Based off of the Citibank financial analysis paper that you wrote, previously for me, I have to further discuss the
organizations Resources, capabilities, and distinctive capabilities. Also have to conduct a VRIO/VRIS Analysis.
Citibank Financial analysis Summary
· Understand the process by which companies create value for
customers and profit for themselves.
· Understand the importance of superiority in creating value
and generating high profitability.
· Analyze the sources of the company’s competitive advantage.
-Strengths that are driving profitability, or Weaknesses,
opportunities for improvement
essay would entail that contraception is wrong only if something were denied a human future of value by contraception.” Which is mainly why people use contraception; to prevent the reality of a baby. In this premise, Marquis believes that contraception is the cause of the fatality of many possible foetus cells from becoming. Considering all of these premises, Marquis concludes his argument that “Finally, this analysis can be viewed as resolving a standard problem-indeed, the standard problem-concerning the ethics of abortion. Clearly, it is wrong to kill adult human beings. Clearly is it not wrong to end the life of some arbitrarily chosen single human cell.” Marquis expresses in his conclusion that many people believe that since foetuses aren’t human beings, their liabilities are non existent. Comparing both arguments, they both cover the topic of abortion and how people view it, where both arguments seem to be oppose abortion. In Noonan’s argument, he bases his premises and conclusion solely on the distinctions and difficulties and faults of anti-abortion within the population and what people often believe to be true. His conclusion states that if many people believe solely that foetuses don’t have have the same physical characteristics as humans do, then it could ruin the idea of humanity. Marquis on the other hand, has a more emotional standpoint where he expresses the faults and statements of people who believe that abortion is the answers in which he concludes directly that Abortion is wrong. So comparing these two arguments, we can clearly see that Noonan’s argument is solely based on the faults of anti-abortion and why people believe in it; whereas Marquis’s argument is solely based on the faults of abortion and why he believes in it. When it comes to inductive vs deductive arguments, Noonan’s argument is an inductive argument because his conclusion states that “If humanity depends on social recognition, individuals may be dehumanized.” Noonan’s conclusion is based on predicting the future. Since the future is not always evident, Noonan’s argument proves to be inductive since his conclusion is not completely true and can be proven false. Marquis’s argument on the other hand is a deductive argument. Why I believe this is because many of his premises are proven true, and his conclusion backs up his premises making his conclusion true. It is a direct statement that Marquis believes to be true, therefore making his argument a deductive one. When it comes to which argument has the more successful argument, it would be Don Marquis because his argument showcases many relevant premises that back up his conclusion making his argument valid. In his argument he includes a variety of premises from factual claims, value laden claims, and even a rebuttal to one of his premises in which he comes up with a counter argument, expressing his claim to be true. One of his premises that proved to be valid, considering his conclusion was his second premise.. This premise proves to be factual be>GET ANSWER