Provide the latitude, longitude, date, depth, magnitude and description for the earthquake identified here via IRIS’s Wilber 3. [3 marks]
Independently validate this event’s epicenter.
From the “Wilber 3: Select Stations” page here, select seismograms for at least three stations that recorded this earthquake.
a. Report the stations used by completing Table 1 below. (Note: “CASY” is a placeholder entry. It should only remain in the table if you intend to make use of it. Marks are awarded here for completing the table and including it in your submission.) [6 marks]
b. Click on the “Show Record Section” to view the seismographs corresponding to the stations you selected.
1 Then adjust the time range so that data is reported
until 1 minute after the S-wave arrival.
2
i. Capture a screenshot (see example below in Figure 1) that includes the
stations you have chosen and their corresponding seismograms. [3
marks]
ii. For each of your stations, determine the P-S wave arrival time difference in minutes and seconds (MM:SS).
3 Add this data to Table 1. [3 marks]
1 Note that not all of the stations you selected may have observed the event of interest. Therefore, ensure you select at least three stations that actually recorded the event.
2 This ensures the S-wave arrival appears in your plot of the records.
3 Note that the arrival time of the S wave (blue vertical bar) is relative to that of the P-wave arrival (red vertical bar at time 0:00:00).
iii. Using travel times curves for P and S waves (Figure 2 below), determine the corresponding distance in kilometers. Add this data to Table 1. (Hint:
Including or referencing a diagram may prove useful.) [3 marks]
iv. State in words the meaning of this distance in kilometers. [2 marks]
c. State in words the meaning of this distance in degrees. (Hint: Including or
referencing a diagram may prove useful.) [2 marks]
Table 1. Details for selected stations and event specifics. (Note: You are expected to provide a
completed version of this table in your submission.)
Access IRIS’s “Earthquake Triangulation” resource.
a. Before opening the resource itself, review the instructions here – especially the
section entitled “IF YOU HAVE SEISMOGRAMS AND WANT TO DETERMINE
THE EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER”.
b. Using the Earthquake Triangulation app here:
i. Estimate the epicenter of the earthquake using the distance data in
kilometers from your Table 1. The epicenter should be identified via the
app using a marker.
Provide a screenshot that illustrates the epicentral location. (The
screenshot should include the triangulated location plus the
marker.) [3 marks]
State the corresponding location of the epicenter in terms of
latitude and longitude. Add this data to Table 2 below. [1 mark]
ii. Estimate the epicenter of the earthquake using the distance data in
degrees from your Table 1. The epicenter should be identified via the app
using a marker.
Provide a screenshot that illustrates the epicentral location. (The
screenshot should include the triangulated location plus the
marker.) [3 marks]
State the corresponding location of the epicenter in terms of
latitude and longitude. Add this data to Table 2 below. [1 mark]
4Note: Stations such as CASY are too far away to allow for distance estimates from travel time graphs!
Station (ID &
Name)
Latitude
(°)
Longitude
(°)
Distance
(°)
P-S wave
difference
(MM:SS)
Distance
(km)
CASY – Casey,
Antartica
-66.28 110.54 105.84 11:45
(11.75)
???
4
c. Using NOAA’s distance calculator here:
i. Determine the accuracy (in kilometers) of the Question 3(b)(i)(2) epicenter
location relative to the official determination stated here in Question 1.
Add this to Table 2 below. [2 marks]
ii. Determine the accuracy (in kilometers) of the Question 3(b)(ii)(2)
epicenter location relative to the official determination stated here in
Question 1. Add this to Table 2 below. [2 marks]
iii. Which of these estimates proves to be more accurate in practice? Why do
you think this is the case? [2 marks]
Table 2. Epicenter determination for the event of interest using length and angular measures for
triangulation. (Note: You are expected to provide a completed version of this table in your
submission.)
Briefly compare the Question 1 event with the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami.
State the latitude and longitude of the March 11, 2011 Tohoku earthquake using the
official data available here. [1 mark]
Using NOAA’s distance calculator here, determine the distance between the Tohoku
earthquake and the event identified here in Question 1. [2 marks]
By reviewing the information here, did the earthquake identified in Question 1 pose a
tsunami threat?
5
[1 mark]
40 marks total
Resources
Hyperlinked as needed in context above.
5 As indicated towards the bottom (“All information provided here, including data on latitude, longitude,
depth, magnitude and seismic intensity, is based on initial reports and is subject to change pending
evaluation.”), earthquake specifics detailed on this web page were preliminary – reported some three
minutes after the event. This explains why there exists some differences relative to the official
determination identified in Question 1.
Distance Estimation Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Accuracy (km)
Kilometers
Degrees
Note: Figures follow below.
Figure 1. A “Show Record Section” screenshot obtained after selecting three events using the
“Wilber 3: Select Stations” page here.
Figure 2. Travel time curves for P and S waves.

Sample Solution

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer