Select a publicly traded company to research. Evaluate its human resource (HR) and business strategy, HR department job positions, and ways it markets its company regarding human capital. The following are some of the company websites that provide this information:
In addition, refer to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics website, which identifies detailed roles for HRM personnel and offers you some insight into HRM positions.
Write a 2–3 page paper in which you:
Explain how you would ensure the HR strategy is in alignment with the business strategy of your selected company.
Provide a detailed description of the HR Department job positions and associated responsibilities.
Determine which HR job positions you would prefer and explain why.
Analyze how the selected company can establish HRM strategies to improve competitive advantages.
Propose three ways your selected company can increase diversity and remain competitive in the industry.
Support your propositions, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with at least three credible, relevant, and appropriate sources synthesized in a coherent analysis.
Cite each source on your source list at least one time within your assignment.
For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
Write clearly and concisely in a manner that is well organized, grammatically correct, and free of spelling, typographical, formatting, and/or punctuation errors.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Propose how to align human resource strategies with business strategies to increase competitive advantage, including increasing diversity
e as suspending law but not creating new law, or necessity as excusing illegal conduct without rendering it legal, or suspending law, may allow for the exploitation of such a political gap by the executive without the adjudication of the legislature. In this way, one cannot acknowledge the legitimacy of extralegal action without weakening the conviction that legitimate action must accord with the law; by imbuing such authority to the executive, it may call into question the natural and authoritative law as set into place by the representatives of the legislature, thus undermining their jurisdiction over the regulation of the scope of prerogative. Furthermore, Locke’s prerogative theory is largely dependent upon the the legislature as representative of the people, and wider society as elected officials. The enforcement of both natural laws and the executive are, according the Lockean theory, dependent upon the support of the common good; “Such consent is expressed not only through voluntary compliance with a rule, but also through its persistent recognition as authoritative coupled with consistent efforts to adjudicate violations and coerce compliance.” Thus, it is critical that governments are charged by the consent of the individual, in order for the just execution of such prerogative powers at the hand of the executive; “i.e. the consent of the majority, giving it either by themselves, or their representatives chosen by them”. In this way, “the true basis of any “law,” whether constitutional or international, appears to be relatively universal acceptance of—or consent to—a rule within a relevant community.” It may however be considered that by endowing the executive with such scope regarding the use of prerogative that a state of tyranny may emerge as these powers become unchecked and thus exploited. This may occur situationally where it becomes difficult to distinguish between legitimate use of prerogative and tyranny; moreover alluring “the exercise of power beyond right”. It is in this case, Locke states, that dispute may emerge between the executive and the legislature; rule by legislation and rule by prerogative each preserve the political community and reflect its foundation out of the state of nature. Therefore, one may argue that therefore, the executive and the legislature do not easily coexist in the constitution, furthermore providing no means to judge the rightful use of prerogative.>GET ANSWER