Discuss migration to Europe from Syria or Ukraine. For this week’s discussion board, I want you to imagine that you have been asked to prepare a briefing for the European Commission’s Migration and Home Affairs department. Based on your knowledge of European history, and world geography, and the articles you’ve read, which of the following policies would you select as the best approach to migration to Europe from Syria or Ukraine?

1. Allow all migrants from Syria or Ukraine to enter Europe.

2. Only migrants who pass detailed background checks should be allowed. Those who do not pass background checks will be deported back to Syria or Ukraine.

3. Europe should prohibit migrants from entering Europe and should instead support safe refugee camps in or near Syria or Ukraine.

4. Europe should prohibit migrants from entering Europe and should instead intervene in Syria and Ukraine militarily.

5. Europe should proportionally allocate a set number of migrants for each country based on economic and demographic factors.

Explain why the approach you selected is the best way to handle this issue. Remember to cite evidence from the assigned articles in your initial response. Don’t forget to respond to two of your classmates before the discussion closes.

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Subject: Policy Recommendations for Migrant Influx from Syria and Ukraine

Introduction:

The ongoing conflicts in Syria and Ukraine have resulted in significant displacement, prompting large-scale migration towards Europe. This briefing examines potential policy approaches, considering historical precedents, geopolitical realities, and humanitarian imperatives.  

Policy Recommendation: Proportional Allocation (Option 5)

Based on a comprehensive analysis, I recommend that Europe adopt a policy of proportionally allocating a set number of migrants for each country based on economic and demographic factors. This approach offers the most balanced solution, addressing both humanitarian needs and the practical constraints of member states.

Subject: Policy Recommendations for Migrant Influx from Syria and Ukraine

Introduction:

The ongoing conflicts in Syria and Ukraine have resulted in significant displacement, prompting large-scale migration towards Europe. This briefing examines potential policy approaches, considering historical precedents, geopolitical realities, and humanitarian imperatives.  

Policy Recommendation: Proportional Allocation (Option 5)

Based on a comprehensive analysis, I recommend that Europe adopt a policy of proportionally allocating a set number of migrants for each country based on economic and demographic factors. This approach offers the most balanced solution, addressing both humanitarian needs and the practical constraints of member states.

Justification:

  • Humanitarian Responsibility:
    • Both the Syrian and Ukrainian crises involve widespread human suffering, necessitating a compassionate response. Europe has a moral obligation to provide refuge to those fleeing conflict.  
    • Option 1, “Allowing all migrants to enter,” while seemingly humane, is unsustainable and could overwhelm certain member states, leading to social and economic strain.
  • Practical Considerations:
    • Option 3, “Prohibiting entry and supporting refugee camps,” disregards the urgency of the situation and the vulnerability of those displaced. Refugee camps, while necessary, can become protracted and lack long-term solutions.  
    • Option 4, “Military intervention,” is a complex and potentially destabilizing option with uncertain outcomes. It also does not address the immediate needs of those who have already fled.
    • Option 2, detailed background checks and deportation, although necessary to a certain extent, is not a full solution. It does not address the sheer number of people in need, and it can be difficult to conduct accurate background checks in active war zones.
  • Equitable Distribution:
    • Proportional allocation ensures that the burden of migration is shared fairly among member states. This mitigates the risk of overwhelming any single country and promotes solidarity within the European Union.
    • Economic and demographic factors, such as GDP, population size, and labor market needs, can be used to determine allocation quotas. This ensures that countries with greater capacity contribute more.
    • This also helps to reduce the risk of social tension in individual countries that may become overwhelmed by a large influx of refugees.
  • Integration and Long-Term Stability:
    • A structured allocation system facilitates better integration of migrants into host societies. This includes access to housing, education, and employment opportunities.
    • By providing a pathway to integration, Europe can harness the potential of migrants to contribute to its economy and society.  

Evidence and Historical Context:

  • The European Union has faced similar migration challenges in the past, and proportional allocation has been discussed as a potential solution.
  • The handling of the refugee crisis of 2015 showed the problems that arise from a lack of proportional allocation, and the need for a more structured system.
  • Geographically, Europe is a destination for many people fleeing conflicts in the middle east and eastern europe.
  • The current situation in Ukraine demonstrates the need for rapid, and organized allocation of refugees.

Conclusion:

Proportional allocation represents the most pragmatic and humane approach to managing migration from Syria and Ukraine. It balances the need for humanitarian assistance with the practical constraints of member states, promoting solidarity and long-term stability

This question has been answered.

Get Answer