Perform the following three labs, making sure to document your results with either screenshots or notes for your own documentation so that you can remember what you did in the labs. Access the uCertify tab in the Table of Contents, choose the Dashboard, and select “Hands-On Labs” button in the middle of the screen in uCertify. All Lesson/Labs will be visible. Locate the Lesson/Lab name and complete the lab assigned. Some units will have Lesson/Labs that do not correspond to the unit number you are on. Please read the Lesson/Lab name carefully.
uCertify CISM – Certified Information Security Manager LiveLab
• Lesson 2: Using Social Engineering Techniques to Plan an Attack
• Lesson 2: Demonstrating Network Mapping and Quarantining a Vulnerable System
uCertify CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst (CySA+)
• Lesson 2: Identifying a Suspicious Account on the System User Groups
Using your lab results, write a 2- to 3-page analysis that provides an assessment of social engineering techniques found in the labs and the reading. You should identify a minimum of three social engineering techniques as well as related mitigation strategies. An example would be a user receiving a phishing email purporting to be from the IRS giving the status of their tax refund with a link that downloads ransomware. The remediation strategy might involve a combination of user training and restoring a recent backup image of the affected system.
Unit 2 Assignment Social Engineering
Outcomes addressed in this activity:
Unit Outcome:
• Distinguish appropriate standards and methodologies for cybersecurity solutions.
Course Outcome:
: Assess appropriate cybersecurity processes for addressing appropriate outcomes.
Purpose
Almost two-thirds of all cybersecurity attacks are initiated by some sort of social engineering exploit. No matter how strong and effective a cybersecurity infrastructure may be, the safeguards can easily be bypassed by a clever social engineering attack. Protecting an organization against social engineering requires a combination of user training and mitigation strategies. The main difficulty that many organizations have when dealing with social engineering occurs when personnel are unclear about what to do if they find themselves in an uncertain situation. Well-crafted security policies and regular training can help mitigate personnel vulnerability to social engineering. This assignment gives you the attacker’s point of view when planning a social engineering attack as well as some mitigation strategies.
Assignment Instructions
Create an analysis assessing a minimum of three social engineering techniques discovered in your lab results and from the reading. Feel free to include more techniques in your analysis, but three should be the minimum. Be sure to note the exploitability, the relative impact on the organization, and the scope of the attack. Following your social engineering analysis, provide 2–3 pages of discussion that includes a description of the social engineering techniques, how each of the techniques relates to risk for the organization, and how each technique can be mitigated or prevented.
The minimum page count is 2–3 pages (excluding title page, etc.). If you require more pages to thoroughly discuss the identified techniques, then include them. Your paper should use Times New Roman 12-point font, be double spaced, and use correct APA formatting (title page and reference page). Be sure to use proper APA in-text citations that match your reference list.

Sample Solution

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer