A car audio manufacturer has developed a car stereo system that incorporates the latest technology. The manufacturer has decided to use two distribution channels. One channel is to move the product from manufacturer to auto makers who will install the product in new cars. The second channel is to make the product available to consumers through electronics specialty stores. The manufacturer realizes that the channels will differ in terms of length and channel membership.
Write an essay (2-3 pages) addressing the following:
A. Discuss the importance of choosing appropriate channel members.
B. Identify and list at least 5 criteria that the manufacturer should use when evaluating potential intermediaries for the firm’s distribution channels.
C. Discuss each criterion that the car audio manufacturer should use when evaluating potential intermediaries for the firm’s distribution channels.
much like the above instances, within the america, ideal court of California within the case of Thor v superior court held that a capable affected person (prisoner) has the right to just accept or to refuse clinical treatment even on the hazard of death. right here, the right to workout self-dedication prevails in a situation of a able affected person. In R. v.Collins and Ashworth health facility Authority ex p. Brady, Brady argues that the pressure-feeding turned into illegal considering that he's mentally capable. As referred to at the above case laws, a “capable prisoner can't lawfully be force-fed”. however, in Brady’s case, the health center professional’s statement on his intellectual incapacity justified the lawfulness of the force-feeding carried out upon him. private motivation, mental potential, and the consent of the prisoner hunger strikers is the principle points that might be contemplating for the prison authorities and the scientific body of workers to make their selection. pressure-feeding of the prisoner who goes on hunger strike must be done in accordance to the factors above. Motivation and sound of mind of the starvation striker decide the goal of such moves to differentiate it from suicide. As in Robb case, the jail authorities and scientific workforce are keep away from from illegal act for being abstain of conducting a scientific treatment in the basis of refusal of prisoner with a legitimate thoughts. whilst in Brady‘s case, pressure-feeding turned into conducted in challenge of the prisoner’s motivation to devote suicide via ravenous himself to dying. regarding the sufferers with a legitimate of thoughts, the proper of self willpower prevails, and therefore to administer food in force isn't justified. but, in sure cases such as Brady’s, force-feeding is justified in the basis of preserving ones existence. In view of prohibition of torture, it's miles clean that force-feeding is so awful hence lead to inhuman and degrading treatment, therefore prison government and scientific officers should tell the starvation striker patients on the hazard of such motion. Article 2 at the right to lifestyles would only prevails Article three on prohibition of torture if there’s a specific purpose on the idea of medical necessity and the inability of the patients to determine for them. with regard of cases wherein death is the primary objective, which includes Brady‘s, retaining ones life comes first earlier than self determination. The prisoners’ proper to refuse any clinical remedy or pressure-feeding ought to be respected, but it should be noted that scientific necessity and intellectual incapacity would play a key position on making the decision to outweigh that proper.>GET ANSWER