Choose an artist (Realism, Edward Hopper) from any place and historical period. Research them in terms of the artist’s
reflection of the contemporary culture. Foreground an exploration of issues that represent your artist as a mirror and/or an
agent of change for the society and cultures in which they lived. (This is important point.) (His influence on society and
changes in society.)
Biographical information — Work, life, social class, gender, religious or spiritual affiliations
A critical discussion of culture as reflected in your artist’s work.
A critical discussion of the social conditions of the time, and your artist’s role and relationship to these issues.
Include 2 images (Morning Sun and Chop Suey) of the artist’s work and a visual analysis of each.
n small before it became small. Moreover, if things only became smaller, and not larger, eventually everything would be miniscule. And if it was the other way around, where everything only became larger, and not smaller, everything would eventually be one thing, because everything would have joined together. If this were the case then we would notice that things only become smaller, shorter, or uglier, and never their opposites, or vice versa. Socrates shows that things do transition from two opposites, by referencing to observable examples. He contrasts this to death, and claims that there has to be a cycle of becoming alive and becoming dead, or else everything would become dead, or vice versa. The analogies that Socrates uses are applicable to every corporeal thing in the universe. Everything is either large or small, tall or short, etcetera. He claims that there is a process of becoming from its opposite (e.g. something becoming larger from being small), and that this process is cyclical. For if everythi>GET ANSWER