Read Focus 1.1: Beyond A Reasonable Doubt – An Example ( see in your textbook page 20).
• Review Florida’s definition of “beyond a reasonable doubt” here: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/jury_instructions/instructions-ch3.shtml (3.7)
• Research and read the facts of the case noted below and answer the question(s) that follow:
CASE INFORMATION
Harvey Weinstein was one of Hollywood’s most powerful men. The former megaproducer’s criminal trial started on Monday, January 6, 2020, in Manhattan, where Weinstein faces sexual assault charges that may land him in prison for years.
DISCUSSION QUESTION(s)-
- Under Florida’s definition, If Weinstein were tried using the information above, would you be convinced of his guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt” ?
- (a) Why or why not? (Make sure that your post includes your reasoning for your decision. Explain which facts helped you to your conclusion and how they either convinced you of Weinstein’s guilt or how they left you with doubt.)
Sample Solution
