pick two companies that your group admires – one small sized (less than 30 employees) and one large company (more than 500 employees).

Then, do some research on each of these two companies and find out:

Corporate social responsibility-related values and beliefs of each company (which are part of the company’s Culture)
Corporate responsible ways used by each of them that guide “how” they do things. For example, how do they procure their inputs, how they treat their employees, how they support the communities, etc.
Then write up your findings and conclusions comparing the two companies. Organize your writing using the following table (about 1,000 words).

Companies, Beliefs and Actions

Name of small company:

Name of large company:

Values and Beliefs for each

Actions: “How” they do things responsibly: for each:

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Companies, Beliefs, and Actions: A Comparative Analysis

This report analyzes the corporate social performance (CSP) of two companies, one small and one large, focusing on their values, beliefs, and responsible actions. The analysis aims to understand how each company integrates social responsibility into its operations and culture.

Name of small company: Patagonia (Though they have over 2000 employees, they started small and maintain a strong focus on their core values, making them a good example of a company with a small business mindset related to CSR even as they grow).

Companies, Beliefs, and Actions: A Comparative Analysis

This report analyzes the corporate social performance (CSP) of two companies, one small and one large, focusing on their values, beliefs, and responsible actions. The analysis aims to understand how each company integrates social responsibility into its operations and culture.

Name of small company: Patagonia (Though they have over 2000 employees, they started small and maintain a strong focus on their core values, making them a good example of a company with a small business mindset related to CSR even as they grow).

Name of large company: Unilever

Feature Patagonia Unilever
Values and Beliefs * Environmentalism: Deep commitment to protecting the environment and reducing their impact. <br> * Quality: Focus on producing durable, high-quality products. <br> * Fair Labor Practices: Commitment to fair wages and safe working conditions throughout their supply chain. <br> * Transparency: Open communication about their supply chain and environmental impact. <br> * Activism: Using their platform to advocate for environmental protection and social justice. * Sustainability: Central to their business strategy, with a focus on reducing environmental impact and improving social conditions. <br> * Positive Impact: Commitment to making a positive contribution to society through their products and operations. <br> * Fairness: Respecting human rights and promoting fair labor practices. <br> * Diversity and Inclusion: Creating a diverse and inclusive workplace. <br> * Health and Wellbeing: Improving health and hygiene through their products and initiatives.
Actions: “How” they do things responsibly * Supply Chain: Patagonia has a strong focus on ethical sourcing. They trace their supply chain to ensure fair labor practices and environmental responsibility. They use recycled materials whenever possible and have programs to reduce their environmental footprint. They are transparent about their suppliers and their challenges. <br> * Manufacturing: They prioritize reducing their environmental impact in manufacturing, using renewable energy and minimizing waste. They also offer repair services to extend the life of their products. <br> * Employee Treatment: Patagonia is known for its positive work environment and employee benefits. They offer flexible work arrangements and encourage employees to be involved in environmental activism. <br> * Community Support: They support environmental organizations and grassroots movements through grants and advocacy. They encourage employees to volunteer for environmental causes. <br> * Advocacy: Patagonia actively campaigns for environmental protection and social justice. They use their brand and platform to raise awareness about critical issues. * Sustainable Living Plan: Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan guides its actions. It focuses on improving health and wellbeing, reducing environmental impact, and enhancing livelihoods. <br> * Sustainable Sourcing: They are committed to sourcing raw materials sustainably, with a focus on palm oil, tea, cocoa, and other agricultural products. They work with farmers to improve their practices and reduce environmental impact. <br> * Environmental Impact Reduction: They have set ambitious targets for reducing their greenhouse gas emissions, water usage, and waste. They are also working to improve the sustainability of their packaging. <br> * Social Impact Programs: Unilever runs numerous programs to improve health, hygiene, and livelihoods in communities around the world. They focus on issues like sanitation, access to clean water, and women’s empowerment. <br> * Diversity and Inclusion: Unilever has programs to promote diversity and inclusion in its workforce and leadership.
Comparison and Conclusions Both Patagonia and Unilever demonstrate a strong commitment to CSP, but their approaches differ. Patagonia’s approach is deeply rooted in environmental activism and a focus on minimizing their environmental footprint. They emphasize transparency and advocate for systemic change. Their smaller size (relatively) allows them to be more agile and responsive to emerging issues. <br> Unilever, as a large multinational corporation, focuses on integrating sustainability into its core business strategy. Their Sustainable Living Plan provides a framework for their actions across a broad range of social and environmental issues. Their vast scale allows them to have a significant positive impact on global issues. <br> While Patagonia’s activism-driven approach might be more visible, Unilever’s large-scale initiatives have a broader reach. Both companies demonstrate that CSP can be a driver of innovation and business success, regardless of company size. They also show that different approaches can be effective, as long as they are authentic and aligned with the company’s values. <br> For smaller companies, a focus on local communities and direct engagement can be highly effective. For larger companies, systemic changes across their supply chain and operations are crucial. Ultimately, both companies show that CSP is not just about philanthropy; it’s about integrating social and environmental considerations into every aspect of the business.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer