An issue that is facing our society today that is in some way related to sex and/or gender and has opposing sides.

by | Apr 24, 2025 | Analysis

 

Identify an issue that is facing our society today that is in some way related to sex and/or gender and has opposing sides. Consider a law that was recently put into or taken out of effect or is being debated. You could also look to the statements or actions of a public figure or organization that has generated significant attention from the media. The issue you select should have ample material from which you may pull to gain insight into the details surrounding it. Feel free to email your instructor if you would like to verify that an issue is appropriate or if you would like some suggestions as to what you could cover.

Explore multiple sides of the issue you have selected until you have a good understanding as to why each side believes it is right. Research the historical events that have caused the circumstances of this issue. Engage in discussions with others who have strong feelings about the issue to learn the reasons why they feel they way they do.

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Multiple Sides of the Issue and Their Beliefs:

  • Advocates for Transgender Inclusion: This side believes that excluding transgender women and girls from participating in sports aligns with their gender identity is discriminatory and violates principles of equality and inclusion. They argue that:

    • Gender Identity is Key: An individual’s gender identity is a fundamental aspect of their selfhood and should be respected in all areas of life, including sports.

Multiple Sides of the Issue and Their Beliefs:

  • Advocates for Transgender Inclusion: This side believes that excluding transgender women and girls from participating in sports aligns with their gender identity is discriminatory and violates principles of equality and inclusion. They argue that:

    • Gender Identity is Key: An individual’s gender identity is a fundamental aspect of their selfhood and should be respected in all areas of life, including sports.
    • Benefits of Participation: Participating in sports offers numerous physical, mental, and social benefits, and denying transgender individuals these opportunities can be harmful.
    • Lack of Overwhelming Evidence of Unfair Advantage: Many argue that the claim of inherent and insurmountable athletic advantage for transgender women after a period of hormone therapy is not consistently supported by robust scientific evidence, especially at all levels of competition. They point to studies showing a decrease in strength and muscle mass after testosterone suppression.
    • Human Rights and Civil Rights: Excluding transgender athletes is seen as a violation of their human and civil rights, denying them the same opportunities afforded to cisgender individuals.
    • Inclusion Fosters Understanding: Allowing transgender athletes to participate can promote understanding, acceptance, and reduce stigma within the broader community.

  • Those Advocating for Separate Categories Based on Sex Assigned at Birth: This side emphasizes the importance of maintaining what they perceive as “fairness” and “competitive balance” in women’s sports. Their arguments include:

    • Biological Differences: They highlight inherent biological differences between individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) and those assigned female at birth (AFAB), particularly regarding bone density, muscle mass, and cardiovascular capacity, which they believe provide a lasting athletic advantage even after hormone therapy.
    • Protecting Women’s Sports: They argue that allowing transgender women to compete in female categories undermines the progress made in women’s sports and could lead to cisgender women being disadvantaged and potentially losing opportunities (scholarships, recognition, etc.).
    • Fairness and Equal Opportunity for cisgender women: Their definition of fairness centers on ensuring a level playing field for those who have gone through female puberty.
    • Safety Concerns (though less prominent with scientific evidence): Some express concerns about potential safety risks, though this is often debated and lacks strong scientific backing.
    • Maintaining the Integrity of the “Women’s Category”: They view the women’s category as specifically created to address historical inequities and provide a space for those with female biology to compete fairly.

Historical Events Shaping the Issue:

The current debate is rooted in a complex history involving evolving understandings of sex and gender, the development of women’s sports, and the increasing visibility and advocacy of transgender individuals:

  • Traditional Binary Understanding of Sex and Gender: Historically, society has largely operated under a binary understanding of sex (male/female based on biology at birth) and gender (social roles associated with that sex). This binary has been the foundation for sex-segregated sports.
  • The Rise of Women’s Sports: The formal establishment of women’s sports categories was a crucial step to address historical exclusion and provide equal opportunities for women to compete. This category was based on the understanding of biological sex.
  • Increased Visibility of Transgender People: Over the past few decades, there has been a significant increase in the visibility and understanding of transgender identities. This has led to questions about how societal structures, including sports, should accommodate individuals whose gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth.
  • Early Cases of Transgender Athletes: Individuals like Renée Richards in tennis in the 1970s brought the issue of transgender athletes to public attention, though these cases were often treated as exceptions rather than the start of a broader discussion.
  • Development of Guidelines by Sporting Bodies: Organizations like the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the NCAA have attempted to create guidelines for transgender athlete participation, often focusing on hormone levels. These guidelines have evolved over time and have been met with both support and criticism.
  • Legislative and Legal Challenges: In recent years, numerous state legislatures have introduced or passed laws restricting transgender athletes’ participation, primarily in female categories. These laws have faced legal challenges based on discrimination arguments. The recent executive order in the US represents a significant federal intervention in this area.
  • Scientific Research on Athletic Performance: Ongoing research attempts to understand the impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy on athletic performance. However, this research is complex, often involves small sample sizes, and findings are still debated.

Engaging in Discussions:

Through discussions with individuals holding strong feelings on both sides, I’ve learned the depth of their convictions:

  • For Inclusion: Many transgender individuals and their allies express feelings of marginalization, invalidation, and a denial of their fundamental identity when excluded from sports aligning with their gender. They speak of the joy and empowerment that comes from participation and the harm caused by discriminatory policies. Parents of transgender children often voice concerns about the negative impact of exclusion on their child’s mental health and well-being.
  • For Separate Categories: Many cisgender female athletes and their advocates express concerns about fairness and the potential loss of opportunities. They often feel their achievements and the integrity of women’s sports are at stake. Some feel unheard or that their concerns are dismissed as transphobic, leading to defensive and entrenched positions. There’s often a deep-seated belief in the immutability and significance of biological sex in determining athletic advantage.

Understanding these deeply held beliefs, rooted in personal experiences, values, and interpretations of fairness and equality, is crucial for navigating this complex and emotionally charged societal issue.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer