First you need to send a prospectus of the Argumentative essay (200 words), then you need to send a draft of the essay and then send the Revised version of the argumentative essayProspectus – Argumentative Essay
Your prospectus should include what you plan to argue, the three reasons you have to support your thesis statement, as well as the counter argument you plan to respond to or confront.
Structurally, the argumentative essay should begin with an acknowledgement of your critics followed by a thesis statement that looks something like “I believe X, because PQR.”
In this formula, “X” is your main claim and PQR are the three distinct reasons that you will use to support X.
For example: Hancock is a racist movie about a black superhero (X) because Will Smith plays a lazy drunk (P), he needs a small white man (Jason Bateman) to interpret his actions and intentions for other white people so they accept him (Q), and finally, his kryptonite is literally a white woman (R).
First, you need an introduction:
The introduction sets the context and scope of your argument. It also (usually at the very end) includes a thesis statement that asserts the claim you plan to defend / support. The best way to do this is to start with criticisms to which you plan to respond. For the sake of examples, I’m going to take you through a truncated version of an essay titled “Roddenbery Vs. Disney: Why the Star Trek franchise is light years beyond Star Wars.” (Note about the importance of titles: They are the first place you get to do meta-commentary — the first place you get to talk, outside of the text, what your text is about.).
There are countless reddit arguments, movies and documentaries, and angsty fans who worship both of the “Star -” franchises. People love these Star Wars and Star Trek so much that arguing about which is better, is often a commonplace occurrence at game tables and dinner tables across the country; verily, the globe. Wars fans are dazzled and compelled by the age-old story about good versus evil and the magical powers of sabre-wielding aliens. To date, the Wars franchise is worth more money and according to some various wikipages, boasts a larger fan-base. That said, I maintain that Trek is the superior franchise because it takes place in a Marxist utopia where humans are no longer interested in the pursuit of individual wealth, it is vastly more complex than the tired Christian morality tale of good vs. evil, and most importantly, the Roddenberry estate didn’t sell out to Disney and watch its once great franchise turn into the hollowed out shell of hot garbage that now takes its place.
Agree or disagree, this is a good introduction paragraph because it establishes context, it acknowledges points that the other side might make in its defense, and it clearly establishes my position while offering distinct reasons for support. I like thesis statements like this because they are direct, but because they also structure the subsequent body paragraphs that will follow. In other words, my next paragraph is going to be about the “Marxist utopia.” The third paragraph will be about the tired cliche and repetitious plot lines. The fourth paragraph will be about how Disney is terrible and a plague upon culture. The reader should expect this structure to follow from that kind of thesis statement.
There should be a sustained counter argument. Around paragraph 5 or so, you need to have a fair counter argument wherein you make certain concessions. Finally, you need a conclusion. Now, here’s where things might get a little different. I assume most of you have been told that a conclusion needs to reiterate and restate your main points. THIS IS WRONG. Do not do this. My attention span is longer than 5 pages, and I will remember what you said in your introduction. More importantly, there are simply better ways to end an argument than to repeat yourself. The conclusion should serve as a Call To Action. In other words, what do you want your audience to do now, as a result of reading your argument? In most academic settings, this is a call for more research and another concession that some things are beyond the scope of this paper. For your purposes, a call to action can go one of two ways — positive or negative. You can tell people what they will gain if they simply accept your position, or you can tell people what they stand to lose. You can use hope. You can use fear. Ethically speaking, people generally are more keen to hope, but fear is not without its usefulness and we would be fools to underestimate it. I’m not going to write a conclusion for my Star Trek / Star Wars argument, because for this assignment, you will do it.
Here is another example of an argumentative essay: Why a Fish is Not a Good First Pet Revised (1).docx
Socialism is a ceased political hypothesis. It has never been drilled in the United States. It is normally positioned in an entirely precarious world of politics like Cuba and China. A typical agreement on socialism is this is a generally excellent thought, yet actually it isn't excessively acceptable. Individuals consistently prefer to settle on choices themselves. Karl Marx is known as the "father" of Communism. He composed the "Socialist Faction Declaration" in 1848, he was accordingly perceived. "Network" is a shapeless term on the off chance that it is utilized equivalently with "gathering". People are individuals from numerous gatherings and are along these lines part of numerous networks. School is a network. The people group is a network. The city is a network. The expert is a network. The congregation is a network. Subsequently, schools are a) networks, b) substances in bigger networks, and c) littler networks. That implies excessively, the network has neither rhyme nor reason. Schools examine well about their associations with the network. This shows that the school is not the same as the network. Undoubtedly, schools exist in covering networks and can go about as networks themselves. The people group is a gathering of individuals who are identified with one another and share basic qualities. Geology is neither a network, a part nor an incident. Neighborhood people group ought to agree to government laws and homegrown guidelines. However long they meet the necessities of these chances, everybody has equivalent open doors for a mind-blowing duration. Individuals who are qualified and give a valiant effort for the network lead the network. Society depends on unrestrained choice, except if rules are watched and nobody is harmed. Rules and guidelines are intended to ensure individuals of the general public so as to fabricate a protected and agreeable network. There are two fundamental kinds of network networks, networks characterized by geologically characterized networks and topographically various factors. Instances of topographically characterized networks are networks or local locations. The assembled houses share a typical space. Nearby economies and local organizations are likewise viewed as a major aspect of the neighboring network. Individuals from the network are invested individuals in network wellbeing, and I am keen on this What is a network? Parker characterizes the network as individuals who share a typical space or locale, share a typical relationship, interface with one another, and are broadly utilized in the writing (Fritz, 1985). The people group comprises of common commitments and communications connecting people to establishments and relationship organizations. In most topographical networks, there is a typical association and a pretty much free network. Schools, law requirement offices, and social government assistance offices are three instances of formal associations inside the network that are especially applicable for substance misuse. Guardians and understudy associations contrast in structure, normal to most networks, and can assume a significant part in forestalling drug misuse. Local gatherings and individuals from the association cooperate to make, characterize, and tackle social issues by communicating with each other. Declining Drug Abuse: Sociological Strategy for Community Social Practice W. David Watts South West Texas State University Methodologies for network based sociological practice are examined. With regards to social development of reasonable hypotheses, the part of sociologists in helping networks comprehend social issues has been examined. When the network acknowledges young people 'substance misuse issues, the hypothesis of control and partners' affiliation can lead sociologists who wish to work with nearby pioneers to battle drug misuse. Network association, fortify the association among guardians and different gatherings, bring down the network's capacity to bear drug misuse, manufacture uphold for peer anticipation Declining Drug Abuse: Sociological Strategy for Community Social Practice W. David Watts South West Texas State University A gathering of individuals in a network with a typical point (eg history, values, steadfastness, shared objectives). In this system, network individuals are given participations (eg "comparative") characterized by individuals' proprietorship dependent on outer definition standards identified with network capacities (eg as school of understudies) and individual trust for enrollment Recognition) is incorporated. Individuals with political or social issues 2 Citizenship is the way that the regular association among individuals is more noteworthy than that of huge families (counting relatives), and resident's dynamic, investment, administration and It is the guideline of authoritative administration. , Mechanism and Process The expression "network" is frequently used to allude to where individuals live and to all individuals living there. A people group may likewise allude to a gathering of individuals who perceive themselves as networks since encounters, histories, values, religion, culture, and so forth are shared. The chairman can consider his town a network, yet in many urban areas there are a few self-characterized networks - the Italian-American people group, the gay network, the Jewish people group, the African American people group, the business network I don't accept that all individuals from these networks have a similar view or act a similar way, yet I think there is something just the same as different individuals from the network.>GET ANSWER